Reply
Mon 15 Oct, 2007 11:07 am
Librarians Under New Management
by julia silverman / associated press writer
OCT 4, 2007
MEDFORD, Ore. (AP) -- A big, red "Closed" sign has been plastered across the front door of the library here since mid-April, when Jackson County ran out of money to keep its 15 branches open.
In a few weeks, though, the sign will come down and the doors will be flung open again, now that the county has come up with an unusual cost-saving solution: outsourcing its libraries.
The county will continue to own the buildings and all the books in them. But the libraries will be managed by an outside company for a profit. And the librarians will no longer be public employees and union members; they will be on the company's payroll.
Library patrons might not notice much difference, but the librarians will, since the company plans to get by with a smaller staff and will have a free hand to set salaries and benefits.
"The average citizen, when they walk into the library, they will see well-trained, well-educated, customer-service-oriented people working in the library," said Bob Windrow, director of sales and marketing at Germantown, Md-based Library Systems and Services, or LSSI, the company taking over. "They won't know who is paying their salary, and they won't care. They care whether the library is open adequate hours, and are they getting good service."
For years, state and local governments have been privatizing certain functions, such as trash collection, payroll processing and road maintenance.
But contracting with an outside company to run a library is a relatively new phenomenon, one that has been gaining in popularity as communities from Jackson County, Tenn., to Redding, Calif., look for ways to save money.
The practice has generated a backlash from those who argue that municipalities are employing a backdoor method of union-busting, and those who say that such profit-making ventures go against the notion that libraries are one of the noblest functions of government in a democracy.
"This is a shift from the public trust into private hands," said John Sexton, an out-of-work Jackson County librarian who has interviewed with LSSI for his old job. "Libraries have always been a source of information for everyone and owned by no one."
Most of the 15 or so U.S. municipalities that have outsourced their libraries has signed on with LSSI, which is the biggest player in the field but is privately held and does not disclose earnings.
Jackson County lost 36 percent of its budget in one fell swoop last year when Congress failed to renew the rich subsidies designed to help parts of the country where logging has been hurt by endangered-species regulations. Rather than cut back on, say, law enforcement, county officials closed the libraries. (Congress later approved a one-year extension of the logging subsidies.)
Book lovers complained bitterly about the closings, but two ballot measures to raise taxes and reopen the libraries fell short. Then LSSI offered to run the libraries, underbidding the public employees union.
The contract with LSSI will be worth around $3 million a year; the county will also budget $1.3 million to maintain the buildings. Combined, that is about half of the $8 million a year the county previously spent on its libraries.
However, the libraries will be open a total of only 24 hours a week, compared with 40-plus hours for most branches before the shutdown. And LSSI plans to hire 50 to 60 full-time employees, down from 88 under county management.
The county will retain control over certain policies, such as late fees, the cost of a library card, or how long library patrons can keep a best-seller.
But LSSI will be in charge of buying books and says it will use its muscle to obtain deep discounts from suppliers. It will also be responsible for hiring, and says that while its salaries will be comparable to what the employees were making previously, the benefits will be less generous. The workers will lose the right to participate in Oregon's pension system for public employees and instead will qualify for a 401(k) program.
Many former staff members are interviewing for their old jobs, meaning library patrons are likely to see some familiar faces when they check out a book. But there won't be enough jobs for everyone. And some have yet to decide whether to go back.
"I am taking a wait-and-see approach," said Amy Kinard, who worked for the library system for 17 years. "I am not hopeful for a job, but I am trying to stay open to the benefits of working for them."
Some bibliophiles fear that the library, under distant, corporate management, will be less attuned to local interests when buying books and will stock the shelves with lots of best-sellers.
"Does this company understand local needs?" asked Loriene Roy, president of the American Library Association, which opposes library outsourcing. "We have long regarded libraries as different. We deal with intangibles. We are not profit-driven."
Riverside County, Calif., one of California's fastest-growing regions, is widely seen as the pioneer in library outsourcing. The county signed with LSSI in 1997 and has stuck with the company; a 2002 study found that Riverside County library patrons were generally pleased with the services.
In just the last year, Texas cities San Juan and Leander, California cities Redding and Moorpark and the Jackson-Madison County library system in Tennessee have joined LSSI's ranks.
In Bedford, Texas, outside of Fort Worth, Mayor Jim Story cast the tie-breaking vote in August against allowing LSSI to take over the libraries.
"The salaries were going to be pretty low, and I was afraid that that would lead to high turnover of their own employees," Story said. "Plus I did not think that they would have the manpower to handle the quality of service that we now have in our library. I wasn't willing to that risk."
