55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 02:22 pm
@ican711nm,
what the **** is a coveter

when are all the political douchebags gonna give up on this birther, teabagger, coveter ****

speak bloody english man
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 02:23 pm
Just like CRA, FANNIE, FREDDIE, TARP, STIMULUS, Obama Healthcare will cause significant increases in costs to the economy, and significant decreases in the number of people employed. Both are due to its resulting increase in taxes/fees/charges/penalties on individuals, and on small as well as large businesses.

The Obama Administration is repeating and expanding the mistakes of the Bush Administration, and causing a continuation of decreases in total employment by increasing rates of:
(1) government expenditures;
(2) increases in budget deficits;
(3) giveaways of government revenues.

Bush: decrease in total USA employment August 2008 to January 2009 = 3,174,000

Obama: decrease in total USA employment January 2009 to October 2009 = 3,824,000


Is Obama really that stupid? Does he really believe doing and expanding that which has made things worse, will cause things to get better?

Or, is Obama a mere puppet of others who are actually seeking to stifle the USA securing liberty and its consequent productive economy?
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 02:25 pm
@ican711nm,
to answer your questions yes and yes

the real question you should be asking is this, come 2012 is puppet head A gonna be any better than puppet head B
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 02:40 pm
@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:
what the **** is a coveter


A Coveter is a person that covets.
Quote:

http://unabridged.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/unabridged?va=covet&x=29&y=8
Main Entry: cov·et
...
Function: verb
...
1 : to wish for earnestly : crave possession or enjoyment of : long for
...
2 : to desire (another's possession or attribute) inordinately or culpably ...
...
intransitive verb : to feel or cherish inordinate desire or craving for another's possession or attributes
...

Quote:

Exodus 20:1 " 20:14
And God spoke all these words, saying:
...
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house; thou shall not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his man servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbour’s.
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 02:42 pm
@ican711nm,
i know what to covet means, i just figured "coveter" was more of that ridiculous political rhetoric that so many dickheads are so fond of
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 02:49 pm
@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:
the real question you should be asking is this, come 2012 is puppet head A gonna be any better than puppet head B

I don't want any puppet head for president.

Sarah Palin is an independent thinker and doer. She is not a puppet head. She is no one's puppet head. Read pp405 - 408 in her book, Going Rogue to learn what she has accomplished as governor of Alaska. Her accomplishments are obviously not the consequence of any puppeteer stringing her along.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 02:50 pm
I'm curious.

This thread has been around since March 2008. Has anyone assessed which, if any, of the posters accurately predicted the state of American Conservatism in 2008 and beyond?
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 02:52 pm
@ican711nm,
every elected official is somebodies puppet head, always has been always will be
at the best they're the electorates at the worst they're the lobbyists, but they are all operated by somebody
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 02:56 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
i've called all political followers douchebags, i'm pretty sure i've come closest
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 03:05 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dabuzz wrote:
This thread has been around since March 2008. Has anyone assessed which, if any, of the posters accurately predicted the state of American Conservatism in 2008 and beyond?


We'll have to wait until November 2010 elections to determine whether or not the efforts of Conservatives since 2008 will prove productive. If they do prove productive, then they will have accurately predicted that the Congress will become more conservative.

Up to now, Conservatives have validly forecast what the Obama crowd would attempt to accomplish.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 03:11 pm
@djjd62,
In the history of the USA, there have been a few elected officials who advocated and did what they independently thought was the right thing for them to do: Washington, Adams, Franklin, Jefferson, ... Truman, Eisenhower, Reagan.
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 03:14 pm
@ican711nm,
luckily i don't live in the united states, the mythos you folks so valiantly believe doesn't cloud my vision
okie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 03:15 pm
I don't know which thread this has been discussed before, and I don't think it justifies its own thread, but remember the Census worker found dead? Libs and new media suggested it was some right wing fanatic that hates the federal government that did it. I remember posting that nobody knew how it happened, including possible suicide. You guessed it, I was ridiculed and made fun of for suggesting it could even be suicide, and most likely it was no conservative right winger that murdered him anyway, that the media was way out of bounds for even suggesting it. Guess what, it has been ruled suicide. Will we hear any apologies from liberals or the media. I doubt it. I would not hold my breath.

Investigators: Kentucky Census Worker Killed Himself

A Kentucky census worker found hanging from a tree with the word "fed" written on his chest killed himself and staged his death to look like a murder, authorities said Tuesday.

....

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,576647,00.html

ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 03:17 pm
@djjd62,
What does cloud your vision? It is surely clouded?

