1
   

Mike Huckabee

 
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 03:52 pm
stevewonder wrote:
he talks to God on his mobile!!!!!!!!!
need we say more???


Paul is electable. He certainly passes the nutitude test.

I thought he was God; or is that Limbaugh?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 03:59 pm
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Jan, 2008 11:09 am
Quote:
Huck, the Constitution and 'God's standards'
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy
WARREN, Mich. -- Huckabee's closing argument to voters here this evening featured a few new stories and two prolonged sections on illegal immigration and Christian values.

These two topics usually feature prominently in Huckabee's stump speech, but last night he got specific, promising to build a border fence within 18 months if elected and elaborating on his belief that the constitution needs to be amended.

"[Some of my opponents] do not want to change the Constitution, but I believe it's a lot easier to change the constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God, and that's what we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it's in God's standards rather than try to change God's standards," Huckabee said, referring to the need for a constitutional human life amendment and an amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

Huckabee often refers to the need to amend the constitution on these grounds, but he has never so specifically called for the Constitution to be brought within "God's standards," which are themselves debated amongst religious scholars. As a closing statement he asked the room of nearly 500 supporters to "pray and then work hard, and in that order," to help him secure a victory in Tuesday's GOP primary.

Tomorrow Huckabee will visit two polling places in the morning before taking off for South Carolina where he will watch Michigan's returns come in.


http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/15/579265.aspx
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Jan, 2008 02:37 pm
Advocate wrote:


Of course, if your a dem and your solution to everything is a tax hike, life can get boring also.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,298271,00.html

Quote:


snip


Quote:



So thats the dems idea, raise taxes on gas, even though taxes already are a major contributor to the price of gas.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Jan, 2008 03:38 pm
mysteryman wrote:
So thats the dems idea, raise taxes on gas, even though taxes already are a major contributor to the price of gas.


Huckabee, Giuliani and Romney have all come out in favour of an 'Apollo program for energy independence'. Without saying how they would finance that.

That better?
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jan, 2008 01:44 pm
Huckabee Directly Equates Homosexuality With Bestiality
By Greg Sargent - January 17, 2008, 12:00PM
At some point you'd think Mike Huckabee's views would be seen as so controversial that there's no way he could possibly be a contender for the nomination of one of America's two main political parties.

Especially now. In an interview with Beliefnet.com, a religion Web site, Huck has just clarified his view that the Constitution should be amended to be brought in line with God's will -- and he directly equated homosexuality with bestiality.

Huck, in elaborating on his views that the Constitution should be subjected to Biblical standards, had just wrapped up a discussion of the fact that marriage has meant "a man and a woman in a relationship for life." With this context firmly established, this exchange followed:

QUESTIONER: Is it your goal to bring the Constitution into strict conformity with the Bible? Some people would consider that a kind of dangerous undertaking, particularly given the variety of biblical interpretations.
HUCKABEE: Well, I don't think that's a radical view to say we're going to affirm marriage. I think the radical view is to say that we're going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal. Again, once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again. I think the radical position is to make a change in what's been historic.


That's pretty clear cut. Changing the definition of marriage so it can mean "two men" or "two women" is equivalent to changing it to mean "a man and an animal." No ambiguity here whatsoever.

Late Update: John Aravosis makes a key point about this latest Huckism:

This guy thinks it's fair game to talk about Romney's Mormonism? Fine, then let's have the media start talking about Huckabee's fringe views on Christianity.
Really, there's been surprisingly little discussion of this.

Separately, it's worth pointing out that Huck's quote above doesn't even use the tried-and-true "slippery slope" argument to couch his view that homosexuality is akin to bestiality. It's a direct equivalence.
link
0 Replies
 
Gala
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jan, 2008 02:51 pm
This is an aside, although relevant to the legalizing gay marriage debate-- someone pointed out to me, in disgust and questioning why gay people were trying to become mainstream by allowing themselves something as conventional as marriage. I agree with him. But from a legal standpoint, there are benefits.

Gay marriage ought to be recognized for legal purposes-- estates, hospital visits, etc.

Mike Huckabee sits in judgement because of the "act of homosexuality", which is so, like, evangelical.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jan, 2008 04:02 pm
As a distant observer of your election I expect the republicans select Ron Paul to usharp the seat of our beloved BUSH.
The Rest you can throw into the dustbin or put it in bush
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jan, 2008 11:53 pm
I could vote for a Democrat over Huckabee --- if a Democrat other than the current crop was running.

He a religious fundamentalist
He's a populist
He uses a High School popularity contest as a metaphor for America's place in the world
He apologized to the people of Pakistan for Bhutto's assasination

That's enough. He lost me after the first two and after just four I realize I can't imagine ever voting for him.

Wouldn't America just be peachy keen with Huck at the helm?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jan, 2008 04:49 pm
Quote:
In South Carolina, Pro-Confederate Flag Group Airs Ads Praising Huckabee's Flag Stance -- And Hitting McCain

January 17, 2008

A pro-Confederate Flag third-party group is running new radio ads in South Carolina praising Mike Huckabee's pro-state's-rights stance on the flag issue -- and slamming John McCain over his repeated criticism of the controversial symbol.

