@Cycloptichorn,
He's marching towards an election Cyclo. If the electorate is marching in those directions so will he. He's a politician and they know upon which side the bread is buttered.
Those paying for Obamacare are more articulate than those benefitting from it, as groups, but they only have one vote each despite the latter lot being skint and onto something for nothing. The universal franchise might turn out to be not as good an idea as its starry-eyed promoters thought thanks to them having a starry-eyed view of human nature.
Marx can't be discredited because of the Soviet failure, if such it is, and nor can one rule out a benign dictatorship. There's a direction to events. Spengler predicted our decline a hundred years ago partly based on the ruling classes failing to reproduce themselves, as happened in ancient Rome. They get too indulgent with their wealth to be bothered with bloody babies caterwauling half the night and shitting their nappy full. There are so many other interesting things to do. Oh--they might have one or two to be considered normal, or for the novelty, but as a class, they don't keep their end up.
I have no idea which direction we should be marching in. I never have had apart from a brief period in active politics but I was only acting. For both sides of course. One can't get a balanced view unless you do that. They were identical in the back rooms apart from accents and other insignia of reds (socialist here) and blues (conservatives).
There's no need to be defensive about marching in those directions. The left agenda is about nothing else. It shows you're winning. And the respectable right has been cowed into accepting most of it. And it may be a necessary direction. Who knows?