55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
georgeob1
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 10:39 am
Walter, It appears that you have made a new and devoted fan. Laughing
okie
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 12:11 pm
@georgeob1,
I hope it makes Walter proud!!!! Smile
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 12:16 pm
@plainoldme,
Why don't you try writing novels? You have a flair for fiction.
0 Replies
 
talk72000
 
  2  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 12:22 pm
@cicerone imposter,
The Americans have taken to crapology of Ayn Rand.
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 01:56 pm
@talk72000,
Are you as sick of ican's immaturity as I am? As for okie and his inability to remember what he posted, well, there is a real problem there. Whether it is a mental condition or running too many sock puppets at once, is difficult to figure out.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 03:11 pm
@plainoldme,
No, I am not confusing my words with yours.
The questions I asked were directly aimed at what you wrote, AND what I quoted.
There was no confusion about what I was responding to.

I note however that you refuse to answer them.
All you have done is admit that you would not raise a child if the father was someone you hated.
Tell me, does that also apply to kids already born?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 03:33 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

Insteresting opinion. Can you also explain what the difference is between a left-Fascist and a right-Fascist, and why the difference defines them left or right?


Well, I really don't know what you've learnt in history at school and how and where you've been taught about pokitical sciences.
Quoting from Encyclopaedia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, Chicago, 2011:
Quote:
[...]fascist parties and movements differed significantly from each other, they had many characteristics in common, including extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social hierarchy and the rule of elites, and the desire to create a Volksgemeinschaft (German: “people's community”), in which individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the nation.


And when you've read this, okie, you may get that these ideas may be either (but rarely in history) following more left or more right (what was more common in history) ideas and ideology.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 03:36 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

I would like to add another question to my previous response to this. I find this statement by you to be very fascinating. I would also like you to tell us if there are also left-Communists as well as right-Communists? After all, that would be just as logical, wouldn't it?


As said above: I really don't know from where and how you got your "knowledge" ...

I mean, it's really sometimes quite funny, to mix terms of certain categories and play with them ...

.... but using therm "logical" here isn't funny but shows a lot of ...
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 03:45 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:
the Nazis had a basic philosophy of "Common Good over individual Good," which is clearly leftist and anti-conservative or anti-individual freedom, liberty, and responsibility.



Well, our "fathers of the basic law" proudly wrote that "Property entails obligations. Its use shall also serve the public good."

That is in your opinion ...

And what we call Christian principles here (you should read what the the Evangelical resistance fighter Bonhoeffer wrote and why the Nazis executed him!) ... never mind, you obviously have a different "education".
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 03:54 pm
@JamesMorrison,
JamesMorrison wrote:

Regarding my questioning Walter and the responses he has been gracious enough to supply us with, something is becoming quite apparent which you also probably noticed. Our American idea of conservative political thought is, if not alien, certainly unfamiliar to those citizens of Europe like Walter. This is admittedly a generalization but given my (American) experience with European political thought this is where my thoughts are presently taking me. Perhaps you and I are forgetting that before WWI there was a powerful socialist element in European politics, for whatever reason. That would indicate that a socialist mindset has been given just about three full generations (30years) to reach maturity. This, of course, means that even if there was any historical evidence in Europe of the kind of government we Americans initially possessed, its institutional and societal existence would be long extinguished by now. But does Europe have any such history? I think not. Before Bismarck's socialism we find Monarchy and Nationalism but nothing even approaching American Republican style democracy.



I'm really more than surprised.

I'd thought that I knew a bit about this period (at least, it was enough to get an university degree both in the UK as well as in Germany).
But I must have missed a lot, I suppose.

And we do have a different view, too: Bismarck is seen as THE example of a conservative politician as is especially his policy as chancellor of Prussia (and later the German Reich) - thus his nickname.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 04:29 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

okie wrote:

Insteresting opinion. Can you also explain what the difference is between a left-Fascist and a right-Fascist, and why the difference defines them left or right?

Well, I really don't know what you've learnt in history at school and how and where you've been taught about pokitical sciences.
Quoting from Encyclopaedia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, Chicago, 2011:
Quote:
[...]fascist parties and movements differed significantly from each other, they had many characteristics in common, including extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social hierarchy and the rule of elites, and the desire to create a Volksgemeinschaft (German: “people's community”), in which individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the nation.


And when you've read this, okie, you may get that these ideas may be either (but rarely in history) following more left or more right (what was more common in history) ideas and ideology.

Okay, maybe we are getting somewhere in this debate? Let us take the common characteristics as given by Encyclopaedia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, Chicago, 2011.
1. - extreme militaristic nationalism - I do not think this is necessarily indicative of either left or right, especially not right, because we know about the militaristic nature of the old Soviet Union, also North Korea, etc.
2. - contempt for electoral democracy and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social hierarchy and the rule of elites - This one I believe you would have a very tough time assigning to a right leaning philosophy. It correlates more with the idea that a democratic republic and parliamentism is inefficient and that a strong central state is more efficient. Such implies that if you belong to the party and work your way up within the political ruling class, you can be part of some kind of dictatorship, that is the way I would interpret that, Walter, and that is no way a conservative or right leaning philosophy at all.
3. - the desire to create a Volksgemeinschaft (German: “people's community”), in which individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the nation. - This is the clincher in my opinion, Walter, as this is unquestionably left leaning, definitely not conservative or right leaning at all. Conservatism clearly believes in individual rights and interests, not to be taken from us in the supposed interest of common good, or some such belief that the State should be the arbitor of what is good for the people or community, such as wealth redistribution, outlawing any income that does not arise from "work," the outlawing of trusts, and the confiscation of property and businesses when it suits the good of the whole instead of the individual, which is of course determined by the ruling class and or a dictator.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 04:46 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

okie wrote:
the Nazis had a basic philosophy of "Common Good over individual Good," which is clearly leftist and anti-conservative or anti-individual freedom, liberty, and responsibility.



