55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 02:50 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
slk shock can't see the No Party at work, thinking that if Obama's health plan fails, the conservatives will have a good shot in 2010 to win back congress.

Another bull **** propagated by the republicans is that Obama has said he will continue to try to get bi-partisan participation until the end of September, and after that he's not even going to try to work with the No Party.

The lies being promoted by the health insurance companies spending $1.2 million every day to spread their lies and innuendos are being bought lock stock and barrel by the conservatives. Lie #1: Americans will lose choice of doctors under the Obama plan. FACT #1: Americans will have more choices, and they won't be red-lined based on preexisting medical needs. Lie #2: The government is going to take over health care in the US. FACT #2: Americans will have more choices to choose from public or private plans. Lie #3: Quality will deteriorate. FACT: We already spend the most in this world for health care while 47 million go without insurance, and many of those with insurance have inadequate insurance. Premiums are increasing faster than wages, and many companies are dropping health insurance benefits, because they can no longer afford it. Rather, the insurance companies specify what will be covered and not covered by clerks without medical degrees deciding what is approved or not approved and not the attending physician.

0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 02:52 pm
@ican711nm,
How's that going, constitutional god-like creature?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 02:57 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:
I wrote that among the various estimates--100 thousand to 60 million--for how many slaves were killed by American citizens, I thought--but knew I did not know for certain--the correct number was less than 600 thousand following the adoption of the USA Constitution March 4, 1789.

My point was that USA governments were not ever responsible for killing millions like european and asian governments.


Which European or Asian government, following the adoption of their current founding documents, was responsible for "killing millions"?

Oh, wait... maybe you're saying that it doesn't matter when those governments, in their present form, were actually founded... maybe you're saying that there were people living in Asia and Europe before the adoption of the current founding documents of those nations, and those people back then were still responsible for the deaths of millions of people....
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 03:23 pm
@old europe,
It's no wonder ican is a flight instructor; he still hasn't gotten his feet on the ground. One might say he's a little flighty!
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 03:41 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
cyclo wrote:
Re: slkshock7 (Post 3725221)
slkshock wrote:


Don't know about the rest of you conservatives out there, but I'm increasingly encouraged by the growing backlash against Obama's over-reach. There's an emerging feeling of resurgence and confidence in the GOP as Obama's initiatives fail, his policies go down in flames and his popularity sinks.


I wonder, which of his initiatives have failed?


Which of his initiatives have succeeded?
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 03:48 pm
@slkshock7,
slkshock7 wrote:

cyclo wrote:
Re: slkshock7 (Post 3725221)
slkshock wrote:


Don't know about the rest of you conservatives out there, but I'm increasingly encouraged by the growing backlash against Obama's over-reach. There's an emerging feeling of resurgence and confidence in the GOP as Obama's initiatives fail, his policies go down in flames and his popularity sinks.


I wonder, which of his initiatives have failed?


Which of his initiatives have succeeded?



He passed the stim bill, the budget, and the Lilly Ledbetter pay act. He re-authorized 4 million kids into SCHIP. He changed a bunch of stuff that can be changed by Exec. order.

Which of his initiatives have failed? I wonder if you can name a single one. Generally when folks answer a direct question with another question, it's a sign they cannot answer - and they know it.

Cycloptichorn
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 03:53 pm
@old europe,
The USA has existed for more than 220 years since the 18th century. For the first 76 years of its existence, slavery was legal. I allege that during the first 76 years less than 600,000 slaves were killed by American citizens.

I allege that during the 20th century, millions of european and asian citizens were murdered by their governments.

Neither of my allegations imply that 21st century USA, european, or asian governments or people should be condemned as no damn good.

To be consistent, those people who do condemn the USA as no damn good for enslaving and killing slaves more than 144 years ago, should be consistent and condemn certain european and asian governments as no damn good for enslaving (e.g., imprisoning) and killing slaves less than 76 years ago (e.g., Hitler, Hirohito, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot) .
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 03:57 pm
@ican711nm,
ican, Wrong! Humans are no damn good. We kill needlessly for stupid wars that proves nothing in the long run; our enemies become our friends, and our friends become our enemies. We humans make war machinery that kills more people with one bomb than was possible only a century ago.

Where's your brain?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:01 pm
@slkshock7,
slkshock, You're making one assumption about failure that can't be proven until all the stimulus plan money has been spent, so asking your question is moot. Your failure to understand logic is not our problem. There are many indications that our economy is showing improvements. Those can be considered partial successes. You can't show what has failed, can you?

