1
   

The hottest period in history

 
 
raprap
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2008 04:21 pm
flaja wrote:
And they are all based on the same assumptions while the last thing any scientist should do is assume anything.


OK then it's acceptable to not accept any measurement, a foot becomes an acre, red becomes a gallon, a second becomes a meter---

Get a grip fella---you've got a reality problem. The Big Kahuna gave us a mind to use---and so far you've wasted yours.----.

Rap
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2008 06:04 pm
All the methods of radioisotope detn are based upon the same kinetics yes. Do you know of any others? Youve stated that you werent sure about this, please dont demonstrate that fact continuously. Have you read any of the links? If not, why not open your Bible and study that.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2008 08:59 pm
raprap wrote:
flaja wrote:
And they are all based on the same assumptions while the last thing any scientist should do is assume anything.


OK then it's acceptable to not accept any measurement, a foot becomes an acre, red becomes a gallon, a second becomes a meter---


You are talking about things that we accept because of the definitions we have agreed to apply to them. We are not making assumptions about these things.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2008 09:01 pm
farmerman wrote:
All the methods of radioisotope detn are based upon the same kinetics yes.


I haven't said one word about kinetics.
0 Replies
 
raprap
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2008 09:07 pm
Definition definitons definitions, and your's are carved in Jello.

Rap
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Feb, 2008 10:34 am
raprap wrote:
Definition definitons definitions, and your's are carved in Jello.

Rap


Then there is no reason to talk to you, period. Your failure to comprehend commonly accepted definitions will mean that you can twist anything that anyone else says to suit your own conclusions.
0 Replies
 
raprap
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Feb, 2008 11:17 am
flaja wrote:
Then there is no reason to talk to you, period. Your failure to comprehend commonly accepted definitions will mean that you can twist anything that anyone else says to suit your own conclusions.


I think you better look in a mirror when you say that.

The Rad, the Berquerel, the Rem, the Curie and the Gray are all standard units of radiation and radiation exposure that have definitions that are based either partially or totally on the concept that the radioactive decay of particular isotopes is and always has been constant. If you choose to disregard those definitions then take it up with the ASTM, the IEER, OSHA, EPA, USDA, AMA, or any other of the myriad standardizing agencies. As for me, definitions are definitions, dimensions are dimensions, and units are units and at this time the world doesn't carve them in Jello.

BTW radioactive decay is a nuclear and not an electronic event, consequently until you achieve temperatures (several millions of degrees Kelvin) and pressures (several trillion Pascals) where the electronic field of the atom collapses and protons and electrons collapse into neutronium, isotropic decay will not be affected by pressure and temperature.

In other words my universe is a wondrous place, but it is not fickle.

Rap
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/01/2025 at 02:25:10