55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 11:53 am
The American people are increasingly suspect of this health care bill. The exact opposite is happening as more and more people find out what's in it.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 11:55 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:

The American people are increasingly suspect of this health care bill. The exact opposite is happening as more and more people find out what's in it.


Do you perhaps have polling data that shows this to be true? I doubt it.

Cycloptichorn
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 11:57 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

What you are doing is attacking the messenger rather than the message.

The link is here. I still want you to challenge the statement about adding 30 million more patients to a health care system that's already stretched to max.

http://savingcommonsense.blogspot.com/2010/10/first-problems-of-obamacare-and-health.html


That guys whole argument is one assertion after another. It's a projection of what WILL happen but contains no proof about what IS happening. That's not compelling in the slightest.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 12:02 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Quote:
Gallup Shows More Bad News for Obamacare
9:33 AM, Mar 22, 2011 • By JEFFREY H. ANDERSON
Single Page Print Larger Text Smaller Text


Polls show that Obamacare, which was highly unpopular at the time of its passage, is even less popular today. And Gallup’s most recently released poll offers further evidence to that effect. However, the poll’s headline—“One Year Later, Americans Split on Healthcare Law” — suggests otherwise and is exactly the kind of straw at which the Obama administration likes to grasp. So the headline’s claim is worth addressing.
/><p class=

Gallup elaborates a bit in its write-up: “One year after President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law, Americans are divided on its passage, with 46% saying it was a good thing and 44% saying it was a bad thing.” But Gallup also references “polling conducted a year ago, just before President Obama signed the bill into law.” It writes, “At that point, in response to a slightly different question” (the only differences were that “yesterday” became “a year ago,” “the U.S. House of Representatives” became “Congress,” and “bill” became “law”), “49% said the law was a good thing, while 40% said it was a bad thing.”

So Obamacare was supposedly favored by 9 points at that time — a tally that only the truly credulous could believe, and one that presumably explains why the Democrats did so well in November — and now is favored by only 2. So even this poll shows a 7-point decline in Obamacare’s margin of support in the intervening year.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 12:12 pm
@cicerone imposter,
The Weekly Standard?

Are you just not going to respond to the fact that on one hand, you trash Republicans and their media allies, but on the other, you turn to them for proof for your position? This is a big problem, CI.

Given that polling regularly has a margin of error of +-4% or more, small changes in approval like that over the course of a year are statistically meaningless. If there were a true drop in approval you'd see much bigger swings than a few points.

I would also point out that the number of Americans, per the article you quoted, who favor the law STILL outnumbers those who don't favor the law. Not exactly strong evidence of your position.

Cycloptichorn
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 01:54 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cyclo, Rationalize all you want about the polls; you still haven't provided the answer to the supply and demand question. How will the US health care system taken in more than 30 million more patients without rationing them in a system that's already stretched to the max? Simple question.

Also, I've always been an advocate for universal health care in this country. That's fact you will not be able to deny.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 01:58 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Cyclo, Rationalize all you want about the polls; you still haven't provided the answer to the supply and demand question. How will the US health care system taken in more than 30 million more patients without rationing them in a system that's already stretched to the max? Simple question.


The truth is that these 30 million people are ALREADY in our system: they just go to the emergency room or an emergency clinic instead of their primary physician . It's fallacious to say that 30 million are being 'added' to the system. These people are simply going to have insurance instead of not having it.

Many of these folks are younger and will go years without seeing ANY doctor at all. I never did when I was that age. Nevertheless, they will have access to insurance and a doctor in case an accident happens. Right now, they have these accidents and then strain the system by hitting up emergency services and never paying.

You shouldn't take your economic arguments from right-wing sites, because they regularly lie and use bad logic to come up with those arguments!!! Just today, on the other thread, you stated:

Quote:

That's the conservative way; they never admit their lies, but repeat them with abandon.
okie is a good example of the conservative way; he even has the chutzpah to ask us to look for his lies. When we cut and paste them; he ignores us.


You can't honestly believe this and then turn right around and quote conservative sources, as if their arguments are valid ones!!! There's a big disconnect here.

Cycloptichorn
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 02:08 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
ha ha ha... it seems you'll protect your position no matter how you attempt to rationalize it without understanding the realities of those you claim are already covered. Many seniors and handicapped who are covered do not see their doctors, because of the cost. It's a choice between seeing their doctor by paying the attendant fee or to eat; guess what they pick as their priority? That also goes for meds. Most find the cost prohibitive.

According the the latest stats, 36 million are uninsured, and 58% have private insurance.

You probably also have not heard about the waiting period for Medicare patients with potential access barriers for disabled adults. Those are realities of the current system, and ObamaCare will not cure those problems.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 02:15 pm
@cicerone imposter,
And? It's not a magical fairy bill that will make everything into chocolate-covered candy roses overnight!!! It's an effort to improve the current system, and an effort that was severely watered down by intransigence from the opposition, who knows very well that once Universal Health Care is in place they'll never dislodge it from our society - because everyone around the world who has it considers it a fundamental part of society's obligation to our citizens.

