55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 12:37 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
How he managed to graduate from any school is a mystery of our times.


Perhaps too big an assumption, CI.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 12:45 pm
@okie,
Quote:
When was the last time any government program run[sic] efficiently and within budget?


Well, it has been a while. Bush was elected in 2000, so ... .

Quote:
And how well off were the people in Russia during Stalin's reign, wherein Stalin and his government were supposed to take care of everyone,


It is truly the height of stupidity to blame a political ideology because of some people.

China pretty much tells us that the time you spend with your head up your ass clearly illustrates that you do at least know your ass from a hole in the ground.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 12:48 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:
Quote:
China pretty much tells us that the time you spend with your head up your ass clearly illustrates that you do at least know your ass from a hole in the ground.


Even that is debatable.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 04:52 pm
@JTT,
Okie wrote: "Pretty sad, and it should be ample proof that centrally planned economies do not work hardly at all. Actually Cuba is just one of many many examples."

JTT wrote: "Your ignorance knows no bounds, Okie. Have you heard of China, Sweden, Denmark, Vietnam, ... ?"
China, Sweden, Denmark, and Vietnam are increasing their free versus their planned economy.

Cuba and Venezuela are increasing their planned versus their free economy.

Which of these nations will obtain the highest total emplyment per capita?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 04:58 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter" wrote:
okie uses Limbaugh and FOX news for his facts; what can he possibly understand anything about anything to repeat them here; he's a dork first class.

He believes in the obstructionist party (the No Party/GOP), death panels, birthers, and tea parties. He also believes one president can transform our economy from capitalism to socialism. He's the only a2ker who can predict Obama's rating as a president before the first year in office (actually, he's been lambasting Obama since the first few months of his presidency).

His ignorance knows no bounds. His claims are never backed up with facts or evidence, only his overgrown imagination.

How he managed to graduate from any school is a mystery of our times. His reality belongs not on earth as a living, breathing, animal, but someplace out in the stratosphere where he can exchange ideas with angels.

Where's your evidence, cice?
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 05:06 pm
The Obama covetors are acting like they believe the best way to raise the less wealthy is to lower the more wealthy.

But isn't it the more wealthy people who employ the less wealthy people, thereby making the less wealthy people more wealthy than they would be if the wealthy did not hire them?

Also, if the more wealthy people became less wealthy, wouldn't they hire fewer less wealthy people?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 08:54 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

cicerone imposter" wrote:
okie uses Limbaugh and FOX news for his facts; what can he possibly understand anything about anything to repeat them here; he's a dork first class.


I don't read ci's posts much anymore, but hey, tell ci that I am glad to be a dork first class, thats better than a dork second class!! Or even an imposter, its better than an imposter first class and imposter second class combined!!!!!
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 09:06 pm
@okie,
Your point being? A dork is a dork is a dork...classifications go beyond your ability to understand.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 11:31 pm
@okie,
Quote:
tell ci that I am glad to be a dork first class, thats better than a dork second class!!


I think that you are a wee bit confused, Okie. Same ole, same ole, eh?
okie
 
  2  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 02:16 pm
@JTT,
Rush Limbaugh says libs don't have a sense of humor. That is confirmed again.
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 02:20 pm
@okie,
rush is a giant bag of douche, but he is entertaining, unlike every liberal radio person, air america or what ever it's called is deadly dull
okie
 
  2  
Reply Sun 6 Dec, 2009 08:21 pm
@djjd62,
Based upon what you just said, I think Rush has a thousand times more decency than you do. Do not judge others by how you think.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Dec, 2009 08:29 pm
@okie,
It depends on what you use to think. Most of us know that djjd62 is pretty rational on most of his posts - unlike yours where your opinion comes from - where we're not sure of, but we must presume it's from FOX News and Limbaugh.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Dec, 2009 08:39 pm
@okie,
On the other hand, you believe Sarah Palin's book, Going Rogue" is factual, when in fact there are many half-truths and outright lies in it.

See if you can absorb some of these fact checks on her book:
Quote:
FACT CHECK: Palin's book goes rogue on some facts
By CALVIN WOODWARD, Associated Press Writer Calvin Woodward, Associated Press Writer Sat Nov 14, 11:18 am ET

WASHINGTON " Sarah Palin's new book reprises familiar claims from the 2008 presidential campaign that haven't become any truer over time.