Well, our "fathers of the basic law" proudly wrote that "Property entails obligations. Its use shall also serve the public good."

If I am understanding you correctly, you are referring to the basic law of present day Germany. I cannot analyze exactly what that means, except that yes, even in this country property entails obligations as well, such as meeting zoning codes, paying taxes, etc. However, if the government begins to confiscate property for the public good, then it might be crossing the line into a leftist philosophy, depending upon how prevalent the property confiscations are and for what purpose they are.

In this country, the various governments can have the power to condemn and take property for the purpose of building a road or maybe a school or something like that, but the practice is fairly limited to a pretty narrow interpretation of what is allowed. In fact, I believe there was a case of a city somewhere, perhaps New Jersey, that condemned a bunch of city property so that it could be developed to greatly enhance the tax base for the city. That was considered at the time to be liberal and leftist in nature, and anti-conservative, because the government was abusing the individual rights of property owners for a supposed higher or common good.

Quote:
That is in your opinion ...

I don't know what you were referring to?

Quote:
And what we call Christian principles here (you should read what the the Evangelical resistance fighter Bonhoeffer wrote and why the Nazis executed him!) ... never mind, you obviously have a different "education".

I am not familiar with Bonhoeffer and what he believed, Walter, perhaps you can tell me? I am going to guess that by the time of his execution, Hitler was pretty much doing away with anyone and everyone that opposed him, without regard for whether they were leftists or right leaning conservative in nature.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 04:54 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

okie wrote:

I would like to add another question to my previous response to this. I find this statement by you to be very fascinating. I would also like you to tell us if there are also left-Communists as well as right-Communists? After all, that would be just as logical, wouldn't it?


As said above: I really don't know from where and how you got your "knowledge" ...

I mean, it's really sometimes quite funny, to mix terms of certain categories and play with them ...
Walter, you are the one to say that there were left leaning Fascists and right leaning Fascists, not me. I agree, I thought you were being quite funny when you mixed the terms and played with them. I am simply asking for clarification. After all, if there can be left and right Fascists, then it would seem logical to me that there might also be left and right communists, at least it was worth asking you the question. I am simply trying to figure out what your superior thinking and more educated ability can say about this.

Quote:
.... but using therm "logical" here isn't funny but shows a lot of ...

Logic does exist, Walter, and I think it can be applied to politics. It is not rocket science or the exclusive property of intellectual elites.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Oct, 2010 06:44 pm
@okie,
okie, How did you dream up right-communists and left-communists? Was that difficult, or is that natural with you?
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Sun 10 Oct, 2010 12:40 am
@okie,
okie wrote:
Walter, you are the one to say that there were left leaning Fascists and right leaning Fascists, not me.


Actually, it's not me saying such. I'm just using definitions which are genrally accepted, since decades, even in the USA ...

okie, I honestly think that you should get educated about various terms, how they are used -generally, not just by you- and what they mean.


I'm out of this discussion.
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 10 Oct, 2010 12:26 pm
Leftist liberals seek to secure their right to steal wealth others earn.

Rightist liberals seek to secure their right to retain wealth they earn.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Reply Sun 10 Oct, 2010 02:52 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

okie, How did you dream up right-communists and left-communists? Was that difficult, or is that natural with you?

It was a logical question that I thought of as a result of Walter's assertion that there are left Fascists and right Fascists. Upon reading that assertion by Walter, I asked him the next logical question, could there also be left Communists and right Communists?
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Sun 10 Oct, 2010 02:53 pm
@okie,
okie, It only shows you have no concept of logic.

Is there a right god or left god? That's also an illogical question.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Sun 10 Oct, 2010 03:00 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

okie wrote:
Walter, you are the one to say that there were left leaning Fascists and right leaning Fascists, not me.

Actually, it's not me saying such. I'm just using definitions which are genrally accepted, since decades, even in the USA ...

okie, I honestly think that you should get educated about various terms, how they are used -generally, not just by you- and what they mean.

If it was not you saying it, please tell us who said that and document the supposed fact that it is generally accepted, for decades, even in the USA you claim. You are the one that made the claim, and now you are making the claim that it has been generally accepted. I think that might be news to a great many folks, Walter, so I think it is wholly reasonable to ask you to provide the references that back up your claims.

You say I need to get educated about various terms, okay, I will await you to provide your superior knowledge and historical expertise. It should be not much trouble for you to simply provide the authoritative references for this if it is so commonly known.

Quote:
I'm out of this discussion.

Why? That seems pretty cowardly and why would you leave when you have finally been given the chance to educate me as well as others about what I should have known all along about some of these terms, such as left Fascists and right Fascists? And I am still curious, if there can be left and right Fascists, I asked another question that begs an answer, can there also be left communists and right communists? It should not be difficult for you to answer, given your vast and superior knowledge of history and political movements, Walter.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Sun 10 Oct, 2010 04:31 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

okie, It only shows you have no concept of logic.

Is there a right god or left god? That's also an illogical question.

God is not a political system, ci.

Walter's assertion that there is left Facism as well as right facism was fascinating to me, and I thought it begged the obvious question of him, whether he thought there were also leftist communism and right communism.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.02 seconds on 08/10/2025 at 06:49:43