55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
mysteryman
 
  0  
Reply Thu 16 Sep, 2010 11:00 pm
@plainoldme,
Then why arent you sponsoring a telethon or a fundraiser to help those poor unfortunate people that are conservatives?

You should be willing to donate out of your own pocket to conservatives, just so they dont have to experience the stigma of being a conservative in a public place.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2010 09:44 am
@okie,
Quote:
. The argument by the liberal lobby here has been that even if the Nazi 25 points were leftist or socialist, Hitler did not govern that way, that he governed as a right winger or conservative.


Oh, really? Can you link to those arguments? Because I think you have just created a straw man.

If you read the arguments that have been presented to you, you will see that the vast majority who disagree with you have specifically said that it's not right to label Hitler as either a Liberal or a Conservative, because in truth his goals had nothing to do with how the country was governed and everything to do with absolute power on his part. That's neither Liberal nor Conservative.



Cycloptichorn
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2010 11:27 am
@plainoldme,
Not really. There is very little wrong with real conservatism, but what has happened to the party is no longer conservatism. They are the divisive party with their primary aim to ignore the American people, and win elections as the No Party. They didn't even support the Small Business legislation recently passed by congress.

They are no longer what can be termed "conservative." They are more like the "destruction" party.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2010 01:41 pm
Hitler’s 25 points evolved from Hitler’s version of socialism.
Quote:

http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/25points.htm
The 25 Points of Hitler's Nazi Party
1. We demand the union of all Germans in a Great Germany on the basis of the principle of self-determination of all peoples.
2. We demand that the German people have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain shall be abrogated.
3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the maintenance of our people and the settlement of our surplus population.
4. Only those who are our fellow countrymen can become citizens. Only those who have German blood, regardless of creed, can be our countrymen. Hence no Jew can be a countryman.
5. Those who are not citizens must live in Germany as foreigners and must be subject to the law of aliens.
6. The right to choose the government and determine the laws of the State shall belong only to citizens. We therefore demand that no public office, of whatever nature, whether in the central government, the province, or the municipality, shall be held by anyone who is not a citizen.
We wage war against the corrupt parliamentary administration whereby men are appointed to posts by favor of the party without regard to character and fitness.
7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens (non-citizens) must be expelled from the Reich.
8. Any further immigration of non-Germans must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.
9. All citizens must possess equal rights and duties.
10. The first duty of every citizen must be to work mentally or physically. No individual shall do any work that offends against the interest of the community to the benefit of all.
Therefore we demand:
11. That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.
12. Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
13. We demand the nationalization of all trusts.
14. We demand profit-sharing in large industries.
15. We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions.
16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.
17. We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.

18. We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished with death, regardless of creed or race.
19. We demand that Roman law, which serves a materialist ordering of the world, be replaced by German common law.
20. In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State.
21. The State has the duty to help raise the standard of national health by providing maternity welfare centers
, by prohibiting juvenile labor, by increasing physical fitness through the introduction of compulsory games and gymnastics, and by the greatest possible encouragement of associations concerned with the physical education of the young.
22. We demand the abolition of the regular army and the creation of a national (folk) army.
23. We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press. In order to make possible the creation of a German press, we demand:
(a) All editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens.
(b) Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State. They must not be published in the German language.
(c) All financial interests in or in any way affecting German newspapers shall be forbidden to non-Germans by law, and we demand that the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper and the expulsion of the non-Germans from the Reich.
Newspapers transgressing against the common welfare shall be suppressed. We demand legal action against those tendencies in art and literature that have a disruptive influence upon the life of our folk, and that any organizations that offend against the foregoing demands shall be dissolved.
24. We demand freedom for all religious faiths in the state, insofar as they do not endanger its existence or offend the moral and ethical sense of the Germanic race.
The party as such represents the point of view of a positive Christianity without binding itself to any one particular confession. It fights against the Jewish materialist spirit within and without, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our folk can only come about from within on the pinciple:
COMMON GOOD BEFORE INDIVIDUAL GOOD
25. In order to carry out this program we demand: the creation of a strong central authority in the State, the unconditional authority by the political central parliament of the whole State and all its organizations.
The formation of professional committees and of committees representing the several estates of the realm, to ensure that the laws promulgated by the central authority shall be carried out by the federal states.
The leaders of the party undertake to promote the execution of the foregoing points at all costs, if necessary at the sacrifice of their own lives.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2010 02:19 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

Hitler’s 25 points evolved from Hitler’s version of socialism.


