@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:
hey at least i listen to rush, not as much as i used to granted, it's not convenient, i could never get through ten minutes of that liberal dreck
my thoughts about rush as a person are based more on him as a person than as a political figure, he personally comes across as smarmy bastard, so did al franken when he had his show (maybe he still does i don't know), so do the two main lib broads maddows and ?
actually the other consevative radio guys (there's two normal dudes but i can't remember there names and then there's savage, for sheer entertainment value my fave, guys got more loose screws than a hardware store, but damn he's entertaining) seem pretty down to earth, i could lose the religion aspect, but what you gonna do
Interesting opinion. If you care to know what I really think of Rush, he has a pretty large ego, and his success has brought him some personal heartache with all the money earned, broken marriages, etc., but I believe the man to be a decent man that deeply loves this country, and he does a great job of analyzing the political landscape from a conservative viewpoint. I agree with much of what he believes, but I also have some disagreements with some points.
I also find many other conservative talk people to be at least as informative and insightful as Rush, and I also find it interesting and very revealing that there are far more conservative talk people that have made it, with almost no libs that have been successful. I believe the primary reason is that liberalism is emotionally based, while conservatism is based upon reason, and talk radio spends all of its time talking about reasons for this and reasons for that, based upon evidence instead of emotion. Thus a liberal talking for a while is boring and aimless because it is based upon feelings instead of evidence or facts, so after a while the listeners become bored and lose interest. Also, liberal listeners tend to be bored with it and change the channel to music or something else, their ipod or something. Meanwhile the conservative listener is very engaged and understands all of the reasonings and angles brought out by somebody like Rush, etc. And example of emotional vs fact based is - take one issue, global warming, we must save the earth and all that crap is based upon emotion, almost a religious feeling about it, but seldom do the people actually know any details about the subject, but conservatives are intensely interested in the data and how it is derived and so forth. Another example is health care, libs say we must do something because we are the richest country in the world and it is terrible that somebody does not have health insurance, never mind the details of fixing the problems with the appropriate fixes. Conservatives can identify the problems in terms of which ones are the most significant and how to fix each, without scrapping the entire system as we have it. That is why the dictator wannabes as Obama prey upon people with emotional cliches and mantras, and it ends up being a scenario where he will get people to do something even if it is wrong.
A few other talk people I respect and like to varying degrees are Hannity, Lars Larsen, Michael Medved, Michael Reagan (haven't heard him in a long time so is he still around), Glenn Beck, Laura Ingraham, Dennis Miller, Dennis Prager, Mike McConnell, Bill O'Reilly, and I can't recall any more names right now but I think there are more. Savage, I don't care for the guy, he is into shock jock stuff, and no thanks as far as I am concerned. I also catch Dave Ramsey sometimes, or Money Talk with Bob Brinker some saturdays in the garage. He picks on both parties when the subject edges into politics from money, and he often observes the obvious that our energy policy is non-existent to a total disaster. Many or most of the above personalities commonly identify problems and largely reasonable solutions to the problems, based upon facts and evidence, so it is frustrating to see the political world at large, which is now controlled by liberal Democrats and the liberal press proceed merrily along with no clue as to how screwed up their policies and reasonings for them are. Problems go unsolved and new problems are created with ridiculous new policies. Alot of the reason this is happening is because their politics is based upon emotion and power, and the liberal press and the liberal public that swallows the crap based upon some emotional feeling or guilt complex that they may be carrying around.