"If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
- Samuel Adams, 1776
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 03:20 pm
@okie,
i couldn't understand why anybody cared one way another, just find out how he died, if it was murder arrest the killer

ever since reverend al distinguished himself with the brawley case i view any of these type things with extreme skepticism
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 03:22 pm
@ican711nm,
think what you like, at least it ain't the flag or the pledge or some piece of paper in a glass case, i got a life to live
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2009 03:26 pm
@djjd62,
Keep living your life!
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2009 10:50 am
Quote:
Who's watching Glenn Beck?
(Tim Rutten, Los Angeles Times, November 25, 2009)

For nearly a century, the Anti-Defamation League has stared unflinchingly into the dark corners of America's social psyche -- the places where combustible tendencies such as hatred and paranoia pool and, sometimes, burst into flame.

As a Jewish organization, the ADL's first preoccupation naturally is anti-Semitism, but in the last few decades it has extended its scrutiny to the whole range of bigoted malevolence -- white supremacy, the militia movement, neo-nativism and conspiratorial fantasies in all of their improbable permutations. These days, the organization's research is characterized by the sense of proportion and sobriety that long experience brings.

That makes its recent report on the extremist groups and propagandists that have emerged since President Obama's election -- "Rage Grows In America: Anti-Government Conspiracies" -- particularly notable. For the first time in living memory, the ADL is sounding the alarm about a mainstream media personality: Fox News' Glenn Beck, who also hosts a popular radio show.

The report notes that while "other conservative media hosts, such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, routinely attack Obama and his administration, typically on partisan grounds, they have usually dismissed or refused to give a platform to the conspiracy theorists and anti-government extremists." By contrast, "Beck and his guests have made a habit of demonizing President Obama and promoting conspiracy theories about his administration. ... Beck has even gone so far as to make comparisons between Hitler and Obama."

What gives all of this nonsense an ominous twist is Beck's announcement that he intends to use his TV and radio shows to promote a mass movement that will involve voter registration drives, training in community organizing and a series of regional conventions that will produce a "100-year plan" for America to be read from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial to a mass rally Aug. 28.

As Beck wrote on his website, "I know that the bipartisan corruption in Washington that has brought us to this brink and it will not be defeated easily. It will require unconventional thinking and a radical plan to restore our nation to the maximum freedoms we were supposed to have been protecting. ... All of the above will culminate in The Plan, a book that will provide specific policies, principles and, most importantly, action steps that each of us can take to play a role in this Refounding."

Hard times predictably throw up their demagogues. Still, even allowing for the frenetic pace of our wired world's 24-hour news cycle, it's remarkable how quickly the arc of Beck's career has come to resemble that of the Great Depression's uber-demagogue, Father Charles Coughlin. In the months after the crash of '29, Coughlin turned what had been a conventionally religious weekly radio broadcast into a platform for championing the downtrodden working man. He was an early supporter of the New Deal, coining the slogan "Roosevelt or Ruin," but quickly turned on the president for a variety of complex ideological and personal reasons. Coughlin flirted with Huey Long, launched an unsuccessful political party, published a popular newspaper, Social Justice, and even inspired and supported a kind of militia, the Christian Front, some of whose members were arrested by the FBI and charged with plotting a fascist coup.

As the 1930s dragged on, Coughlin, a longtime admirer of Francisco Franco, became virulently anti-Semitic, isolationist and pro-German. He also was extraordinarily popular. At their height, his weekly broadcasts attracted more than 40 million listeners. Still, after he lashed out at German Jews in the wake of Kristallnacht, many major urban radio stations dropped his program. Influential American prelates, the Vatican and prominent Catholic New Dealers had worked for some time to persuade Coughlin's superior, the archbishop of Detroit, to silence him. Shortly before the U.S. entered World War II, a new bishop was installed, and Coughlin was ordered to cease broadcasting. He accepted the clerical discipline and retired into a long life of bitter silence.

It's hard to imagine any contemporary cable system dropping Fox News simply because Beck is an offensively dangerous demagogue -- not with his ratings at least. His new foray into politics, though, presents Rupert Murdoch's network with a profound challenge. Is it willing to become the platform for an extremist political campaign, or will it draw a line as even the authoritarian Catholic Church of the 1940s did? CNN recently parted ways with its resident ranter, Lou Dobbs -- who now confirms he's weighing a presidential bid.

Does Fox see a similar problem with Beck -- and, if not, why?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2009 10:53 am
@wandeljw,
When they have millions of followers like okie and ican, their popularity will remain alive and well in this country. "Extremist dangerous demagogue" fits their mindset very well.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2009 02:07 pm
@wandeljw,
Wandeljw, Beck is extreme in his opposition to those who are extreme in their opposition to restricting the federal government to powers explicitly and logically implicitly granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the USA as amended.

Those who are extreme in their opposition to restricting the federal government to powers explicitly and logically implicitly granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the USA as amended, include the members of the Obama administration.

Those who are extreme in their opposition to those who are extreme in their opposition to restricting the federal government to powers explicitly and logically implicitly granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the USA as amended, include Conservatives.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.2 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 02:38:39