Are you using the same glazed over crystal ball that most MACs-conservatives are using? Useless.
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:01 pm
@ican711nm,
like a broken record.
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:02 pm
The verdict just came down on Congressman William Jefferson - D - LA - guilty on multiple counts of bribery. No word on what the sentence will be yet, but it could be severe. Possibly well over 200 years.
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:02 pm
@slkshock7,
don't let facts get in your way, dude. rock on.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:06 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
A president does not succeed by signing bills or initiating executive orders. He succeeds by solving problems, and not by making existing problems worse or creating new problems. Obama has made existing problems worse (e.g., increased deficits and increased unemployment) and he has created a new problem (e.g., decreased the USA's GDP ).
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:08 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

The verdict just came down on Congressman William Jefferson - D - LA - guilty on multiple counts of bribery. No word on what the sentence will be yet, but it could be severe. Possibly well over 200 years.


Maybe they'll throw him in the Freezer?

Good riddance to bad rubbish, I say

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:08 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Neither of my allegations imply that 21st century USA, european, or asian governments or people should be condemned as no damn good.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:09 pm
@ican711nm,
If you start counting the victims of a specific government only after their current founding documents were written, then the Federal Republic of Germany, the Russian Federation or the Kingdom of Cambodia are responsible for killing far less human beings than the United States of America.

If you're saying that it's immaterial when the current founding documents of these contemporary nations where written because incredible crimes have been committed on the soil of those countries earlier, then excluding the victims of slavery on the North American continent doesn't make any sense.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:10 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

A president does not succeed by signing bills or initiating executive orders. He succeeds by solving problems, and not by making existing problems worse or creating new problems. Obama has made existing problems worse (e.g., increased deficits and increased unemployment) and he has created a new problem (e.g., decreased the USA's GDP ).


Only in your opinion, Ican. You wouldn't agree with anything he did, b/c he's a moderate-Liberal and you are a wacky, far right-wing, tax-denying nutjob.

Your estimation of Obama is not a determiner of success. Obama's policies have not decreased the nation's GSP and they have not increased unemployment - the mess made by the Republicans over the last several years, with their insistence that the markets and corporations can 'self-regulate,' is responsible for that.

Cycloptichorn
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:13 pm
@DontTreadOnMe,
It's not a broken record. It's a functioning DVD.

Quote:
No inhabitants of North or South America were American citizens of the United States of America before March 4, 1789.

American citizens did not exist prior to March 4, 1789, because the United States of America did not exist prior to March 4, 1789.

Slavery did not exist in the United States of America prior to its existence, but did exist in North America.

Slavery was not legal in the United States of America until the United States of America existed.

Slavery was legal in the United States of America from March 4, 1789 to December 6, 1865.

Slavery ceased being legal in the United States of America on December 6, 1865.
DontTreadOnMe
 
  2  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:15 pm
@ican711nm,
oh no you don't. Very Happy

ican711nm wrote:

My point about the 100 year period July 4, 1776 to July3, 1876 was that Americans killed less than 600 thousand slaves in that period, not 60 or even 6 million. While that is horrible enough, it is no where near as horrible as the millions of civilians European and Asian governments killed in the 20th century.


sounds like a statement of certainty to me. you have no way of knowing for sure.

and when i suggested that you can't ignore the slaves killed by americans prior to the formation of a united american government, you went all cutty pasty on me.



cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:17 pm
@DontTreadOnMe,
It's not only the slaves that Americans killed; they also killed native Americans by the thousands (*if not hundreds of thousands).

From Wiki:
Quote:
War and violence

While epidemic disease was by far the leading cause of the population decline of the American indigenous peoples after 1492, there were other contributing factors, all of them related to European contact and colonization. One of these factors was warfare. According to demographer Russell Thornton, although many lives were lost in wars over the centuries, and war sometimes contributed to the near extinction of certain tribes, warfare and death by other violent means was a comparatively minor cause of overall native population decline.[19]

There is some disagreement among scholars about how widespread warfare was in pre-Columbian America, but there is general agreement that war became deadlier after the arrival of the Europeans and their steel weapons and firearms. The Europeans brought with them gunpowder and steel weapons, which made killing easier and war more deadly. Over the long run, Europeans proved to be consistently successful in achieving domination when engaged in warfare with indigenous Americans, for a variety of reasons. One of the major reasons was the staying power of the Europeans, who could call on a far ranging supply network if required, and could sustain a conflict over several years including the winters if necessary. Almost no Indian tribes had the stored resources to sustain a war for more than a few months. Massive death from disease certainly played a major role in the European conquest, but also decisive was the European approach to war, which was less ritualistic than in native America and more focused on achieving decisive victory. European colonization also contributed to an increased number of wars between displaced native groups as they fought over who should have first access to the new weapons and tools.[20]
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 04/19/2025 at 03:16:58