Just to make it clear again:
- that wasn't "Hitler's program" but the party program of the "Deutsche Arbeiterpartei" (DAP) whose name was changed the other day (February 20, 1920) to NSDAP.


And so on, etc pp ....



NB: ever heard of the principle of bonum commune, okie/ican?
Thus, every (well, at least all major 10, 15 parties) had "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" in their party programs ....
ican711nm
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2010 04:41 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:

http://www.crusader.net/texts/mk/index.html
Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler
Volume Two: The National Socialist Movement
Chapter I: Philosophy and Party
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ON FEBRUARY 24, 1920, the first great public demonstration of our young movement took place. In the Festsaal of the Munich Hofbräuhaus the twenty-five theses of the new party's program were submitted to a crowd of almost two thousand and every single point was accepted amid jubilant approval. ...

cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2010 04:46 pm
@ican711nm,
Programs are those which are followed by the people who develop them. If they are not followed, they are just words on paper, and doesn't mean much. Have you ever studied logic? Printed words have meanings. If they are not acted upon, they are empty of any meaning.

e.g. "I will go to Africa next year." Doesn't mean much if I never intended to go to Africa.
ican711nm
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2010 06:23 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Printed words "not acted upon ... are empty of meaning?"
………………~~~~~~~!??!??! ~~~~~~
………………..~~~~~~~
(O|O) ~~~~
…………………~~~~~
( \~o~/ )
~~~~
………………..
LEFTIST LIBERAL NONSENSE
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  2  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2010 06:43 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
From the lovely, the talented okie:

Quote:
Quote:
. The argument by the liberal lobby here has been that even if the Nazi 25 points were leftist or socialist, Hitler did not govern that way, that he governed as a right winger or conservative.


Interestingly, Obama governs from the center and okie considers him a socialist! Laughing
georgeob1
 
  2  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2010 11:29 pm
@plainoldme,
Acxtually, by the standards of this country, the current administration is the most left wing government we have had since Jimmy Carter.
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2010 02:30 pm
A RECTIFICATION ACT
Quote:
Congressional Reform Act of 2010

1. Term Limits: 12 years only, one of the possible options below.

A. Two Six year Senate terms
B. Six Two year House terms
C. One Six year Senate term and three Two Year House terms

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

2. No Tenure / No Pension:

A congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security:

All funds in the Congressional retirement fund moves to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, Congress participates with the American people.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, server your term(s), then go home and back to work.

4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan just as all Americans.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

5. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

6. Congress looses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

7. Congress must equally abide in all laws they impose on the American people.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

8. All contracts with past and present congressmen are void effective 1/1/11.

The American people did not make this contract with congressmen, congressmen made all these contracts for themselves.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career.. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.


0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2010 02:40 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob, Whether being "most left wing government" is good or bad must be weighed against how some professors rank Obama. My ranking of Obama falls much lower, because I'm disappointed in many of the legislation he has initiated and approved that ended up with sloppy control of costs.

Quote:
Professors rank President Obama 15th best president


By EMILY SCHULTHEIS | 7/1/10 1:29 PM EDT

President Barack Obama's ranking is slightly higher than those of other presidents who have taken office since the poll started nearly 30 years ago.


A new poll of leading presidential scholars ranks Barack Obama as the 15th best president of the United States, just below Bill Clinton but ahead of Ronald Reagan.

The Siena College poll, which surveyed 238 presidential scholars at U.S. colleges and universities, asked scholars to rate the nation’s 43 chief executives on 20 attributes ranging from legislative accomplishments to integrity and imagination.

In the overall ranking, Obama rated two places below Clinton, who was 13th best, and three better than Reagan, who is ranked as the 18th best.

Franklin D. Roosevelt again earned the top spot, as he has every time since the poll was first conducted in 1982. He and the Mount Rushmore presidents — Teddy Roosevelt, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson — have consistently been the top five presidents in the poll’s findings.

