@okie,
No, okie, you have no idea what you are ranting on about. Let me clue thee in: at a meeting of one of the two departments in which I teach, the women I work with -- all over 30 at the youngest, all with master's degrees or more -- shop at thrift stores. How would you tax products sold at thrifts?
Were I to purchase the same clothes -- $4 cashmere sweaters, $10 Zelda pants, $5 blazers with Adolfo or Talbot's labels -- from their original vendors, then they might be taxed at a rate that would mean something to American coffers. As it is, they do not.
Furthermore, when you consider that my gross income (can you spend your gross, okie?) for 2010 was less than $25,000, and I spent $42/month for 9 months of the year on tolls; $3,000 on real estate taxes and $1,600 on homeowners and auto insurance ($4,978 in total just to drive and maintain a homestead), you know I did not have much left over to spend.
I am not atypical.
Let's see, I spent a total of $870 on wood pellets to heat the house, but there was still gas, electricity, cell phone and internet to pay. Oh, and food, but, I suppose, under your scheme, you would tax that as well. Union dues were about $350.
So, okie, I would think that if you were in my shoes, I would say, having "common sense" that a sales tax is a splendid!
Well, it isn't and a sales tax simply would not support . . . oh, let's see . . . how about the war in Afghanistan in which my son is serving.