flaja wrote:Then there is no reason to talk to you, period. Your failure to comprehend commonly accepted definitions will mean that you can twist anything that anyone else says to suit your own conclusions.
I think you better look in a mirror when you say that.
The Rad, the Berquerel, the Rem, the Curie and the Gray are all standard units of radiation and radiation exposure that have definitions that are based either partially or totally on the concept that the radioactive decay of particular isotopes is and always has been constant. If you choose to disregard those definitions then take it up with the ASTM, the IEER, OSHA, EPA, USDA, AMA, or any other of the myriad standardizing agencies. As for me, definitions are definitions, dimensions are dimensions, and units are units and at this time the world doesn't carve them in Jello.
BTW radioactive decay is a nuclear and not an electronic event, consequently until you achieve temperatures (several millions of degrees Kelvin) and pressures (several trillion Pascals) where the electronic field of the atom collapses and protons and electrons collapse into neutronium, isotropic decay will not be affected by pressure and temperature.
In other words my universe is a wondrous place, but it is not fickle.
Rap