Obama’s 15th ranking is slightly higher than other presidents who have taken office since the poll started nearly 30 years ago. Most start out at about number 20, said Siena statistics professor and poll director Douglas Lonnstrom.

“[Obama’s] doing a little better, but he’s generally in the same ballpark,” he said.

While he ranked high on traits like imagination (6th), communication ability (7th) and intelligence (8th), Obama rated poorly ratings on background (32nd), which was composed of traits like family, education and experience.

Lonnstrom said the main factor that gives a president a top-five or top-10 ranking is his accomplishments — and an all-around high ranking in most categories.

FDR, for example, ranks in the top 10 for every category except integrity, he said.

“The experts really are looking for consistency, a president who is looking good across most of these categories,” he said.

Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush, was ranked at number 23 in 2002 — the last time Siena’s presidential expert poll was conducted — but has since dropped to number 39, qualifying him as one of the five worst presidents. Bush came in at number 42 — second to last — on issues such as handling the U.S. economy, foreign policy accomplishments and intelligence. (Warren G. Harding was rated the least intelligent president).

Bush joins Harding, Andrew Johnson, James Buchanan and Franklin Pierce, all of whom have consistently ranked as the worst presidents since the poll started, in the bottom five.

Several other presidents also saw movement in their ratings this year. Bill Clinton moved up five places, from No. 18 in 2002 to No. 13 today; John F. Kennedy also moved up, from No. 14 to No. 11.

Carter, Reagan and Nixon all dropped in the rankings this year — Carter dropped seven spots, from No. 25 in 2002 to No. 32 now; Reagan dropped two spots, from No. 16 to No. 18; and Nixon fell four spots, from No. 26 to No. 30.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2010 07:09 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

okie, You have the habit of identifying only things that you see and leftist, but ignore all the rightist actions Hitler took. You are always blind to what conservatives do, but rattle off specific incidences as leftist sins.

Your myopia provides you with a one way lens that only you can see through, and it makes you look foolish and stupid.

Many people have tried to show you by providing evidence from reliable sources, and all you do is attack the author rather than the content of what is written. That's because you are unable to challenge what is written.

You are a child who doesn't know how to learn and respect other people's POV, because you believe you have all the answers. You are wrong on all accounts.
Okay, I challenge you to list the rightest actions that Hitler took, and I challenge you to knock off your childish insults and actually post something meaningful, such as actual evidence of your arguments. How about doing that, ci, instead of insulting and belittling anyone and everyone that disagrees with you and your liberal allies? How about it. See if you can do it, actually post a list of rightest actions that Hitler took?

I have already posted not only his leftist beliefs but some of his leftist actions, to which you have not responded or disputed. If you have any decency, I would like to see you actually post something factual and meaningful, along with the backup links.
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2010 07:13 pm
@georgeob1,
We are in perfect agreement.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2010 07:16 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:

Finally, there are 6 million proofs that Hitler was on the right.

Actually, I have in fact posted the obvious truth about that, which you would know if you have actually studied Hitler and what he believed in Mein Kampf, the Nazi 25 points, and all the rest. The reality of it was that Hitler believed the Jews represented a corruption of the society of Germany, because Jews brought in capitalism and the inherent root evil of capitalism was greed. A big reason why Hitler hated the Jews and set about to eliminate them was because the Jews represented all the evils of capitalism and the greed that went with it. The only logical conclusion here then is the fact that it was a leftist idealogy that caused those 6 million to die, because the underlying philosophy was Common Good over Individual good, even to the point that individual lives were expendable for the good of the whole, which was the Germany and the German utopia that Hitler envisioned.

The reason those 6 million Jews died was similar to the reasons millions have died under other leftist regimes, it is because the individual is expendable for the good of the State and supposedly common good for all. Individuals don't matter, pom, thats the whole point of leftist idealogies. I continue to be surprised that so many people simply cannot see the obvious here.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2010 07:22 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

Quote:
