0
   

Question for the left and right:

 
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 06:32 pm
Setanta wrote:
In the first place, i deny that Germans were "just Germans," and not tribal.


As my previous post shows to some extent the Germans were tribal.

Quote:
The Enabling Act, which the NSDAP used to dispense with democratic institutions in Germany in 1933, required a vote of two thirds of the Reichstag.


True. In order to get the necessary 2/3 vote the Nazis had to band together with the other nationalist parties, exclude the socialist/communist deputies from the Reichstag and then browbeat the centrists with threats and promises to get their votes.

Quote:
The NSDAP polled only 35% of the vote prior to the Reichstag fire, and when Hitler ran against Hindenberg for the office of President, he only polled 35% of the vote.


Let me clarify for the people here who may be historically illiterate. The Hitler-Hindenburg presidential election was a year or so before the Reichstag Fire. The first round of voting put Hindenburg, Hitler and the Communist Party candidate into a run-off where Hitler won 37% of the vote.

In the elections of July 31, 1932 the Nazi Party won 37.3% of the votes. In November 1932 the Nazis won 33.1% of the vote for the Reichstag. The Reichstag burned on February 27, 1933. On March 5, 1933 the Nazis won 43.9% of the Reichstag vote.

Quote:
After the unification of Germany, many Catholics found themselves in Protestant dominated regions of German,


Your documentation for this is what? Germany is divided geographically by religion. Catholics live mainly in the south, Lutherans live mainly in the north. The south had a sizeable Lutheran population at one time, but most of these Lutherans left the country- mainly coming to America in the decades before the American Revolution.

Quote:
Kaas' bargain with Hitler was to remove civil debilities from Catholics, to agree to protect minorities within Germany who were Catholic, such as Poles and Alsatians,


Alsace is a region that is separate from Germany. When the Enabling Act was approved in Germany, Alsace was under the control of France and Hitler had no jurisdiction.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 07:00 pm
flaja wrote:
Your documentation for this is what? Germany is divided geographically by religion. Catholics live mainly in the south, Lutherans live mainly in the north. The south had a sizeable Lutheran population at one time, but most of these Lutherans left the country- mainly coming to America in the decades before the American Revolution.


Your documentation for this claim is what?
The CIA World Factbook page on Germany
lists the population of Protestants in Germany as 34%, with 34% Catholics, 3.7% Muslim, and 28.3% unaffiliated. In 1817, King Frederick William III of Prussia forced a "re-unification" of the Lutheran and German Reformed Churches. At that time, many of the "Old Lutherans" left for North America or Australia, which might be what you are referring to. This page at Adherents-dot-com lists Lutherans as 30% of the German population, with more than 14 million adherents. Given that the CIA Factbook lists 34% Protestants in Germany, this means that Lutherans are overwhelmingly the majority of Protestants in Germany.

During the Napoleonic Wars, German Catholics had moved freely within those states from which modern Germany would be formed, and which the French had seized from Prussia after defeating them. After the defeat of Napoleon, the Prussians responded with laws outlawing "mixed marriages" of Protestants and Catholics, and requiring that all children of such unions must be raised Protestant. Catholics rioted, and were attacked by Protestant Germans in return, especially in the Rhineland and Westphalia, which had been organized as a separate kingdom ruled by Napoleon's brother Jerome. To quell the unrest, which the Prussian state chose to see as Catholic rabble-rousing, the Archbishop of Cologne was arrested. It was thereafter that the journalist Joseph Görres began the "political Catholicism" movement which called upon Catholics to unite to promote political equality of all denominations. I suggest that you do some reading on Herr Görres, and "political Catholicism." With the accession of Frederick William IV in 1840, the furor died down--he was not the religious bigot that his predecessor was.

Quote:
Alsace is a region that is separate from Germany. When the Enabling Act was approved in Germany, Alsace was under the control of France and Hitler had no jurisdiction.