"Mike Huckabee's stand is a breath of fresh air," say the ads, which are paid for by the Americans for the Preservation of American Culture. "Gov. Huckabee understands that all the average guy with a Confederate Flag on his pickup truck is saying is: He's proud to be a Southerner."

McCain has been dogged by the flag issue in South Carolina since his 2000 Presidential run; he's repeatedly denounced it, calling it a "racist symbol."

There are two versions of the ad, one attacking McCain, the other attacking Romney, who's also condemned the flag. [..]

Huckabee has not distanced himself from the ads. Huckabee's position on the issue is that the Federal government should stay out of states' disputes over the flag.

Ron Wilson, an official with the group airing the ads, declined to say how big the buy was. But he confirmed that it was running on all South Carolina radio stations that carry Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Bill O'Reilly.

LISTEN TO BOTH ADS (the second starts roughly at the one-minute mark)


Here's the "Photo of the Day" from TNR's The Stump from yesterday:

http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_stump/SC.jpg

(Protester outside a John McCain event in Columbia, S.C.)
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jan, 2008 04:57 pm
Meanwhile, a group called Common Sense Issues has, according to the New York Times..

    [b]begun making what it said were a million calls to households in South Carolina telling voters, according to one of the calls, that [John] McCain has "voted to use unborn babies in medical research."[/b]
Lovely.

Pollster.com has more:

Quote:
"We hope to call 546,000 households in Nevada on behalf of Huckabee," said Patrick Davis, the executive director of Common Sense Issues, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Want to hear one of the calls? Here, via Ambinder, is audio (and video) of one of their calls as captured by a recipient.

The pollsters are pissed about the group trying to pass off their calls as a survey:

Quote:
Is this a so-called "push poll," an attempt to communicate an negative message under the false guise of a survey? Of course it is. But that's not the way Davis sees it, according to the Washington Post:

    [Davis] questioned why McCain is characterizing the phone drive as an attempt to engage in push polling...Davis said the 45-second calls use a special technology that provides a different automated message, depending on how the recipient answers questions. Moreover, Davis said, "A strict push poll is delivering not-truthful information. Everything we say is factual and backed up.
The Review-Journal adds:

    Davis said the calls made by his group should not be called push polls because questions are asked of those called. "A human voice is recorded asking the questions," he said. "You respond with your voice. How you respond dictates the next question. We are gathering information.
What a crock. The recipients that receive these calls are told they are participating in a survey, not a promotional message. Davis may have the high tech cover of asking questions, but the clear intent is to communicate negative messages. Check their web site's About Page. The expressed purpose of Common Sense Values is "educating and informing citizens in an in-depth manner about public policy issues." They say nothing about gathering data or measuring public opinion. They dress up their calls as "surveys" to add false credibility. Would the recipients stay on the phone if told they were about to be "educated and informed?" "Common sense" tells you they would not. The guise of a survey is a sham.

If you don't believe me, ask my colleague Nancy Mathiowetz, president of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR):

    Asking questions does not make it a survey. These calls are clearly a fraud that harm the survey research profession.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jan, 2008 05:12 pm
word has it that Obama fathered a black child.
0 Replies
 
Gala
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Jan, 2008 01:57 pm
I thought Thomas Jefferson did that.

Now that F. Thompson is out of the race, Huckleberry will get his 2-3 voters.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Jan, 2008 03:01 pm
I suspect the Husker will be out soon. He's not getting the religious votes he needs to stay in. It between Mitt and Mc.

Whos yo daddy?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2008 04:12 pm
Quote:
HUCKABEE COMPARES AMERICA TO NAZI GERMANY

In a speech to the Florida Renewal Project Monday night, which in an unprecedented move was live streamed on the American Family Association's Web site, Mike Huckabee [..] implored the audience to renew their "commitment to Christ" and "to our nation, to its heritage, as well as to its future," adding "do we expect the seculars [sic] to do it? Do we expect the unbelievers to lead us, and if so, how will they lead us and where?" He then engaged in an extended description of his visit to the Israeli Holocaust Memorial Yad Vashem with his 11- year-old daughter, who asked, "why didn't somebody do something?" Huckabee, who has called abortion a "holocaust," then issued a dire warning:

    ... I pray that no father ever stands over the shoulder of his own daughter and after her witnessing the decline and the fall of a great nation, writes, and sees her write these words, "why didn't somebody do something?" You see, I believe the reason we're here is because we are the somebodies. And we're to do the something and if we don't, who will? And if we don't act now, when will it happen, and will it be too late? You leave this conference with this haunting question, and pray that no one would ever ask of you or of me, why didn't somebody do something.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2008 04:27 pm
Whew!
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2008 07:35 pm
I'm sure glad he's pacing for 4th place in FL right now.


I'm even happier about Rudy's 3rd place finsh though. That bastard is DONE!
0 Replies
 
Gala
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Feb, 2008 09:28 am
He's a nut-job, but he's keeping Romney from getting anywhere.

Do you realize that Romney's as a Mormon believes in creationism? He's one big question mark. As guv'ner o' Mass he was liberal-- pro-abortion, for gay marriage, etc. He excersised separation of church and state-- now, as he runs for the highest office in all the land he's blending church and state.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Mike Huckabee
  3. » Page 6
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 05/16/2025 at 09:07:13