55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 May, 2008 12:58 pm
A different perspective on the Jeremiah Wright - Obama bruhaha:Note: background on the analogies used is related elsewhere in the piece excerpted

In the real world, a sense of grievance or entitlement, as a result of the mistreatment of your ancestors, is not likely to get you very far with people who are too busy dealing with current economic realities to spend much time thinking about their own ancestors, much less other people's ancestors. , , , ,

Another seemingly unrelated experience was being in a crowd at a graveside in a Jewish cemetery last week. That crowd included people who were black, white, Asian, Catholic, Jewish and no doubt others. This country has come a long way, just in my lifetime.

. . . .We don't need people like either Jeremiah Wright or Barack Obama to take us backward. The time is long overdue to stop gullibly accepting the left's vision of itself as idealistic, rather than self-aggrandizing."
THOMAS SOWELL
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 May, 2008 08:58 pm
Fox - I thought the point was to talk about the flaws of the conservative political philosophy etc?

It seems like you just want to try and drag the Wright thing out as long as you can, and you're looking for any platform where you can post this.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 May, 2008 09:05 pm
Diest TKO wrote:
Fox - I thought the point was to talk about the flaws of the conservative political philosophy etc?

It seems like you just want to try and drag the Wright thing out as long as you can, and you're looking for any platform where you can post this.

T
K
O


And this is a perfect platform for it, isn't it?
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 May, 2008 10:41 pm
What the hell? No. This is not the perfect platform. Not perfect, not even appropriate. The appropriate place is in a thread where Obama or Wright are being discussed.

Bringing it up here, only shows the shallowness of attack.

Edit: Actually, this thread is perfect. A thread that nobady reads anymore is a perfect place to put more useless on-and-on about Rev Wright.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 May, 2008 11:02 pm
And yes, this is the proper forum to discuss the flaws of the conservative perspective and also the virtues of the conservative perspective and/or where the conservative perspective is superior to that of the liberal perspective. Consider again Sowell's take on it:

Quote:


Conservatism does not focus on victimization nor does it presume that any group is inferior to or must be nurtured by Big Brother. Conservatism considers that point of view to be counterproductive if not destructive or down right racist.

So where better to discuss that than here?
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 May, 2008 11:09 pm
If conservatism is so perfect then it should not require the context you are so desperately trying to create.

Sowell's article is just another article to try to liken Obama to Wright and make their actions and ideas synonymous.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 May, 2008 11:13 pm
He did not make them synonymous nor did he....nor have I.....ever said that conservatism is perfect.

What he did say is that they both appeal to feelings of victimization rather than the potential within the people as the recipe to achieve their goals and dreams.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 May, 2008 12:11 am
Diest TKO wrote:
What the hell? No. This is not the perfect platform. Not perfect, not even appropriate. The appropriate place is in a thread where Obama or Wright are being discussed.


You're such a noob.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 May, 2008 04:23 am
Ticomaya wrote:
Diest TKO wrote:
What the hell? No. This is not the perfect platform. Not perfect, not even appropriate. The appropriate place is in a thread where Obama or Wright are being discussed.


You're such a noob.


n00b is spelled with two zeros. And you like to insult my spelling. Rolling Eyes

IRt3h1337!!!1!1one!!!1uno!1!onefactorial1!

T
K
Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 May, 2008 08:48 am
You didn't do any research on the definition or spelling of 'noob' did you. While it can be spelled with two zeros--n00b--it does not HAVE to be spelled with two zeros and usually isn't.

Advice: Precision is not important in philosophy or mental exercises. It is essential in the field of engineering.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 May, 2008 09:53 am
Foxfyre wrote:
You didn't do any research on the definition or spelling of 'noob' did you. While it can be spelled with two zeros--n00b--it does not HAVE to be spelled with two zeros and usually isn't.


Are you kidding? He's never researched the spelling of any word.


noob
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 May, 2008 02:54 pm
This is now offically the best thread in A2K.

LOL

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 May, 2008 08:46 am
Another 'which candidate most reflects your views' site:

http://www.votechooser.com/
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 May, 2008 12:08 pm
And now this. . . .

George Will has raised the questions and I think these are questions that deserve an answer or at least a philosophy--I admit I had to look up the definition for 'peripatetic'.

While I don't think any of the candidates can say specifically what they will do until they know what circumstances they will be facing, I think all should advise us that they are aware of and have given seriously consideration to these issues:

Questions For McCain
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2008 10:15 am
Diest TKO wrote:
If conservatism is so perfect then it should not require the context you are so desperately trying to create.

Sowell's article is just another article to try to liken Obama to Wright and make their actions and ideas synonymous.

T
K
O

They aren't synonymous? What evidence for that?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 May, 2008 08:02 pm
Notice how those who make unsupportable statements flee the thread?

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, this one is almost too dead on accurate to be funny:

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/ca0513dd.jpg
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 May, 2008 08:44 pm
okie wrote:
Diest TKO wrote:
If conservatism is so perfect then it should not require the context you are so desperately trying to create.

Sowell's article is just another article to try to liken Obama to Wright and make their actions and ideas synonymous.

T
K
O

They aren't synonymous? What evidence for that?

No they aren't. And the burden of proof is not for me to prove that something is not. However if it was I'd start with Obama's track record. It does not illustrate the ideas of Rev Wright for which he is being criticized.

Foxfyre - People aren't fleeing, they are becomeing bored. This used to be a pretty good thread when it was a discussion about how the conservative movement has been out of phase with either it's voters or itself. Now it's just another platform for useless babel on things like Rev Wright because people elsewhere don't care anymore.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 May, 2008 10:19 pm
I think it is okay to use current events, especially those which have caught the interest or imagination of the people, for illustration within a discussion of conservative values. Do you disagree that McCain is not tolerated by the left because he is more centrist than right wing? Do you disagree that both Obama and Clinton campaign as more centrist than liberal? That is what the cartoon illustrates.

Is centrist better than left wing? Or right wing? These are valid considerations for discussion.

As for Wright versus Obama, this definitely falls within the scope of conservative values that reject Marxist and socialist doctrines. If you watch and listen closely, both Wright and Obama preach a liberation theology that is softly rooted in Marxism and embraces socialism to a degree that is alarming to conservatives. The difference between the rhetoric of the two is only a matter of degree, emphasis, and semantics.

If you agree emotionally with the doctrine, it sounds really good. For conservatives who do not, it is scary stuff.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 May, 2008 10:46 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
As for Wright versus Obama, this definitely falls within the scope of conservative values that reject Marxist and socialist doctrines. If you watch and listen closely, both Wright and Obama preach a liberation theology that is softly rooted in Marxism and embraces socialism to a degree that is alarming to conservatives.



Well, it's commonly known that the encyclicals Rerum Novarum, Quadragesimo Anno, and Centesimus Annus were actually written by Marx, Engels and Lenin and not by Leo XIII, Pius XI and John Paul II. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 May, 2008 11:49 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
As for Wright versus Obama, this definitely falls within the scope of conservative values that reject Marxist and socialist doctrines.


Can you say Israel?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 09/16/2024 at 03:40:32