chaiyah wrote:NASA manipulates their data, Monger, to make it comply with their preconceived notions.
Oh fer crying out loud, Chai! SOHO data is not so easy to manipulate that you can just mention such a notion in passing and expect to be taken seriously. SOHO is a cooperative effort between both NASA and the European Space Agency. It's run in the framework of both of the Solar Terrestrial Science Program and the International Solar-Terrestrial Physics Program. Japan is also behind its research. The SOHO spacecraft was built in Europe by large engineering teams and more than 200 investigators from many institutions supported development and preparation for its operations and data analysis. Many thousands of professional & amateur astronomers around the world are highly motivated to constantly study & validate its data. A conspiracy of the magnitude you suggest is preposterous & beyond all logic!
But if your belief is strong enough to negate all that in your mind (this obviously wasn't the case when you were posting SOHO's photos to support your theory), do us all a favor & go buy yourself a friggin' backyard telescope & verify it for yourself!
On the other hand, there have been a number of well-documented cases of conspiracy nuts flagrantly manipulating SOHO data to support their lunacy. See
How to make your own UFO for one example.
You say you want everyone to "look up at the sky" and then hang all your arguments on photos. If you'd bother to honestly take your own advice, you'd see, in an instant, that the photos are just bad pics. (But no wait, the aliens control who sees the Rouge Sun/Comet/Planet X where and when, right?)
You get huffy when people point out the fallacies in your "reasoning". You even admit you're no expert, yet at the same time won't accept the word of any expert. You can't have it both ways, that expertise is something of value (or at least to take note of) and then simply dismiss it out of hand. Reasoning with you is essentially the same as talking to a wall.
One more thing, using your own website to make your case is poor arguing at best. You're the one making the outlandish claims. It's up to you to back them up with independent observations and analysis from reputable sources.
I truly sympathize if this is impossible because every government and astronomer in the world is against you.