@FreeDuck,
FreeDuck wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
This 'original plan':
That's not a plan, that's a speech. I dare say you'd not mistake it for a plan when talking about his lofty speechifyin' skills. When is that from, btw?
So stating his intent to get to a single payer system is not his plan? Is not his intent? What planet did you say you were from?
For him to specifically tell his union buddies that he intends to get to a single payer plan and then leave the door open in a thrown bone that it isn't his intention for the time being does not give me any assurance that his intent is not a single payer plan. What possibly persuades you differently?
That video appears to have been from 2003, and admittedly nothing Obama has said since has indicated an intent to instigate a single-payer plan, though he does continue to favor that and would have it if starting a healthcare system from scratch. He has said that to institute it now would be disruptive. He has NOT ruled it out as an option for the future.
Quote:Quote:
Yes, which goes back to the idea that the more people you can make dependent, the more you solidify your total power and re-election chances. Just under 50% of the people voting pay little or no federal taxes at all and don't care how much in taxes everybody else has to pay. A sizable chunk of people voting depend on the government via the taxpayer to provide everything they get. He did not get elected on the radical program he is now pushing however, but rather on describing himself as "Reaganesque" and campaigning mostly right of center.
Your paragraph contradicts itself. In the beginning you seem to be saying that he was elected by people on the federal dole. Then you say that he got elected by campaigning right of center, which presumably would not appeal to said "dependent class". Which is it?
Where did I say that he was elected by people on the federal dole. I said that the more dependent you can make people, the more you can assure their vote. That is something quite different than saying that he was elected by people on the federal dole. Dependency takes many different forms.
But yes, he did appeal to the non-dependent class too by promising personal accountability, fiscal integrity, sensible economic policy, debt reduction--all issues that conservatives hold dear. It all sounded so good in the campaign rhetoric that many were willing to shrug off the corresponding images of Utopia on Earth if they would just elect him their messiah to lead them to a new promised land.
Quote:Quote:32% Favor Single-Payer Health Care, 57% Oppose
Monday, August 10, 2009
Thirty-two percent (32%) of voters nationwide favor a single-payer health care system where the federal government provides coverage for everyone. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 57% are opposed to a single-payer plan.
We can have dueling polls:
Quote:"Do you favor or oppose, "Having a national health plan in which all Americans would get their insurance through an expanded, universal form of Medicare-for all?"
Favor 58%, Oppose 38%, NA/DK 3%"
http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/7943.pdf
... but it's kind of irrelevant because, once again, a single payer system is not on the table, even though I personally would like it to be.
Sure. Lots of competing polls out there. But I would bet a very good steak dinner at our most expensive local steak house that Rasmussen is the one closest to what most people do believe and want on this issue after they have been better informed re what Obama and the Democrats in Congress want to 'do for them'.