Bi-Polar Bear wrote:no, because you used the word black and obama in the same sentence so you are a profiler and a racist...
This is a strawman that a Republican wingnut would be proud of.
Read what Geraldine Ferraro said.
Geraldine is suggesting that Barack... a man who even a Hillary devotee should understand is a man of considerable skill who attracts the youth vote and the educated vote.... is only successful because of some kind of "reverse racism".
If you don't understand why this is offensive, then I don't know what to say.
The facts are
- Barack Obama is a better speaker than Hillary and is inspiring voters where Hillary is not.
- Obama has been consistant in opposing the war where Hillary has not, and he has expressed views on stopping future wars that many of us prefer to Hillaries dithering on the subject.
- Obama has run a positive campaign where Hillary has not.
- Obama has set up a much better campaign ground organization in States that Hillary ignored until too late.
- Obama consistently beats McCain in national head to head polls
- Obama has won more pledged delegates. He has won more states. And, he has won a greater percentage of the popular votes.
There are many reasons that Obama is winning this election (and has pretty near mathematically wrapped it up).
It will be nice when Hillary (and her devotees) can accept that they were beaten by a better candidate who ran a better campaign.
Claiming that she is the victim of racism is both offensive and idiotic.