I am well aware of the status of Alsace in 1933. I did not say that Alsace was a part of Germany. I referred to ethnic Poles and Alsatians within Germany who were Catholics. I am not responsible for your inability to understand what i have written clearly.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 09:04 pm
Setanta wrote:
Foofie wrote:
You're comparing Germans to Iraqis. I know nothing about Iraqis, but I thought Germany had a very cosmopolitan, cultured, sophisticated society prior to the Nazi regime. Is your comparison equating apples to apples?


Obviously you know nothing about Iraqis. Your comment appears to assume that the Iraquis were not cosmopolitan, cultured or sophisticated. Why do you make such an assumption? If Iraq had been a primitive, unsophisticated and uncultured nation, why would anyone suggest that they had programs to develop weapons of mass destruction? Do you allege that a nation can develop, from its own resources, a program to develop weapons of mass destruction while remaining uncultured and unsophisticated? Just what do you think it takes from a society to achieve sufficient technological sophistication to research, design, perfect, build and deploy weapons of mass destruction?

Did you think about what you were writing before you hit the submit button?


Since I specifically said above, "I know nothing about Iraqis...", how do you arrive at, "Your comment appears to assume that the Iraquis were not cosmopolitan, cultured or sophisticated."?

So, let me reiterate, I know nothing about Iraqis.

Also, since the thread seems to have addressed whether Germany is tribal or not (aka, "one people"), I think in the eyes of a German Jew, Germans were one people, or perhaps, based on their being good learners, and obedient, one Jew hating people. Like in the art of drawing, perspective is important.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 09:28 pm
Foofie wrote:
I think in the eyes of a German Jew, Germans were one people


do you know any German Jews? I've met a few over the years and I have to say I've rarely met people who were so aware of - and who felt it important to state - the differences between different German classes and peoples and cities.

The most consistently surprising to me is when the mother of a friend of mine who now lives in Israel ALWAYS points out what city in Germany she was living in at the beginning of the Second World War.

It is very important to her that we understand where she came from in Germany - the class - the people - the artistic community - the theatre ... she isn't just from any city, she's from X. She also still considers herself German vs Israeli, though she's lived in Israel for many decades and her husband was an Israeli diplomat. He represented Israel in other countries, while she still says she's German.

I've had similar experiences with other Jews now living in Israel, who were in Germany at the beginning of the war. Their self-identification is still as Germans - and as Germans from specific cities/communities/classes. There is no generic Germany/German for them.

Perhaps it's a particular generational effect, but it's been remarkably consistent about the German-Israeli Jews I've met over the decades.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 09:35 pm
Foofie wrote:
Foofie wrote:
You're comparing Germans to Iraqis. I know nothing about Iraqis, but I thought Germany had a very cosmopolitan, cultured, sophisticated society prior to the Nazi regime. Is your comparison equating apples to apples?


Since I specifically said above, "I know nothing about Iraqis...", how do you arrive at, "Your comment appears to assume that the Iraquis were not cosmopolitan, cultured or sophisticated."?


If you were not suggesting that Iraqis did not have a cosmopolitan, cultured,sophisticated society, what was the point of your apples to apples question?

Do you need to be told explicitly that components of Iraqi culture were cosmopolitan and sophisticated?

Do you want to learn about Iraq prior to the American invasion?
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 09:54 pm
ehBeth wrote:
Foofie wrote:
I think in the eyes of a German Jew, Germans were one people


do you know any German Jews? I've met a few over the years and I have to say I've rarely met people who were so aware of - and who felt it important to state - the differences between different German classes and peoples and cities.

The most consistently surprising to me is when the mother of a friend of mine who now lives in Israel ALWAYS points out what city in Germany she was living in at the beginning of the Second World War.

It is very important to her that we understand where she came from in Germany - the class - the people - the artistic community - the theatre ... she isn't just from any city, she's from X. She also still considers herself German vs Israeli, though she's lived in Israel for many decades and her husband was an Israeli diplomat. He represented Israel in other countries, while she still says she's German.

I've had similar experiences with other Jews now living in Israel, who were in Germany at the beginning of the war. Their self-identification is still as Germans - and as Germans from specific cities/communities/classes. There is no generic Germany/German for them.

Perhaps it's a particular generational effect, but it's been remarkably consistent about the German-Israeli Jews I've met over the decades.


