@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:
If the US missile defense system is so bogus, then why is Russia so upset about it? If there is no merit to it, why are European nations so eager to benefit from it?
Sorry to muddy up the thread with missile defense, but a few pages back, I cited this issue as one example of Reagan being right, yet there are those naysayers still around proclaiming it is worthless, it will never work, etc. Their dislike of Reagan is so severe as to muddy up whatever logical thinking ability they may have. When a test had never been done, they said that could not be done, when one test was done, they said it was a fluke under controlled conditions, and then when several have been done, they said only some of them worked, and now when actual deployment is being considered, they are saying it won't work under real conditions, with multiple missiles being shot, with detection avoidance being counter deployed, and so forth. One wonders how such people can believe in the far fetched computer modeling of global warming? How come their skepticism is aimed at much lesser scientific problems and complexities?
Yes, I would hope we never have to see if an actual attack can be thwarted, partially thwarted, or reduced in severity, but I believe something is better than nothing when it comes to potential nuclear attack.