0
   

Hillary Plays the Emotion Card

 
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jan, 2008 03:59 pm
Brazile said that she's heard there will be a shake-up in the Clinton campaign, no matter what happens tonight. Presumably Mark Penn out, I dunno. They talked about how there were rumors that Begala and Carville would be brought in, but B and C denied it. Dunno.

No "when"ing yet, please! Superstitious person over here! :-)
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jan, 2008 04:08 pm
I am hoping, not predicting a double digit win for Obama, but I keep seeing the number 13...wouldn't that be great?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jan, 2008 04:09 pm
sozobe wrote:
Brazile said that she's heard there will be a shake-up in the Clinton campaign, no matter what happens tonight. Presumably Mark Penn out, I dunno. They talked about how there were rumors that Begala and Carville would be brought in, but B and C denied it. Dunno.

No "when"ing yet, please! Superstitious person over here! :-)


MSNBC says Begala and Carville will not be joining the team. Maybe they need to dump Terry McCauliffe!

There is still an excrutiating 2:49 before the polls close.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jan, 2008 04:21 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:

There is still an excrutiating 2:49 before the polls close.


Gruesome isn't it? Smile

I am so pleased to see the high voter turn-out, that's something I always
questioned about the United States, why the overall voting quota was
so low. So, I am happy to see people going to the polls, regardless whom
they vote for.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jan, 2008 04:25 pm
Cal wrote-

Quote:
Even the press thinks it's
in very poor taste!


That's a bit rich. Fancy the press thinking something's in very poor taste. Have they lost their nerve?

I should think they are merely stirring.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jan, 2008 04:25 pm
Let the show continues without content.
Final stage a person will be there with very few enthusiastics fans.(voters)
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jan, 2008 05:46 pm
It looks like a form of hysteria to me.

I think it's based on a sense of self-importance.

I don't labour under such a burden as can be seen from my member profile which was the first post I ever did on the internet.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 05:11 am
So much for opinion polls and exit polls eh.

We were being told all day yesterday that Mr Obama had a 13 point lead over Mrs Clinton and that he had won from the exit polls.

Then we woke up and it was all a load of bull. A 17% turn around whilst I was a snoozing. Goodness gracious me!

It's mass hysteria goodstyle.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 11:37 am
I have tried to refrain all day but I just can't help myself. I guess Bill's bashing and Hillary's tears didn't turn out so bad after all. For some reason I love to see them pull out from under and land on top. (Not saying it will last but...)
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 11:42 am
I'm convinced it's Diebold/voter fraud.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 12:03 pm
spendius wrote:
So much for opinion polls and exit polls eh.

We were being told all day yesterday that Mr Obama had a 13 point lead over Mrs Clinton and that he had won from the exit polls.

Then we woke up and it was all a load of bull. A 17% turn around whilst I was a snoozing. Goodness gracious me!

It's mass hysteria goodstyle.


Excerpt:

New Hampshire's Polling Fiasco

January 09, 2008 12:05 AM

There will be a serious, critical look at the final pre-election polls in the Democratic presidential primary in New Hampshire; that is essential. It is simply unprecedented for so many polls to have been so wrong. We need to know why.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenumbers/2008/01/new-hampshires.html
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 12:04 pm
why? so the fixed primary innuendo can get traction? Laughing
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 12:10 pm
Brand X wrote:
New Hampshire's Polling Fiasco

January 09, 2008 12:05 AM

There will be a serious, critical look at the final pre-election polls in the Democratic presidential primary in New Hampshire; that is essential. It is simply unprecedented for so many polls to have been so wrong. We need to know why.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenumbers/2008/01/new-hampshires.html

Yes, lots of investigations, gnashing of teeth, self flagellation, and then we are off to do it again. Didn't we do this last Presidential cycle?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/18/2025 at 09:03:11