. The argument by the liberal lobby here has been that even if the Nazi 25 points were leftist or socialist, Hitler did not govern that way, that he governed as a right winger or conservative.


Oh, really? Can you link to those arguments? Because I think you have just created a straw man.

If you read the arguments that have been presented to you, you will see that the vast majority who disagree with you have specifically said that it's not right to label Hitler as either a Liberal or a Conservative, because in truth his goals had nothing to do with how the country was governed and everything to do with absolute power on his part. That's neither Liberal nor Conservative.

Cycloptichorn

What a copout. I am not going to go back and dig up what I think most people know already, that some here have used the argument that although Hitler and the Nazis had a platform that might have been leftist, it didn't matter because he ruled as a right wing extremist.

And your claim that he was neither Liberal or Conservative, that is the ultimate copout in my opinion. You cannot get away with that one. The evidence is clear and it is overwhelming. You claim it had to do with absolute power. Okay, was Stalin not a leftist either? After all, it was all about absolute power, is that right? Of course its about power, politics is about power, but politics is also about left vs right, and it is inescapable, cyclops, you cannot run away from the truth of it. Your arguments are getting worse by the day.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2010 07:28 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:

We are in perfect agreement.

pom, you have posted that Obama is a centrist. Which is it?

Hey George, I have you right where I want you in regard to the Hitler argument. If Obama is the most left wing president since Carter, surely you would not try to argue that Hitler was a right winger, and not way way to the left of Obama?
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2010 07:39 pm
@okie,
Finally, okie's IQ is less than that of a stalk of broccoli.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2010 07:45 pm
@okie,
okie, You're doing it again; you have failed to acknowledge the evidence provided by several posters, and you expect me to waste my time rehashing the same thing? Never happen.

Your brain is locked in a iron vise, and nobody can penetrate it.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  2  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2010 08:40 pm
@plainoldme,
cicerone imposter wrote:

okie, You're doing it again; you have failed to acknowledge the evidence provided by several posters, and you expect me to waste my time rehashing the same thing? Never happen.

plainoldme wrote:
I've told you that what is right today was not right a generation ago and what is left in America is not left in Germany.

Okay folks, at least a couple of issues here. If I have overlooked your evidence or anyone elses, my apologies. I honestly acknowledge everything I see here. Since I have not only a business to run but a family that is busy with all kinds of things, I cannot, nor do I wish to spend every waking hour on this forum. For example, I have not been here for a couple of days, but this evening I tried to review most of what had been posted, and although I think I caught most everything in regard to the debate about Hitler, I might have missed something.

Secondly, in regard to the above statement by pom, I think she may have nailed a big part of the problem here in the lack of connecting between us. I have in fact pointed out a number of times in different words what she just said, that what might have been considered right wing or left wing in Germany is different than now and in the United States in particular. To clarify, I have tried to point out numerous times that my assertion that Hitler was a leftist is in context with how we now understand left vs right in the world today, and in particular in America today. This seems to have fallen on deaf ears repeatedly, as various ones seem to return to their argument that Hitler was a right winger of the day in Germany, by virtue of various factors which seems often to go to that of his nationalism. Somehow, many historians apparently assign extreme nationalistic fervor as right wing in nature. To no avail, I have pointed out numerous exceptions to that, which I think proves the obvious, that nationalism can occur on both sides of the spectrum.

With all of that said, I would like to ask a few simple questions that might help me understand the thinking of some of you, such as pom, imposter, george, cyclops, Walter, anyone for that matter.

1. If you could define left vs right political idealogy in one sentence each, relative to today's world and in particular an American context or understanding, what would those sentences be?
2. If various aspects of communism or complete socialism could be combined with pure free market capitalism, what term would you use for that system, centrist, moderate, Democratic socialist, or what?
3. On the political spectrum, is Obama in philosophy a centrist, a moderate, a leftist, or a rightest conservative?
4. Does an all powerful State typically occur in a left wing or right wing government?
5. Are individual rights and responsibilities typical of left wing or right wing conservative governments?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 12/29/2025 at 11:00:10