55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Nov, 2010 07:58 pm
@ican711nm,


YOU IDIOT! YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE NEW WORLD ORDER IS!
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Nov, 2010 08:00 pm
@realjohnboy,
ican obviously is thumbed down: when I opened this thread, all of his posts were thumbed down. Nothing prevents him from repeating and repeating and repeating them.

You know how people yell at the deaf? Well, ican, with his large type, must think we are all blind.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 24 Nov, 2010 10:18 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
Perhaps, more Democrats are in the bottom four quintiles.
Are Democrats part of the problem, or part of the solution? If Democrats are not excelling or earning as much, thus not paying their fair share of taxes, how come?
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 02:02 pm
@okie,
Democrats are not liberals in the sense of putting an equal sign between the two words. When you learn that, we will all be happier.
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 02:03 pm
@plainoldme,
That said, I wonder if the follow up is that more Democrats might be aware of being in the stagnant bottom four quintiles and the reasons why they are there than the Republicans who are also in the lower echelons.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Fri 26 Nov, 2010 10:41 am
George Soros repeatedly declares his objective to be a "a new world order" with the USA one of its subordinates. On December 9, 2004, Eli Pariser, then head of Soros's Moveon PAC, declared, "Now the Democratic Party is our party. We bought it, we own it.” Obama is an employee of George Soros. The Obama government is our enemy.

Leftist Liberals repeatedly malign those with whom they disagree. They do so because they do not know why they believe what they say they believe, or because they do not actually believe what they say they believe!

Leftist liberals seek to secure what they allege is their right to steal wealth others earn.
Rightist liberals seek to secure what they allege is their right to retain wealth they earn.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 26 Nov, 2010 11:18 am
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:

Democrats are not liberals in the sense of putting an equal sign between the two words. When you learn that, we will all be happier.
I think not all Democrats are liberals, but almost all liberals vote Democrat, if they vote at all. A good example is cicerone imposter, who claims to be an independent, and no doubt he is registered that way, but there is also not much doubt that he votes for Democrats most of the time, and he also favors Democratic or liberal policies most of the time. That is unless he has been lying to us on this forum. For most practical purposes, Democrat = Liberal. As is being accurately pointed out by ican and I, on December 9, 2004, Eli Pariser, then head of Soros's Moveon PAC, declared, "Now the Democratic Party is our party. We bought it, we own it.” So unless anyone is prepared to argue the illogical, that Soros is not a liberal, then the Democratic Party is now owned and directed by liberals and for liberal policicies. Here is what happened to propel Obama into office: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_20100920/ai_n56169340/
"The first shots in the Obama Revolution, the highly unlikely campaign that elevated an inexperienced former Chicago community organizer bom in Hawaii and raised in indonesia into the Oval Office, were fired at the Southampton, Long Island, beach house of billionaire hedge fund manager George Soros.
Soros is one of the wealthiest men on the planet, with a personal fortune of at least $7 billion and additional investments of another $11 billion or so. His collaborative group of pro-left foundations distributes more than $400 million a year to causes ranging from underwriting left-leaning Democratic Party candidates, to legalizing marijuana.
It was at a highly secretive meeting in the summer of 2002 that Soros, Morton Halperin. (the director of Soros' Open Society Institute), John Podest� (the former Clinton White House chief of staff). Jeremy Rosner (a former speechwriter for Bill Clinton), Robert Boorstin (a Democratic strategist and also a former speechwriter. for Clinton) and Carl Pope (a Democratic strategist and environmentalist) met to draft a plan to defeat President George W. Bush in the election of 2004.
Ultimately, Soros would spend approximately $26 million of his own money in a failed mission to rid America of Bush. It was through this effort, however, that Soros gave birth to a much more ominous cause, the "Shadow Party," which would eventually become the Obama Admimstration. And George Soros would become the master puppeteer for the President of the United States.
Without Soros and the Shadow Party, Obama would be, at best, a senator from Illinois attending social gatherings with domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn and listening to the black liberation Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Instead, Barack Obama is President of the United States."
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Nov, 2010 09:45 pm
Any one curious about the palin clan is perceived abroad?

Here is the work of one animator:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYQLD0Kpmsk
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Fri 26 Nov, 2010 09:45 pm
@plainoldme,
It's nothing more than they deserve.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 26 Nov, 2010 09:52 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:
Quote:
Without Soros and the Shadow Party, Obama would be, at best, a senator from Illinois attending social gatherings with domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn and listening to the black liberation Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Instead, Barack Obama is President of the United States." [/b]

0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Sat 27 Nov, 2010 01:00 pm
Quote:
In April 2005 the Soros funded Campus Progress web site posted this headline: "An Invitation to Help Design the Constitution in 2020" (This was an invitation to a Yale law School Conference on "The Constitution of 2020: a progressive vision of what the Constitution ought to be.")
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Nov, 2010 11:18 pm
@ican711nm,
Yawn! I think it is time for bed. Good night!
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Sun 28 Nov, 2010 07:19 pm
@okie,
Isn't George Soros the guy who has his forearm surgically planted up Glenn Beck's butt and is in control of that Manchurian Lunatic?
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 12:45 pm
@parados,
Isn't George Soros the guy who has his forearm surgically planted up the Manchurian Lunatics ass controlling PrezBO's every move ?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 04:44 pm
George Soros wrote:
I do not accept the rules imposed by others. If I did, I would not be alive today. I am a law-abiding citizen, but I recognize that there are regimes that need to be opposed rather than accepted. And in periods of regime change, the normal rules don't apply. One needs to adjust one's behavior to the changing circumstances.

My goal is to become the conscience of the world.

These are not normal times.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 05:58 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:

Isn't George Soros the guy who has his forearm surgically planted up Glenn Beck's butt and is in control of that Manchurian Lunatic?
No, Soros is the guy that thinks he owns the Democratic Party, and so it seems likely that he has much inflence over most of the party's policies. Where have you been, parados? I recommend you get up to speed on Soros.
talk72000
 
  2  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 06:59 pm
Nuthin like the 3 Stooges in a row! Mr. Green
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 07:56 pm
@okie,
I recommend you get up to speed okie..

The Manchurian Lunatic
okie
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 08:28 pm
@parados,
parados, I don't need to read your slanted links, to know already that he who controls the purse strings controls what happens. Soros owns the Democratic Party for all practical purposes, so you need to find out about Soros, what he believes, and what he is trying to do, and then you will have a better understanding of who Obama is and what he is up to.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 08:32 pm
@okie,
Quote:
parados, I don't need to read your slanted links, to know already that he who controls the purse strings controls what happens.

Right okie, which is why the Koch brothers own the GOP, right?

Or does it only happen if you give LESS than the Koch brothers?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.15 seconds on 07/14/2025 at 05:33:47