Yeah, I've been trying to figure out where to react to that one. (The Steinem Op-Ed.) The first half was pissing me off. The second half/ ending left me confused about what she was getting at.
Oh, when I look it up online I see that I was wrong about where it ended in the paper version. I thought it ended here:
Quote:I'm not advocating a competition for who has it toughest. The caste systems of sex and race are interdependent and can only be uprooted together. That's why Senators Clinton and Obama have to be careful not to let a healthy debate turn into the kind of hostility that the news media love. Both will need a coalition of outsiders to win a general election. The abolition and suffrage movements progressed when united and were damaged by division; we should remember that.
But it doesn't.
Hmm, as I finish the whole thing I'm less annoyed, but I still find a lot to argue with. For example:
Quote:What worries me is that reporters ignore Mr. Obama's dependence on the old ?- for instance, the frequent campaign comparisons to John F. Kennedy, though Senator Edward Kennedy is supporting Senator Clinton ?- while not challenging the slander that her progressive policies are part of the Washington status quo.
What worries me is that some women, perhaps especially younger ones, hope to deny or escape the sexual caste system; thus Iowa women over 50 and 60, who disproportionately supported Senator Clinton, proved once again that women are the one group that grows more radical with age.
"Progressive"? "Radical"? I'm not sure. I think Edwards has a point with the status quo thing, as Cycloptichorn showed with the money-from-lobbyists graphic for example. And I don't think that the women over 50 or 60 who disproportionately supported Clinton are necessarily more radical. It's again the competition thing that she says she decries. Isn't it pretty radical to support Obama, too? In fact, with the Iraq vote, with the Iran Revolutionary Guard vote, with Obama's more vigorous opposition to DOMA, etc., it could be pretty easily argued that he's more progressive and more radical than she is.