Ignoring substantial parts of her record if not the facts, she depicts herself as a frugal traveler on the taxpayer's dime, a reformer without ties to powerful interests and a politician roguishly indifferent to high ambition.

Palin goes adrift, at times, on more contemporary issues, too. She criticizes President Barack Obama for pushing through a bailout package that actually was achieved by his Republican predecessor George W. Bush " a package she seemed to support at the time.

A look at some of her statements in "Going Rogue," obtained by The Associated Press in advance of its release Tuesday:

___

PALIN: Says she made frugality a point when traveling on state business as Alaska governor, asking "only" for reasonably priced rooms and not "often" going for the "high-end, robe-and-slippers" hotels.

THE FACTS: Although travel records indicate she usually opted for less-pricey hotels while governor, Palin and daughter Bristol stayed five days and four nights at the $707.29-per-night Essex House luxury hotel (robes and slippers come standard) overlooking New York City's Central Park for a five-hour women's leadership conference in October 2007. With air fare, the cost to Alaska was well over $3,000. Event organizers said Palin asked if she could bring her daughter. The governor billed her state more than $20,000 for her children's travel, including to events where they had not been invited, and in some cases later amended expense reports to specify that they had been on official business.

___

PALIN: Boasts that she ran her campaign for governor on small donations, mostly from first-time givers, and turned back large checks from big donors if her campaign perceived a conflict of interest.

THE FACTS: Of the roughly $1.3 million she raised for her primary and general election campaigns for governor, more than half came from people and political action committees giving at least $500, according to an AP analysis of her campaign finance reports. The maximum that individual donors could give was $1,000; $2,000 for a PAC.

Of the rest, about $76,000 came from Republican Party committees.

She accepted $1,000 each from a state senator and his wife in the weeks after the two Republican lawmakers' offices were raided by the FBI as part of an investigation into a powerful Alaska oilfield services company. After AP reported those donations during the presidential campaign, she said she would give a comparative sum to charity after the general election in 2010, a date set by state election laws.

___

PALIN: Rails against taxpayer-financed bailouts, which she attributes to Obama. She recounts telling daughter Bristol that to succeed in business, "you'll have to be brave enough to fail."

THE FACTS: Palin is blurring the lines between Obama's stimulus plan " a $787 billion package of tax cuts, state aid, social programs and government contracts " and the federal bailout that Republican presidential candidate John McCain voted for and President George W. Bush signed.

Palin's views on bailouts appeared to evolve as McCain's vice presidential running mate. In September 2008, she said "taxpayers cannot be looked to as the bailout, as the solution, to the problems on Wall Street." A week later, she said "ultimately what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy."

During the vice presidential debate in October, Palin praised McCain for being "instrumental in bringing folks together" to pass the $700 billion bailout. After that, she said "it is a time of crisis and government did have to step in."

___

PALIN: Says Ronald Reagan faced an even worse recession than the one that appears to be ending now, and "showed us how to get out of one. If you want real job growth, cut capital gains taxes and slay the death tax once and for all."

THE FACTS: The estate tax, which some call the death tax, was not repealed under Reagan and capital gains taxes are lower now than when Reagan was president.

Economists overwhelmingly say the current recession is far worse. The recession Reagan faced lasted for 16 months; this one is in its 23rd month. The recession of the early 1980s did not have a financial meltdown. Unemployment peaked at 10.8 percent, worse than the October 2009 high of 10.2 percent, but the jobless rate is still expected to climb.

___

PALIN: She says her team overseeing the development of a natural gas pipeline set up an open, competitive bidding process that allowed any company to compete for the right to build a 1,715-mile pipeline to bring natural gas from Alaska to the Lower 48.

THE FACTS: Palin characterized the pipeline deal the same way before an AP investigation found her team crafted terms that favored only a few independent pipeline companies and ultimately benefited a company with ties to her administration, TransCanada Corp. Despite promises and legal guidance not to talk directly with potential bidders during the process, Palin had meetings or phone calls with nearly every major candidate, including TransCanada.

___

PALIN: Criticizes an aide to her predecessor, Gov. Frank Murkowski, for a conflict of interest because the aide represented the state in negotiations over a gas pipeline and then left to work as a handsomely paid lobbyist for ExxonMobil. Palin asserts her administration ended all such arrangements, shoving a wedge in the revolving door between special interests and the state capital.