Fargo, N.D., cut its ties with LSSI in 2003, after concerns that the company had not paid its bills on time, while Jersey City, N.J., dropped its contract in 2001 after the mayor who had vouched for LSSI left office.
Back in Oregon, Jim Olney, director of the Jackson County Library Foundation, considers himself a union supporter, but said: "Look, if it is either close the libraries or outsource them, we'd rather have outsourcing. Sometimes you have to go for the difficult choice because there is no easy choice."
I think many conventional paper-based libraries have to some fair degree outlived their general usefulness.
Don't say that, Chumly! I'm going to library school! <gulp>
Ah, cypher, I'll tell m'Mom; she's a retired Reference Librarian.
Chumly -- most libraries aren't strictly paper-based, at least not the ones I know. They tend to have a lot of computer stuff going on (plus help with job searches, etc.). Plus, and this is something we've all noticed here on A2K, there are a lot of people out there who are clueless when it comes to knowing how to search for information. Research is not working for them because they just don't have the skill. Libraries and librarians in particular can help with nurturing that kind of self-reliant skill. And, even if they know how to search, a lot of folks don't know how to interpret that information or how to spot bias. This is another area for librarians to help with.
jespah
jespah, when my children were growing up, we always made at least one trip to the library each week to come home with our arms full of books (up to the limit allowed). Book reading got them off to a good start and served them well all of their lives.
I may be nostalgic, but I think today's children are missing a lot by not spending hours in a library, stimulating their curiousity.
BBB
why do i get the feeling the shelves won't carry any titles that criticise the people that now own the library?
"the problem with monsanto - oh yeah, that goes in 'discard.'"
I'd be bored out of my gord without the nearby library within walking distance from my apartment. I can't afford to buy the number of books it takes to feed my love of reading.
I make the trip about every three weeks and come home with a dozen books at a time. The best thing about it is the library's catalog is online and I can request books from all over the county and have them delivered to my neighborhood branch for pick up. They have DVDs and audio tapes too. Takes about 10 minutes to fill in the requests and about 3 days to receive notices that they've all arrived. If I time it just right the next batch of requests will be there when I return the ones I've finished reading. The good thing about my library is there is no limit on the number of books you can check out. I keep testing it. Last time I requested and checked out 16 of them and no one blinked. They just wonder if the load will all fit in my book bag.
Paper books will never go out of style. Not everyone has an easy time reading from a computer screen nor are they able or willing to sit in front of a computer screen for lengths of time. Listening to someone else's interpretation of the accents, cadence and emotions of the words on audio tapes just doesn't cut it. I prefer to let my own brain do the job as I read along. And there's nothing like taking a good book to bed to read until you fall asleep or sitting out in the morning sun reading while listening to birds. You just can't do that with something you have to plug in.
What concerns me about libraries being privatized is the vulnerability they will be exposed to for censorship and pruning of "undesireable" topics and authors.
Quote:Paper books will never go out of style. Not everyone has an easy time reading from a computer screen nor are they able or willing to sit in front of a computer screen for lengths of time.
Quote:What concerns me about libraries being privatized is the vulnerability they will be exposed to for censorship and pruning of "undesireable" topics and authors.
not to mention that in small ways, they could make sure the library provides less in the way of "competition."
for instance, by leaving books in the back ("oh, that's where it went!") which are currently being promoted at a bookstore, if the library is owned by one.
another thing about a bookstore owning a library, is they could find subtle ways to make the browser less welcome. borders (a store i like, but it has its moments) does plenty of profit, and even offer comfortable chairs to sit in, but the very large ones play music that make it twice as difficult to read. and it's technically a music store-
imagine a music store (for example) running a library, using "music-store ideas" instead of library ones. put a coffee bar in!
if it introduces pests that eat hard-to-find books, who cares? profits are up, competition is down...
Agreeing with Butrflynet and wishing my library was closer...
One of the Nobel Prize winners in Economics criticized using free market principles for public goods. It doesn't work as well. You can see with public broadcasting not supported by public funds you end up with a goof for a president. With national defense shoved into private companies like Blackwater you have a lawless bunch of mercenaries.
jespah wrote:Ah, cypher, I'll tell m'Mom; she's a retired Reference Librarian.
