fishin wrote: Bella Dea wrote:fishin wrote:Bella Dea wrote:Oh for heavens sake.
There is no such thing as voluntary rape. Get a grip.
If a man takes advantage of a women who is so drunk she can't function, that is rape.
If a man takes advantage of a woman who is drunk but is still in control of her body, it is not rape.
Rape is when someone takes sex from you. You do not ask for it. You do not suggest it. You do not want it. Period.
Rape is not about sex. Rape is about power and control over another person.
When will people learn this?
When men stop getting arrested and convicted for rape because some woman changed her mind the morning after.
While everything you stated is (AFAIK) true from a clinical perspective, that isn't the case for the legal aspects of it.
Could you possibly provide some statistics and numbers backing this up?
At least
one investigation pegged the number at 41%.
This appears to be about after the fact exonerations. With the use of DNA, many more correct convictions must occur. Is there any recent data? This appears to be from 1996.
fishin wrote:
A
Justice Department Study found that 33% of those tried, convicted and sentenced were later exhonerated by DNA evidence. But there are plenty of ancedotal cases as evidence too.
This was a study done in one town, and it didn't say (unless I missed it) that they were convicted, just that there were false accusations. And again, the research is dated.
fishin wrote:
The
Tamara Anne Mounier case is a perfect example.
But my original point that the legal system doesn't care about issues of power, etc. It is only concerned with penetration and consent. The "why" aspect isn't relevant to being convicted.
The why doesn't matter, truth be told.
Again, the Tamara case is about accusations, not convictions.
fishin wrote:
Quote:There are far more rapes that go unprosecuted than there are ones that do.
I have no doubt that this is true. I don't see how that justifes trying to send someone who DIDN'T commit a rape to prison though.
It doesn't and you still did not provide statistical proof that INNOCENT men go to prison.