1
   

My little politics blog

 
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 09:28 am
Here we go:

Quote:
Superdelegates in the Democratic Party are typically members of the Democratic National Committee, elected officials like senators or governors, or party leaders. They do not have to indicate a candidate preference and do not have to compete for their position. If a superdelegate dies or is unable to participate at the convention, alternates do not replace that delegate, which would reduce the total delegates number and the "magic number" needed to clinch the nomination.


http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D

So, JPB's broken some news -- Hillary's down another superdelegate.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 12:06 pm
Quote:
Poll: N. Carolina voters trust Obama more than Clinton
By Jim Morrill | Charlotte Observer
Posted on Saturday, April 5, 2008 email | print tool nameclose
tool goes here
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama leads rival Hillary Clinton among North Carolina voters in part because voters say they value trustworthiness over experience.

But North Carolina voters gave Arizona Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, higher marks than either Democrat on both counts, as well as on his credentials to keep the country safe, according to a new poll sponsored by the Charlotte Observer and WCNC television..

"(It's) his whole background," said Democrat Robert Brown, 46, an online trader from Chapel Hill. "He was a prisoner of war. He's an upfront, straight-talking man."

The poll found that trust is the top consideration for most voters. Nearly nine in 10 said it would play a big role in determining their vote.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/32787.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 12:22 pm
Let's see if this works...
john stewart
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 12:23 pm
apparently not...

wonderful stewart bit here... scroll down to near bottom

http://www.crooksandliars.com/
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 12:54 pm
(Would you mind summarizing?)
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 12:57 pm
Summarizing a Stewart video? I don't think I ought to try.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 12:58 pm
Oh, i see, it's fallen out the bottom...hang on
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 12:59 pm
No I meant more that I assume it's not captioned -- if it is, great! (These things never are...)
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 01:00 pm
Go here... http://www.thedailyshow.com/

Under 'coming up next', it's the fourth video "obama watch'
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 01:01 pm
oh golly...I'm sorry...I keep forgetting

um...
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 01:12 pm
three particularly funny bits:

First, he mentions the Fox And Friends greenroom and uses the club scene visual from Clockwork Orange

Second, that serves as to introduce the next bit which is Chris Wallace on Fox and Friends where Wallace says Obama promised to come on the show but hasn't yet and Stewart points out that the graphic (of the digital clock) is the same as that used on "24"...the TV show which is about terrorists trying to assassinate a black president

third, with Matthews, and after a series of truly silly questions, Matthews asks if anything really bizarre has happened on the campaign which just caused obama to chuckle at night lying in bed and Obama answers, "yes, that happens every day, but then I stopped watching cable news"
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Apr, 2008 01:15 pm
Thanks!

I saw that last one live -- having a quick wit isn't a major qualification for presidency but it's a nice perk.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Apr, 2008 06:20 pm
Penn's out!

Maybe it's been discussed, I just found out and I'm surprised.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Apr, 2008 07:37 pm
" . . .Penn's resignation came under pressure from an angry Sen. Clinton, who believed that Penn had recused himself from any clients who might pose a conflict for her campaign.

Clinton spoke about her opposition to the Colombia trade deal last week in her speech to the AFL-CIO in Philadelphia, and on Saturday seven labor unions that are part of the "Change to Win" coalition called for Clinton to fire Penn. . . ."

http://2008central.net/2008/04/06/clinton-press-release-statement-from-campaign-manager-on-resignation-of-mark-penn/

Quote:
Clinton Press Release: Statement From Campaign Manager On Resignation Of Mark Penn
April 6, 2008
[Clinton Campaign Press Release from April 6, 2008]


Statement from Maggie Williams

After the events of the last few days, Mark Penn has asked to give up his role as Chief Strategist of the Clinton Campaign; Mark, and Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates, Inc. will continue to provide polling and advice to the campaign.

Geoff Garin and Howard Wolfson will coordinate the campaign's strategic message team going forward.




Penn no longer has the title "Chief Strategist". But Penn and his company "will continue to provide polling and advice."

Apparently, still on payroll. Still getting millions. No mention of his meeting with the Colombian president or whether Hillary knew and approved of it in advance. No mention of why, after meeting with Penn, the Colombian president began attacking OBAMA.

Hillary did NOT fire him. She did NOT get his resignation. He just has given one job title over to Wolfson. Other than that, he's still working for her--still planning strategy, still making recommendations based on his polls.

