1
   

God, how I hate McCain

 
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 11:04 am
woiyo wrote:
flaja wrote:
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
And are you suggesting that someone who is "just" an Annapolis graduate, ex-Marine Officer, and Vietnam Vet could not be trusted to write a truthful and objective book about McCain?
Quote:


I'm saying that a Marine officer, Annapolis graduate or Vietnam Vet wouldn't want to become a reporter.

Quote:
Your time may be better served by reading the biography rather than picking apart campaign ads to find dubious contradictions.


The part about McCain's philandering is enough to sour me on him permanently. The ad doesn't surprise me since McCain's entire character is suspect.


You're a fairly shallow thinking. Do issues play a part in your decision process?


If I cannot trust a man because of his character, I cannot trust him to do something or not do something pertaining to an issue.

A double minded man is unstable in all his ways- Epistle of James 1:8.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 11:17 am
flaja wrote:
woiyo wrote:
flaja wrote:
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
And are you suggesting that someone who is "just" an Annapolis graduate, ex-Marine Officer, and Vietnam Vet could not be trusted to write a truthful and objective book about McCain?
Quote:


I'm saying that a Marine officer, Annapolis graduate or Vietnam Vet wouldn't want to become a reporter.

Quote:
Your time may be better served by reading the biography rather than picking apart campaign ads to find dubious contradictions.


The part about McCain's philandering is enough to sour me on him permanently. The ad doesn't surprise me since McCain's entire character is suspect.


You're a fairly shallow thinking. Do issues play a part in your decision process?


If I cannot trust a man because of his character, I cannot trust him to do something or not do something pertaining to an issue.

A double minded man is unstable in all his ways- Epistle of James 1:8.


How might you characterize Clintons "character"?
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 12:19 pm
flaja wrote:
woiyo wrote:
flaja wrote:
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
And are you suggesting that someone who is "just" an Annapolis graduate, ex-Marine Officer, and Vietnam Vet could not be trusted to write a truthful and objective book about McCain?
Quote:


I'm saying that a Marine officer, Annapolis graduate or Vietnam Vet wouldn't want to become a reporter.

Quote:
Your time may be better served by reading the biography rather than picking apart campaign ads to find dubious contradictions.


The part about McCain's philandering is enough to sour me on him permanently. The ad doesn't surprise me since McCain's entire character is suspect.


You're a fairly shallow thinking. Do issues play a part in your decision process? - just for clarity sake, this is not part of my post - Finn


If I cannot trust a man because of his character, I cannot trust him to do something or not do something pertaining to an issue.

A double minded man is unstable in all his ways- Epistle of James 1:8.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 12:25 pm
flaja wrote:
Finn wrote:
And are you suggesting that someone who is "just" an Annapolis graduate, ex-Marine Officer, and Vietnam Vet could not be trusted to write a truthful and objective book about McCain?


I'm saying that a Marine officer, Annapolis graduate or Vietnam Vet wouldn't want to become a reporter.

Well this one did so what the hell is your point? He's not a true Marine officer, Annapolis grad or Vietnam vet?

Quote:
Your time may be better served by reading the biography rather than picking apart campaign ads to find dubious contradictions.


The part about McCain's philandering is enough to sour me on him permanently. The ad doesn't surprise me since McCain's entire character is suspect.

OK - now where getting somewhere. You have no respect for a man who cheats and will not vote for him. Fine. I think such a position unduly narrow your choice of candidates, but I respect your conviction. You need only say that though and not attempt to manufacture evidence that his perfidy extends beyond his first marriage.

0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 02:32 pm
woiyo wrote:
flaja wrote:
woiyo wrote:
flaja wrote:
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
And are you suggesting that someone who is "just" an Annapolis graduate, ex-Marine Officer, and Vietnam Vet could not be trusted to write a truthful and objective book about McCain?
Quote:


I'm saying that a Marine officer, Annapolis graduate or Vietnam Vet wouldn't want to become a reporter.

Quote:
Your time may be better served by reading the biography rather than picking apart campaign ads to find dubious contradictions.


The part about McCain's philandering is enough to sour me on him permanently. The ad doesn't surprise me since McCain's entire character is suspect.


You're a fairly shallow thinking. Do issues play a part in your decision process?


If I cannot trust a man because of his character, I cannot trust him to do something or not do something pertaining to an issue.

A double minded man is unstable in all his ways- Epistle of James 1:8.


How might you characterize Clintons "character"?


At least as bad as Clinton's. Obama may be a man of good character, but I couldn't take his liberalism.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 02:35 pm
Too liberal for you? OK...Fair enough.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 02:40 pm
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Well this one did so what the hell is your point? He's not a true Marine officer, Annapolis grad or Vietnam vet?


Likely akin to a Kerry or a Gore. I prefer to think of Vietnam Vets as people like my late uncle who was in Nam in the Air Cav and was wounded at least twice (with life-threatening consequences) and who managed to win a Bronze Star and a Silver Star as a sniper and who then spent 30 years as a civilian firefighter. People like McCain are opportunists who rely on their war record to gain political influence that they couldn't have otherwise.

Quote:
OK - now where getting somewhere. You have no respect for a man who cheats and will not vote for him. Fine. I think such a position unduly narrow your choice of candidates, but I respect your conviction. You need only say that though and not attempt to manufacture evidence that his perfidy extends beyond his first marriage.