THE FACTS: Palin ignores her own "revolving door" issue in office; the leader of her own pipeline team was a former lobbyist for a subsidiary of TransCanada, the company that ended up winning the rights to build the pipeline.

___

PALIN: Writes about a city councilman in Wasilla, Alaska, who owned a garbage truck company and tried to push through an ordinance requiring residents of new subdivisions to pay for trash removal instead of taking it to the dump for free " this to illustrate conflicts of interest she stood against as a public servant.

THE FACTS: As Wasilla mayor, Palin pressed for a special zoning exception so she could sell her family's $327,000 house, then did not keep a promise to remove a potential fire hazard on the property.

She asked the city council to loosen rules for snow machine races when she and her husband owned a snow machine store, and cast a tie-breaking vote to exempt taxes on aircraft when her father-in-law owned one. But she stepped away from the table in 1997 when the council considered a grant for the Iron Dog snow machine race in which her husband competes.

___

PALIN: Says Obama has admitted that the climate change policy he seeks will cause people's electricity bills to "skyrocket."

THE FACTS: She correctly quotes a comment attributed to Obama in January 2008, when he told San Francisco Chronicle editors that under his cap-and-trade climate proposal, "electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket" as utilities are forced to retrofit coal burning power plants to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

Obama has argued since then that climate legislation can blunt the cost to consumers. Democratic legislation now before Congress calls for a variety of measures aimed at mitigating consumer costs. Several studies predict average household costs probably would be $100 to $145 a year.

___

PALIN: Welcomes last year's Supreme Court decision deciding punitive damages for victims of the nation's largest oil spill tragedy, the Exxon Valdez disaster, stating it had taken 20 years to achieve victory. As governor, she says, she'd had the state argue in favor of the victims, and she says the court's ruling went "in favor of the people." Finally, she writes, Alaskans could recover some of their losses.

THE FACTS: That response is at odds with her reaction at the time to the ruling, which resolved the long-running case by reducing punitive damages for victims to $500 million from $2.5 billion. Environmentalists and plaintiffs' lawyers decried the ruling as a slap at the victims and Palin herself said she was "extremely disappointed." She said the justices had gutted a jury decision favoring higher damage awards, the Anchorage Daily News reported. "It's tragic that so many Alaska fishermen and their families have had their lives put on hold waiting for this decision," she said, noting many had died "while waiting for justice."

___

PALIN: Describing her resistance to federal stimulus money, Palin describes Alaska as a practical, libertarian haven of independent Americans who don't want "help" from government busybodies.

THE FACTS: Alaska is also one of the states most dependent on federal subsidies, receiving much more assistance from Washington than it pays in federal taxes. A study for the nonpartisan Tax Foundation found that in 2005, the state received $1.84 for every dollar it sent to Washington.

___

PALIN: Says she tried to talk about national security and energy independence in her interview with Vogue magazine but the interviewer wanted her to pivot from hydropower to high fashion.

THE FACTS are somewhat in dispute. Vogue contributing editor Rebecca Johnson said Palin did not go on about hydropower. "She just kept talking about drilling for oil."

___

PALIN: "Was it ambition? I didn't think so. Ambition drives; purpose beckons." Throughout the book, Palin cites altruistic reasons for running for office, and for leaving early as Alaska governor.

THE FACTS: Few politicians own up to wanting high office for the power and prestige of it, and in this respect, Palin fits the conventional mold. But "Going Rogue" has all the characteristics of a pre-campaign manifesto, the requisite autobiography of the future candidate.

___

AP writers Matt Apuzzo, Sh


Can you deny any of these facts?

djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Dec, 2009 08:40 pm
@okie,
hey at least i listen to rush, not as much as i used to granted, it's not convenient, i could never get through ten minutes of that liberal dreck

my thoughts about rush as a person are based more on him as a person than as a political figure, he personally comes across as smarmy bastard, so did al franken when he had his show (maybe he still does i don't know), so do the two main lib broads maddows and ?

actually the other consevative radio guys (there's two normal dudes but i can't remember there names and then there's savage, for sheer entertainment value my fave, guys got more loose screws than a hardware store, but damn he's entertaining) seem pretty down to earth, i could lose the religion aspect, but what you gonna do
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Dec, 2009 08:46 pm
@okie,
you will probably be surprised, but i really liked the conservative party in canada before it was hijacked by a right wing extreme group, i'd like to see your guys and mine move towards the center a bit more
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Dec, 2009 09:47 pm
@okie,
Nice try, Okie.