Nothing has changed. It is just more smoke and mirrors from the Clinton campaign.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 05:09 pm
Transcript (and videos) of Obama's questions for Petraeus and Crocker today:

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/obama_we_have_to_apply_measure.php
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Apr, 2008 06:52 am
I read the thing about Bill Clinton's ties to Colombia and the trade deal yesterday in Huffington Post -- didn't recognize the author and couldn't quite tell how big of a deal it actually is.

The Chicago Tribune's Swamp has this follow-up:

Quote:
By John Riley

Following the excellent links in this Huffington Post story on Bill Clinton's ties to Colombia and lucrative trade-related speaking fees, we find:

In May, 2007, Colombia -- looking to overcome Democrats' resistance to a free trade deal -- hires Mark Penn's firm, Burson Marsteller, for $300,000. Penn is Hillary's chief strategist at the time, and the hiring is publicized.

In May, 2007, Colombia -- pursuing the same goals -- puts the Glover Park Group, partly owned by Hillary spokesman Howard Wolfson, on a $30,000 a month retainer. Wolfson is already working for Hillary, and that deal is also publicized.

In May 2007, Colombia announces plans for a gala in June to honor former President Bill Clinton, with President Alvaro Uribe (left) to honor Clinton with a "Colombia is Passion" award in return for his support. While Al Gore backed out of an April, 2007, event with Uribe because of his opposition to Colombia's human and labor rights practices, Clinton attends the June gala, and says in his speech, "We need to remember that we are friends."

Hillary did not attend the gala, and came out in opposition to the Colombia free-trade agreement in November. So, she can reasonably argue that Colombia's efforts to work Clinton connections didn't influence her -- "Senator Clinton is the candidate for president and she is a clear and firm opponent of the Colombian free trade agreement," her campaign said today -- but she can hardly argue that she was unaware of them.

So why did she act shocked last week when the Wall Street Journal said Penn met with Colombia on the trade deal? What was going on that she didn't already know was going on?

We're still skeptical about the significance of this story to ordinary voters. But if Penn's demotion was supposed to suggest to her blue-collar labor base that she was shocked and surprised that a top aide was working for Colombia, it just won't wash. The ties of Colombia and Clinton Inc. seem to have been pretty open and obvious.

It was hardly a secret.


Huffington Post story:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/08/bill-clintons-ties-to-col_n_95651.html
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Apr, 2008 07:43 am
"Clinton leadership a study in missteps"

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0408/9478.html

Beginning:

Quote:
Hillary Rodham Clinton wants voters to decide the nomination based on who can coolly and competently run the country. She had better hope they don't study her recent campaign too closely for the answer.

Clinton has overseen two major staff shake-ups in two months. She has left a trail of unpaid bills and unhappy vendors and had to loan her own campaign $5 million to keep it afloat in January. Her campaign badly underestimated her main adversary, Barack Obama, miscalculated the importance of organizing caucus states and was caught flat-footed after failing to lock up the nomination on Super Tuesday.



(Emphasis mine -- I agree with both parts of that point.)
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Apr, 2008 07:48 am
Oooh, this still bothers me, though:

Quote:
There is no question he has stumbled in ways that will haunt him in the general election. His handling of the Tony Rezko affair was exceptionally clumsy. It's still puzzling why he was so cozy with a known influence-peddler and why it took so long to make all of the details clear and public.


As FreeDuck and I discussed earlier, he DID make the details clear and public very early on. One additional detail was released only when the private citizens involved -- the people he bought the house from -- were comfortable with it. (They confirmed that the two transactions were separate -- Obama buying the house, Rezko buying the empty lot next door -- and that the former was in no way dependent on the latter.) (Obama had said as much earlier but didn't push the homeowners to confirm, as they were uncomfortable with getting involved.) Everything else was out there.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Apr, 2008 09:14 am
Quote:
more here http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/senate_post.php
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Apr, 2008 09:34 pm
Spiritual support if nothing else...
Quote:
CP Poll Finds Canadians Prefer Obama

By E&P Staff

Published: April 09, 2008 10:50 AM ET

CHICAGO A plurality of Canadian hope Barack Obama becomes the next U.S. president, while overwhelmingly rejecting John McCain, a poll by The Canadian Press and Harris/Decima finds.

The CP poll, released Wednesday, found 39% of surveyed Canadians prefer Obama, followed by 30% who hope Hillary Clinton becomes the next president. John McCain trails badly, preferred by 8%.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003787316
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 06:42:26