1
   

Army Corp considers mass relocation in MS

 
 
JPB
 
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 08:45 am
Quote:
BAY ST. LOUIS, MISS. -- This coastal resort town is on the front line of a project to gauge support for a mass federal buyout of 17,000 homes near Mississippi's Katrina-ravaged shore. This could become the nation's most significant attempt to radically reconfigure coastal communities -- converting huge swaths of flood-prone residential lots to public wetlands.

Until now, the Army Corps of Engineers has reserved buyouts for areas prone to river flooding. Some people, such as Susan I. Rees, the director of the corps project, believe the current assessment is the beginning of a serious national debate on whether Americans should retreat from the coasts. The costs and risks of future flooding are simply too great, they say -- especially if, as many believe, sea levels are rising and hurricanes are starting to get stronger. More


I agree with the lady who wonders why they're hearing about this now after spending two years of hard work and tons of money on rebuilding after Katrina.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 966 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 31 Oct, 2007 10:33 am
There's no need for the government to step in. Pretty soon coastal property owners will be unable to obtain any homeowner's insurance, which will make it impossible for them to obtain mortgages or home loans, which will effectively make it impossible for them to stay there.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 31 Oct, 2007 02:17 pm
I had thought that there had been a Reagan-era bill which provided government loan guarantees and home owner's insurance subsidies for owners of coastal properties. Was i dreaming? Has it expired? Mayhap i'll do some research. (Then again, maybe not.)
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 31 Oct, 2007 02:25 pm
This page at Kentucky-dot-gov (?) includes a history of the National Flood Insurance Program. Apparently, if the information provided on that page is correct and complete, the Reagan administration's initiative was to make the NFIP self-supporting, without relying upon tax revenues. The article states that the National Flood Insurance Act was passed in 1968.

If my laziness remains in abeyance, i'll see if i can find some more.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 31 Oct, 2007 02:38 pm
Further research shows that i had that Reagan-era initiative completely wrong. The 1982 Coastal Barriers Resource Act excluded several various categories of coastal features (barrier islands, bars, spits, and adjacent estuaries and wetlands) from federal assistance programs, specifically naming the National Flood Insurance Program.

My reading indicates that there have been several acts since 1982 which have removed certain areas from the CBRS (coastal barrier resources system), making them eligible for Federal subsidy, including the NFIP.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 31 Oct, 2007 04:05 pm
It's not just flood insurance, Setanta, coastal homeowners soon won't be able to get any insurance for their homes.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Army Corp considers mass relocation in MS
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 05:56:10