You're letting Perfect be the enemy of Good. The truth is that the bill improves our current situation by a lot. You ought to acknowledge that.

Cycloptichorn
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 02:16 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:

The American people are increasingly suspect of this health care bill.


Truth
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 02:20 pm


Cyclotroll rarely speaks the truth... I can't recall the last time he didn't repeat a lie while apologizing for PrezBO's growing list of failures.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 02:24 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Who's talking about chocolate covered candy? ObamaCare was sloppily implemented with many unanswered issues including the logistics. It was not planned well, and ignored all the existing problems with those who already have insurance.

A good plan would have taken all these issues into consideration, and implemented the plan in steps - and revised as needed. But ObamaCare has too many problems associated with the implementation and effect it will have no those already with insurance, and those we wish to cover.

It was sloppy.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 02:28 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Who's talking about chocolate covered candy? ObamaCare was sloppily implemented with many unanswered issues including the logistics.


What? It doesn't even go into full effect until 2014. That's three years from now. You expect everything to be perfect right out the gate? C'mon.

Quote:
It was not planned well, and ignored all the existing problems with those who already have insurance.


I don't think that it did indeed ignore those problems at all. I've read extensively on the subject and I can't make it any clearer than that. In fact, the HCR actively improves the insurance situation for ALL Americans by ending a variety of odious practices. Once again - you oughta admit this is true, because that's a fact, not an opinion of mine.

Quote:
A good plan would have taken all these issues into consideration, and implemented the plan in steps - and revised as needed.


The plan IS being implemented in steps. I don't know how you could possibly think it isn't.

Quote:
But ObamaCare has too many problems associated with the implementation and effect it will have no those already with insurance, and those we wish to cover.

It was sloppy.


Whole lot of assertions here, zero facts. I can't stop you from having whatever opinion you like. But your argument isn't compelling.

Cycloptichorn
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 02:46 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Agreed.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 02:46 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
You actually believe that three more years are going to resolve all of the problems of ObamaCare? How many more doctors, nurses, and hospitals are in the works? How will three more years answer the issue of cost for seniors and the handicapped? How about those who will end up paying more for private plans?
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 02:48 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

You actually believe that three more years are going to resolve all of the problems of ObamaCare?


No, I don't! But it will resolve SOME of them.

Once again, you're letting Perfect be the enemy of Good. I never claimed the bill was perfect; indeed, there are a lot of elements that got stripped out which should have remained. But it's far better than what we currently have.

Quote:
How many more doctors, nurses, and hospitals are in the works? How will three more years answer the issue of cost for seniors and the handicapped? How about those who will end up paying more for private plans?


I've already addressed the supposed 'shortage' of doctors. You let me know when that ACTUALLY occurs, instead of just being projected to occur by some right-wing blogger.

Saying 'what about those who will pay more for private plans' is also fallacious. People's plans have ALREADY been skyrocketing in price over the last decade. The only question is whether this bill will lower the rate of increase or not.

Cycloptichorn
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 02:58 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Let you know when it occurs?

This is from the NYT.

Quote:
Shortage of Doctors an Obstacle to Obama Goals

By ROBERT PEAR
Published: April 26, 2009

WASHINGTON — Obama administration officials, alarmed at doctor shortages, are looking for ways to increase the supply of physicians to meet the needs of an aging population and millions of uninsured people who would gain coverage under legislation championed by the president.
Multimedia
Primary Care Providers in Short SupplyGraphic
Primary Care Providers in Short Supply

The officials said they were particularly concerned about shortages of primary care providers who are the main source of health care for most Americans.

One proposal — to increase Medicare payments to general practitioners, at the expense of high-paid specialists — has touched off a lobbying fight.

Family doctors and internists are pressing Congress for an increase in their Medicare payments. But medical specialists are lobbying against any change that would cut their reimbursements. Congress, the specialists say, should find additional money to pay for primary care and should not redistribute dollars among doctors — a difficult argument at a time of huge budget deficits.

Some of the proposed solutions, while advancing one of President Obama’s goals, could frustrate others. Increasing the supply of doctors, for example, would increase access to care but could make it more difficult to rein in costs.

The need for more doctors comes up at almost every Congressional hearing and White House forum on health care. “We’re not producing enough primary care physicians,” Mr. Obama said at one forum. “The costs of medical education are so high that people feel that they’ve got to specialize.” New doctors typically owe more than $140,000 in loans when they graduate.


So, are you going to argue against Obama that we're not producing enough doctors?
okie
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 04:26 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Just pay jillions of dollars to make kids go to medical school, problem solved.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 07:10 pm
@okie,
Well, isn't the government solution always throwing more money at a problem?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2011 07:19 pm
@okie,
okie, Do you have solutions for our country without spending money? You should share this important concept with our government - at all levels.

What would be your first recommendation?

Do you think they can handle Libya without spending money?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 12:36:30