@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:
Your post is interesting and informative, Walter, but it again illustrates that you can't use European definitions for 'conservative', 'liberal' etc. or their histories to define American Conservatism in 2008. Nor is the term 'Christian' useful in this context.
You asked me about that. And I know that 'liberals' in America follow a political line similar to our our conservatives while the conservatives would be far right to extreme right.
And most certainly I won't compare the various histories ... starting in 1690 in England (in Germany only around 1848/9, with the Social Democrats founded in 1863. [The first official "liberal" = 'libertarian' party in Germany was the Deutsche Fortschrittspartei (German Progress Party), founded in 1861.]
I'm not sure why Christian isn't useful in this context - many European conservative parties have the prefix 'Christian' :
Christlich-demokratische Volkspartei CH (Christian-Democratic People's Party Switzerland),
Krestanka a demokraticka unie CZ (Christian Democratic Union Czech.),
Christlich Soziale Union CSU (Christian Social Union, Bavaria/Germany) [the CDU isn't present in Bavaria],
Kristendemokraterne DK (Christian Democrats, Denmark),
Christian Democratic People’s Party HU (Hungary), UDC -
Unione dei Democratici Cristiani e dei Democratici di Centro IT (Italy),
Homeland Union - Lithuanian Christian Democrats LT (Lithuania),
Chrëschtlech Sozial Vollekspartei LU (Christian Social People's Party Luxembourg), Christian Democratic People's Party Moldova, ... ... ..., and even the
Partito Democratico Cristiano Sammarinese SM (Christian Democratic Party of San Marino, San Marino).
Certainly we have here left and ring wings within all those parties as well - but generally, they are right of the center and even more to the right.