What if they all went home?

Are you one of those who believes "if you aren't with me, you're agin me"?

You don't think they just might think differently than you, and not in a subversive way? Perhaps they're compassionate.

Mame wrote:

You don't think they just might think differently than you, and not in a subversive way? Perhaps they're compassionate.

They can take their compassion back over to the other side of the border. I-L-L-E-G-A-L.

Tell ya what. If we were to outlaw guns you own, that would make you an ILLEGAL. Do you think that the change of laws would make you a bad person for not following them?

No?

Why is it that when you break the law, it's a good thing, but when others do, it's a bad thing?

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Tell ya what. If we were to outlaw guns you own, that would make you an ILLEGAL. Do you think that the change of laws would make you a bad person for not following them?

No?

Why is it that when you break the law, it's a good thing, but when others do, it's a bad thing?

Cycloptichorn

At least I bought the guns legally in the first place. I didn't just walk into the gun shop and steal them when the owners weren't looking.

No. Why should I? So you can say we need to change the laws to allow illegals free entry? Eat me.

cjhsa wrote:

No. Why should I? So you can say we need to change the laws to allow illegals free entry? Eat me.

Well, I won't eat you - gamy and bitter would not be an appetizing meal.

And, I don't think that we should change the laws either. In fact, I'm in favor of closing the border.

What I'm not in favor of is your attitude which demonizes people and declares them to have bad intentions b/c they aren't following the law. It is clear that there are instances in which you wouldn't follow the law based upon your beliefs. Why is it that you are morally correct, but others are seeking to 'ruin America' and 'destroy the American way of life?' You have not addressed this.

Cycloptichorn

I'm out of here.

Bullshit. I've committed no crime. They have - in fact a very, very serious crime. But you don't care and wish instead to put their crime back on me and call me racist or xenophobic or whatever your granola box word of the day is. Again - eat me. I'm out of here.

mysteryman wrote:

I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them.
I found the article interesting is why I posted it.
Nothing more.

I read this article that said that 97% of all that oppose illegal immigration are members of the KKK, I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them. I found the article interesting is why I posted it.

dyslexia wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them.
I found the article interesting is why I posted it.
Nothing more.

I read this article that said that 97% of all that oppose illegal immigration are members of the KKK, I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them. I found the article interesting is why I posted it.

It might have been an interesting article with a unique point of view.
I would like to read it.

Because unlike some of you, I will read things that I dont agree with, just for a different perspective.

So, please send that article to me.

mysteryman wrote:

contrex wrote:

Seems like the oh-so-brave loudmouth OP has chickened out now his copied figures are being shown up as pure fiction.

Sorry to dissapoint you, but I'm still here.
Unlike you, I have a job and am not on here all day.
Its apparent that you dont have a job, or if you do you dont do it.

I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them.
I found the article interesting is why I posted it.
Nothing more.

I am curious why you found it interesting?

Was it because it had made up numbers?

Or was it because the made up numbers supported your preconceived ideas? Which would explain your failure to check any of the numbers I guess.

mysteryman wrote:

dyslexia wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them.
I found the article interesting is why I posted it.
Nothing more.

I read this article that said that 97% of all that oppose illegal immigration are members of the KKK, I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them. I found the article interesting is why I posted it.

It might have been an interesting article with a unique point of view.
I would like to read it.

Because unlike some of you, I will read things that I dont agree with, just for a different perspective.

So, please send that article to me.

Dude - there of course is no article. He was merely pointing out that posting an article, and then pretending that you aren't endorsing what it says, is a bullsh*t excuse.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

dyslexia wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them.
I found the article interesting is why I posted it.
Nothing more.

I read this article that said that 97% of all that oppose illegal immigration are members of the KKK, I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them. I found the article interesting is why I posted it.

It might have been an interesting article with a unique point of view.
I would like to read it.

Because unlike some of you, I will read things that I dont agree with, just for a different perspective.

So, please send that article to me.

Dude - there of course is no article. He was merely pointing out that posting an article, and then pretending that you aren't endorsing what it says, is a bullsh*t excuse.

Cycloptichorn

You mean he was lying and making up facts?

mysteryman wrote:

dyslexia wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them.
I found the article interesting is why I posted it.
Nothing more.

I read this article that said that 97% of all that oppose illegal immigration are members of the KKK, I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them. I found the article interesting is why I posted it.

It might have been an interesting article with a unique point of view.
I would like to read it.

Because unlike some of you, I will read things that I dont agree with, just for a different perspective.

So, please send that article to me.

Dude - there of course is no article. He was merely pointing out that posting an article, and then pretending that you aren't endorsing what it says, is a bullsh*t excuse.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

dyslexia wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them.
I found the article interesting is why I posted it.
Nothing more.

I read this article that said that 97% of all that oppose illegal immigration are members of the KKK, I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them. I found the article interesting is why I posted it.

It might have been an interesting article with a unique point of view.
I would like to read it.

Because unlike some of you, I will read things that I dont agree with, just for a different perspective.

So, please send that article to me.

Dude - there of course is no article. He was merely pointing out that posting an article, and then pretending that you aren't endorsing what it says, is a bullsh*t excuse.

Cycloptichorn

Actually, there are times when something is posted to spark discussion, nothing more.
You apparently have never learned that it is possible to find something interesting without agreeing with it.
You should learn that.

BTW, how do you know there is no article that he alluded to?
Or are you saying that since you havent seen it or read it that it doesnt exist?

I read this article that said that 97% of all that oppose illegal immigration are members of the KKK, I did not write those numbers, nor did I research them. I found the article interesting is why I posted it.