A man's philandering doesn't permeate his entire character? Why should we expect a man who cheats on his wife to be honest and upright in any other aspect of his life?
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 02:51 pm
Ok...so I am finished trying to answer your question of how he could be inspired by Reagan so early on. Nothing I can say will sway your belief and nothing you can say will sway mine....I now realize that I am debating the issue with someone that doesn't care about the outcome, but is in it for the debate only.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 05:07 pm
flaja wrote:
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Well this one did so what the hell is your point? He's not a true Marine officer, Annapolis grad or Vietnam vet?


Likely akin to a Kerry or a Gore. I prefer to think of Vietnam Vets as people like my late uncle who was in Nam in the Air Cav and was wounded at least twice (with life-threatening consequences) and who managed to win a Bronze Star and a Silver Star as a sniper and who then spent 30 years as a civilian firefighter. People like McCain are opportunists who rely on their war record to gain political influence that they couldn't have otherwise.

Were you in Vietnam, the Service, combat?

Quote:
OK - now where getting somewhere. You have no respect for a man who cheats and will not vote for him. Fine. I think such a position unduly narrow your choice of candidates, but I respect your conviction. You need only say that though and not attempt to manufacture evidence that his perfidy extends beyond his first marriage.


A man's philandering doesn't permeate his entire character? Why should we expect a man who cheats on his wife to be honest and upright in any other aspect of his life?

Again, you need not attempt to manufacture evidence that his perfidy extends beyond his first marriage.

0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 06:04 pm
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Were you in Vietnam, the Service, combat?


I am saying that liberals like Kerry and Gore (and likely this reporter) only went to Nam because of what they thought service there could do for their later careers.

Quote:
Again, you need not attempt to manufacture evidence that his perfidy extends beyond his first marriage.


I'm not because such manufacture is not needed. I take it as a given that a philanderer is scum in all aspects of his life simply because he is a philanderer.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 08:10 pm
flaja wrote:
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Were you in Vietnam, the Service, combat?


I am saying that liberals like Kerry and Gore (and likely this reporter) only went to Nam because of what they thought service there could do for their later careers.

Quote:
Again, you need not attempt to manufacture evidence that his perfidy extends beyond his first marriage.


I'm not because such manufacture is not needed. I take it as a given that a philanderer is scum in all aspects of his life simply because he is a philanderer.


You're a pip flaja.

I think I just better bid you adieu.
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Feb, 2008 09:16 pm
Yeah, I'm sure that he had it all planned out. Went through all of this just to get to Vietnam because he knew it would benefit his career....

Quote:
Education: U.S. Naval Academy, graduated 1964, M.A., journalism, Stanford University, 1970.

Career: Officer, U.S. Marine Corps, June 1964-September 1968. Served in Vietnam 12-and-a-half months. Medically retired from Marine Corps. Reporter, Annapolis Capital, 1970, and Baltimore's The Sun, 1973-present (White House correspondent, 1983-88; currently deputy Washington bureau chief).


Source scroll down to bio.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Feb, 2008 08:40 pm
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Feb, 2008 03:53 pm
Let me get some clarification .
This guy is too old
and he represents a party which is unpopular around the globe..
Among the alternative 2 none is dare enough to regret /repent.

CHANGE
is direly needed.
System is rotten to the core.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Feb, 2008 05:43 pm
Ramafuchs wrote:
Let me get some clarification .
This guy is too old
and he represents a party which is unpopular around the globe..
Among the alternative 2 none is dare enough to regret /repent.

CHANGE
is direly needed.
System is rotten to the core.


If the system is rotten to the core, how is someone (McCain, Obama, Clinton) who is part of and dependent on that system going to change it?
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Feb, 2008 06:17 pm
flaja wrote:

If the system is rotten to the core, how is someone (McCain, Obama, Clinton) who is part of and dependent on that system going to change it?

And there in itself lies the problem. I knew we would agree on something eventually.
So given the lack of choices, do we:
A) vote for the guy with the most experience?
B) vote for the woman who is in reality part of the long standing status quo?
C) Vote for the new guy who has been in the system the shortest, hoping that he hasn't been too entrenched in the status quo?
D) Hope for the miracle that McCain doesn't reach the magic delegate number, and we are faced with a brokered convention on the Rep. side?
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Feb, 2008 06:26 pm
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Feb, 2008 09:10 pm
tommrr wrote:
A) vote for the guy with the most experience?


Most experience at what? Log rolling? Backroom deals? Pork?

Quote:
C) Vote for the new guy who has been in the system the shortest, hoping that he hasn't been too entrenched in the status quo?


This would only work as a 3rd party movement that includes an effort to elect members to Congress so the executive and legislature would be equally inexperienced. Otherwise the wolves in the Congress would eat the inexperienced president alive.

Quote:
D) Hope for the miracle that McCain doesn't reach the magic delegate number, and we are faced with a brokered convention on the Rep. side?


Even without being a member of the Republican Party, this is what I hope for. There is only a slight chance that things would get worse under a Democrat (since the Republicans can filibuster the Senate and likely take over Congress in 2010 as they did in 2004). But there is practically no chance that anything would get better under McCain even if by some miracle the Republicans were to re-take Congress (just look at how bad GW and his Republican-controlled Congress did, but then if McCain decides to tow the conservative line and ends up in the White House there would be no McCain in the Senate to obstruct him as he did GW).
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Feb, 2008 09:14 pm
blueflame1 wrote:


If waterboarding means what I think it means, I am opposed to it. Any interrogation technique that inflicts physical or psychological pain on someone or makes them think that their physical safety is in danger, is immoral. I don't see how waterboarding can be a conservative position; it certainly isn't the position of this conservative.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Feb, 2008 10:08 pm
Good on you. Seriously. <nods>
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/12/2025 at 11:27:40