First, your sample size, for your observations, is quite small. You can't do any statistical inferences with any degree of validity.

Second, I believe you put the emphasis on the wrong syllable, so to speak. Nazis didn't care how "German" a German Jew felt. The one criteria was whether one was deemed a Jew - period. And then it was off to the camps.

American Jews of Eastern European descent are aware that German Jews that came to the U.S., after the war (somehow survived), may tell people they are Germans. Jews of Eastern European descent usually will not point out to them that this is absurd, since Germans would have killed any Jew they could kill. So, usually other Jews just accept German Jews as sort of being in denial. And, since they survived the war, no one wants to offend them any more; they are usually humored.

But, your point is a non-sequitor, and in fact you are proving my initial point, that Germans are one people, if a German Jew can claim to be nothing but German (not a German Jew, not a German from a particular town, but a German).

By the way, as I've always heard, German Jews oftentimes felt (and oftentimes were) a few notches above Eastern European Jews in socio-economic class, so I don't doubt that German Jews don't want to identify with any Russian/Polish Jews.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 09:55 pm
Setanta wrote:
The CIA World Factbook page on Germany[/b][/url] lists the population of Protestants in Germany as 34%, with 34% Catholics, 3.7% Muslim, and 28.3% unaffiliated.


The percentages were likely different in 1933 and mere numbers don't say anything about the geographic distribution of the various religions. I would venture that in most parts of Germany either the Catholics or the Lutherans were in the overwhelming majority. Religious minorities within a given regin were likely rare.

You claim that Kass asked for an assortment of concessions from Hitler (who was officially a Catholic). But I don't see where the concessions would have been legally needed.

http://home.snafu.de/tilman/krasel/germany/gg.html

Article 136. (Weimar Constitution)
Civil and political rights and duties are neither dependent upon nor restricted by the practice of religious freedom.

The enjoyment of civil and political rights, as well as admission to official posts, is independent of religious creed.

No one is bound to disclose his religious convictions. The authorities have the right to make enquiries as to membership of a religious body only when rights and duties depend upon it, or when the collection of statistics ordered by law requires it.

No one may be compelled to take part in any ecclesiastical act or ceremony, or the use of any religious form of oath.

Article 137. (Weimar Constitution)
There is no state church.

Freedom of association is guaranteed to religious bodies. There are no restrictions as to the union of religious bodies within the territory of the Federation.

Each religious body regulates and administers its affairs independently within the limits of general laws. It appoints its officials without the cooperation of the Land, or of the civil community.

Religious bodies acquire legal rights in accordance with the general regulations of the civil code.

Religious bodies remain corporations with public rights in so far as they have been so up to the present.

Equal rights shall be granted to other religious bodies upon application, if their constitution and the number of their members offer a guarantee of permanency.

When several such religious bodies holding public rights combine to form one union this union becomes a corporation of a similar class.

Religious bodies forming corporations with public rights are entitled to levy taxes on the basis of the civil tax rolls, in accordance with the provisions of Land law.

Associations adopting as their work the common encouragement of a world-philosophy shall be placed upon an equal footing with religious bodies.
So far as the execution of these provisions may require further regulation, this is the duty of the Land legislature.

You are claiming that Kass asked for things that the Weimar Constitution (if obeyed) already gave him.

Quote:
In 1817, King Frederick William III of Prussia forced a "re-unification" of the Lutheran and German Reformed Churches. At that time, many of the "Old Lutherans" left for North America or Australia, which might be what you are referring to.


I am referring to the mass immigration of Protestant Germans to America in the wake of the Thirty Years War in the 17th century. During this war vast regions of southern Germany were routinely devastated by armies on both sides. Something like 1/3 of Germany's population was killed. After the Peace of Westphalia most Protestants in southern Germany took the opportunity to leave.

I have both Lutheran and German Reform ancestry (I have likely had Lutheran ancestors for as long as the world has had Lutherans). My ancestors donated the land on which both the oldest Lutheran and the oldest German Reformed church in western North Carolina still stand. The congregations of both churches are now Lutheran. A traveling preacher, who went through the region in the 18th century, once explained the difference between the Lutherans and German Reformed: One group says Unser Vater while the other says Vater unser. On theological matters there was never any real difference.

