dagmaraka wrote:So, tell us, Thomas. What do you like?
Well, I'm male, 38, incredibly affluent, unbelievably good-looking, and single. No really -- it's a shame the dog ate my picture. Oops, wrong online community ....
dagmaraka wrote: Are you an urbanite? Or do you like to wake to birds chirping outside your windows (and i don't mean pigeons)? A mix?
No, I think I'm not really an urbanite. I find it important to have a city nearby, and I don't mind living
in one -- but I don't have to. Birds chirping outside my window would absolutely be a plus. My ideal mix is close to what I have here in Munich. I live in the city, pretty close to where Walter's star marks it, but roads are lined with trees, so I can have both the city
and the birds. That's pretty cool, and I'd love a place like this near Iselin. Also, the city doesn't have to be large to qualify as a "real" city for me. New Brunswick (pop. 110,000) would qualify, for example.
dagmaraka wrote:Can you handle NYC (I know I can't, not even if I lived smack in the middle of the Central Park or other greenery)?
I could, and I love New York City. But I'm not sure I'm crazy enough about it to pay its astronomic rents.
dagmaraka wrote: Can you handle the suburbs?
European suburbs maybe, but the mass-produced sprawl that's so typical for American suburbs depresses me. I might make an exception for suburbs with a historic core, with homes available in the core.
dagmaraka wrote: In an ideal world, what would your living situation be?
Within a city, preferably a pre-Depression part of town, with trees, parks, and other enclaves of nature in walking distance. Shops for everyday purchases in walking distance too. Not too far from work (say, 30 minutes)
Good questions! They helped a lot in framing the issue. Thanks!