Quote:
Rush Limbaugh says libs don't have a sense of humor.


Hasn't he been indicted yet?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Dec, 2009 09:53 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Can you deny any of these facts?


That's their stock in trade, CI.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Dec, 2009 11:07 pm
@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:

hey at least i listen to rush, not as much as i used to granted, it's not convenient, i could never get through ten minutes of that liberal dreck

my thoughts about rush as a person are based more on him as a person than as a political figure, he personally comes across as smarmy bastard, so did al franken when he had his show (maybe he still does i don't know), so do the two main lib broads maddows and ?

actually the other consevative radio guys (there's two normal dudes but i can't remember there names and then there's savage, for sheer entertainment value my fave, guys got more loose screws than a hardware store, but damn he's entertaining) seem pretty down to earth, i could lose the religion aspect, but what you gonna do


Interesting opinion. If you care to know what I really think of Rush, he has a pretty large ego, and his success has brought him some personal heartache with all the money earned, broken marriages, etc., but I believe the man to be a decent man that deeply loves this country, and he does a great job of analyzing the political landscape from a conservative viewpoint. I agree with much of what he believes, but I also have some disagreements with some points.

I also find many other conservative talk people to be at least as informative and insightful as Rush, and I also find it interesting and very revealing that there are far more conservative talk people that have made it, with almost no libs that have been successful. I believe the primary reason is that liberalism is emotionally based, while conservatism is based upon reason, and talk radio spends all of its time talking about reasons for this and reasons for that, based upon evidence instead of emotion. Thus a liberal talking for a while is boring and aimless because it is based upon feelings instead of evidence or facts, so after a while the listeners become bored and lose interest. Also, liberal listeners tend to be bored with it and change the channel to music or something else, their ipod or something. Meanwhile the conservative listener is very engaged and understands all of the reasonings and angles brought out by somebody like Rush, etc. And example of emotional vs fact based is - take one issue, global warming, we must save the earth and all that crap is based upon emotion, almost a religious feeling about it, but seldom do the people actually know any details about the subject, but conservatives are intensely interested in the data and how it is derived and so forth. Another example is health care, libs say we must do something because we are the richest country in the world and it is terrible that somebody does not have health insurance, never mind the details of fixing the problems with the appropriate fixes. Conservatives can identify the problems in terms of which ones are the most significant and how to fix each, without scrapping the entire system as we have it. That is why the dictator wannabes as Obama prey upon people with emotional cliches and mantras, and it ends up being a scenario where he will get people to do something even if it is wrong.

A few other talk people I respect and like to varying degrees are Hannity, Lars Larsen, Michael Medved, Michael Reagan (haven't heard him in a long time so is he still around), Glenn Beck, Laura Ingraham, Dennis Miller, Dennis Prager, Mike McConnell, Bill O'Reilly, and I can't recall any more names right now but I think there are more. Savage, I don't care for the guy, he is into shock jock stuff, and no thanks as far as I am concerned. I also catch Dave Ramsey sometimes, or Money Talk with Bob Brinker some saturdays in the garage. He picks on both parties when the subject edges into politics from money, and he often observes the obvious that our energy policy is non-existent to a total disaster. Many or most of the above personalities commonly identify problems and largely reasonable solutions to the problems, based upon facts and evidence, so it is frustrating to see the political world at large, which is now controlled by liberal Democrats and the liberal press proceed merrily along with no clue as to how screwed up their policies and reasonings for them are. Problems go unsolved and new problems are created with ridiculous new policies. Alot of the reason this is happening is because their politics is based upon emotion and power, and the liberal press and the liberal public that swallows the crap based upon some emotional feeling or guilt complex that they may be carrying around.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Dec, 2009 11:18 pm
@okie,
A blind man can shoot holes in okie's opinions, but I'm gonna let somebody else take a crack at it - before I bring out my sixshooter.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.25 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 11:52:25