Quote:
During the Napoleonic Wars, German Catholics had moved freely within those states from which modern Germany would be formed, and which the French had seized from Prussia after defeating them. After the defeat of Napoleon, the Prussians responded with laws outlawing "mixed marriages" of Protestants and Catholics, and requiring that all children of such unions must be raised Protestant. Catholics rioted, and were attacked by Protestant Germans in return, especially in the Rhineland and Westphalia, which had been organized as a separate kingdom ruled by Napoleon's brother Jerome. To quell the unrest, which the Prussian state chose to see as Catholic rabble-rousing, the Archbishop of Cologne was arrested. It was thereafter that the journalist Joseph Görres began the "political Catholicism" movement which called upon Catholics to unite to promote political equality of all denominations. I suggest that you do some reading on Herr Görres, and "political Catholicism." With the accession of Frederick William IV in 1840, the furor died down--he was not the religious bigot that his predecessor was.


Merely the Thirty Years War acts II through VI.

Quote:
I referred to ethnic Poles and Alsatians within Germany who were Catholics.


Can you document how many Alsatians were living within Germany in 1933?

Quote:
I am not responsible for your inability to understand what i have written clearly.


I understood what you were saying; I was merely questioning the accuracy of what you claimed.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 09:58 pm
Foofie wrote:
Foofie wrote:
I think in the eyes of a German Jew, Germans were one people


Second, I believe you put the emphasis on the wrong syllable, so to speak. Nazis didn't care how "German" a German Jew felt. The one criteria was whether one was deemed a Jew - period.


Changing spots again.

I respond to your point - and you think we won't notice you deciding to change the point. It's not me working the 'wrong syllable'.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:00 pm
Foofie wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
... she isn't just from any city, she's from X.


But, your point is a non-sequitor, and in fact you are proving my initial point, that Germans are one people, if a German Jew can claim to be nothing but German (not a German Jew, not a German from a particular town, but a German).


X is a specific city in Germany.

She is a German Jew from a specific city.

I keep forgetting that you need short sentences.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:04 pm
Foofie wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
do you know any German Jews?


First, your sample size, for your observations, is quite small. You can't do any statistical inferences with any degree of validity.


Again, do you know any German Jews?
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:05 pm
flaja wrote:
I am referring to the mass immigration of Protestant Germans to America in the wake of the Thirty Years War in the 17th century. During this war vast regions of southern Germany were routinely devastated by armies on both sides. Something like 1/3 of Germany's population was killed. After the Peace of Westphalia most Protestants in southern Germany took the opportunity to leave.



What I learned in high school was that after the Revolution of 1848 many of the liberal Germans left Germany. That's when Germany started its slow move to the right, under Bismarck, the Kaiser, and finally Hitler.

Anyway, many of these liberal Germans came to the U.S. and moved to the mid-west (like Wisconsin), and were liberal politically and anti-slavery.

Prior to that there was not a large German population in the U.S. I was told. It was mostly British stock. I believe most of the Daughters of the American Revolution are WASPS.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:05 pm
Foofie wrote:
But, your point is a non-sequitor, and in fact you are proving my initial point, that Germans are one people, if a German Jew can claim to be nothing but German (not a German Jew, not a German from a particular town, but a German).


If the Germans are to be considered to be one people, why (as was pointed out in a previous post) do German Jews identify which city/region/class of Germany they came from? Would an American identify himself to a non-American by saying I am a Floridian or a New Yorker or a Texan?
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:09 pm
flaja wrote:
Foofie wrote:
But, your point is a non-sequitor, and in fact you are proving my initial point, that Germans are one people, if a German Jew can claim to be nothing but German (not a German Jew, not a German from a particular town, but a German).


If the Germans are to be considered to be one people, why (as was pointed out in a previous post) do German Jews identify which city/region/class of Germany they came from? Would an American identify himself to a non-American by saying I am a Floridian or a New Yorker or a Texan?


Oh yes! New Yorkers don't want to be mistaken for someone coming from somewhere else.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:12 pm
ehBeth wrote:
Foofie wrote:
Foofie wrote:
You're comparing Germans to Iraqis. I know nothing about Iraqis, but I thought Germany had a very cosmopolitan, cultured, sophisticated society prior to the Nazi regime. Is your comparison equating apples to apples?


Since I specifically said above, "I know nothing about Iraqis...", how do you arrive at, "Your comment appears to assume that the Iraquis were not cosmopolitan, cultured or sophisticated."?


If you were not suggesting that Iraqis did not have a cosmopolitan, cultured,sophisticated society, what was the point of your apples to apples question?

Do you need to be told explicitly that components of Iraqi culture were cosmopolitan and sophisticated?

Do you want to learn about Iraq prior to the American invasion?


Why would I want to learn about Iraq? Can we choose a cooler climate for me to learn about in this geography lesson? A nice termperate zone, with a cold winter.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:18 pm
ehBeth wrote:
Foofie wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
do you know any German Jews?


First, your sample size, for your observations, is quite small. You can't do any statistical inferences with any degree of validity.


Again, do you know any German Jews?


I have avoided knowing all Jews of German descent. Specifically, because they oftentimes like to tell of their German heritage. It's enough to hear from Christians, of German descent, about their "good German blood"; I don't have to hear any more of this national pride from anyone else that doesn't understand they are just Americans.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:26 pm
Foofie wrote:
I have avoided knowing all Jews of German descent. Specifically, because they oftentimes like to tell of their German heritage. It's enough to hear from Christians, of German descent, about their "good German blood"; I don't have to hear any more of this national pride from anyone else that doesn't understand they are just Americans.


You don't need to know or understand anything. Neither Iraq, nor German Jews. Choice, it's yours.
And I agree you don't need to hear more about national pride from anyone - you have certainly plenty enough of it yourself. But of course you have 'good' national pride, while others have mistaken, bad national pride.

Ignorance is bliss.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:29 pm
I was gonna post here hours ago, and I'm glad I didn't. It has gone a bit ugly...

What was this thread about... Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:34 pm
dagmaraka wrote:
Foofie wrote:
I have avoided knowing all Jews of German descent. Specifically, because they oftentimes like to tell of their German heritage. It's enough to hear from Christians, of German descent, about their "good German blood"; I don't have to hear any more of this national pride from anyone else that doesn't understand they are just Americans.


You don't need to know or understand anything. Neither Iraq, nor German Jews. Choice, it's yours.
And I agree you don't need to hear more about national pride from anyone - you have certainly plenty enough of it yourself. But of course you have 'good' national pride, while others have mistaken, bad national pride.

Ignorance is bliss.


Did you say something? I was busy marching around my American flag to a Souza march.

I'm really happy for you that you have an opinion.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:40 pm
Souza's dead Jack....

Welcome to America today. Shocked
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 07:18 am
Foofie wrote:
What I learned in high school was that after the Revolution of 1848 many of the liberal Germans left Germany. That's when Germany started its slow move to the right, under Bismarck, the Kaiser, and finally Hitler.


German immigration to America happened in two main waves. The first was before the American Revolution and was mainly for religious reasons. The second was after the failed 1848 revolutions in Europe and was mainly for political reasons.

Quote:
Anyway, many of these liberal Germans came to the U.S. and moved to the mid-west (like Wisconsin), and were liberal politically and anti-slavery.


The Pennsylvania Dutch also had a history of opposing slavery, but that didn't keep their descendants (including several of my ancestors) from joining the Confederate armies during the Rebellion.

Quote:
Prior to that there was not a large German population in the U.S. I was told.


You were told wrong. When the Revolutionary War ended the military escort that accompanied General Washington to his home was an all German-American outfit. Enough Germans settled in some places in America that their German dialects were still in everyday use until the time of the Civil War and in some places they were still in use until World War I. My great-great grandparents in North Carolina still knew how to speak their ancestral German dialect as late as the 1920s.

Roughly speaking almost half of the American population has German ancestry and almost half have British ancestry. I have both.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 08:29:35