Chumly -- most libraries aren't strictly paper-based, at least not the ones I know. They tend to have a lot of computer stuff going on (plus help with job searches, etc.). Plus, and this is something we've all noticed here on A2K, there are a lot of people out there who are clueless when it comes to knowing how to search for information. Research is not working for them because they just don't have the skill. Libraries and librarians in particular can help with nurturing that kind of self-reliant skill. And, even if they know how to search, a lot of folks don't know how to interpret that information or how to spot bias. This is another area for librarians to help with.
Yes I am ware of what libraries are
trying to become, but the more the world moves towards information decentralization, the less need there is for a government sponsored, overly centralized, brick and mortar, mega-sized, institutionalized, anachronistic monstrosities like libraries whether they have computers and high speed data throughput or not, it makes no real difference.
Few people seem to truly understand the longer term implications of massive information decentralization.
It's already stupidly easy to own many-many Terabytes of data on a home PC let alone cheap high-speed throughput.
Government sponsored intermediaries such as a libraries have / will become an anachronism regardless of whether they continue to be promoted / worshiped.
As far your beliefs about search engines, just wait until A.I. in concert (pun) with speech recognition, blended with mobile high-speed data throughout hits prime-time!
Even a moron will then be able to "access the world".
His personalized ever-learning, ever-adapting AI search engine will "understand", anticipate and guide him better than any librarian whom could not possibly "know" him as well.
talk72000 wrote:One of the Nobel Prize winners in Economics criticized using free market principles for public goods. It doesn't work as well. You can see with public broadcasting not supported by public funds you end up with a goof for a president. With national defense shoved into private companies like Blackwater you have a lawless bunch of mercenaries.
The problem with that specious argument is that anything could be classified as "public goods" for the sake of whatever expediency flits the notions of the times.
This guy sounds more like a Nobel prize wiener unable to qualify his definitions outside of the very immediate context.
Butrflynet wrote:Paper books will never go out of style.
Yes they will, in fact "Paper books" are a rather modern invention in terms of being popularly available.
The technologies to supplant "Paper books" are obvious and abundant however as discussed in my prior post many can't / won't / don't seem to see it.
How many people get together to hear a family member play the spinet?
Chumly wrote:The technologies to supplant "Paper books" are obvious and abundant
and inferior in many ways. i imagine that in the future, most reading will be done on electronic devices, at least in areas where that's easily affordable. a paper book can be left unattended for a hundred years and still be picked up and read from, even if by then many of them may or may not be in poor condition.
books do have a charm about them that can't be replaced by a number of alternatives, and it would be a pity to see the march of "progress" tread on them as though newer is always better in all circumstances.
newer is often better, and the new will often replace the old. on the other hand, people still buy tape measures when they can get lasers, ordinary screwdrivers despite black and decker, glass bottles instead of plastic, cast iron pans instead of aluminum or steel, oil lamps, pencil and paper (will we still have those, or will everyone in the future use photoshop exclusively?) and just imagine, despite all our yacking on the internet and more than a century on the telephone we still occasionally talk to people face to face.
not to spit at progress or anything, it's fundamentalism i take issue with. i don't fancy the thought of a plasma tv on every wall, either. i rather like books, thank you, i see no reason not to indulge in them within reason. there's still a bit of room for balance between the old and the new, you know.
Future displays will not be limited to the 2 dimensional-conventional LCD (hey it rhymes).
You are forgetting about 3 dimensional holograms. You are forgetting about all the other data I / O methodologists that can embrace the human 5 senses*, bearing in mind (pun) of course that a direct mental linkup is also certainly in the cards.
I use the word "forgetting" euphemistically to make a point, and I reasonably exhume you already know the content of this post to be likely.
*popularly called "multi-media" this integration has barely started.
tinygiraffe wrote:books do have a charm about them that can't be replaced by a number of alternatives,
Where is your family spinet if you are so enamored with certain arbitrary period technologies / methodologies to the exception of certain other arbitrary period technologies / methodologies?
tinygiraffe wrote:i see no reason not to indulge in them within reason.
There is at least one very good reason, printed paper products, and everything that goes into their manufacture, shipping, storage, and disposal on a global basis is highly ecologically unsound.
Chumly wrote:You are forgetting about 3 dimensional holograms.
they're easy to forget, i've never seen one.
Quote:You are forgetting about all the other data I / O methodologists that can embrace the human 5 senses*
obviously not, i watched a dvd *and* youtube today.
Quote:bearing in mind (pun) of course that a direct mental linkup is also certainly in the cards.
oh bloody hell, no. there's enough weaseling into our brains using television and radio and newspapers without that crap, thanks but kill me first.
Quote:I use the word "forgetting" euphemistically to make a point, and I reasonably exhume you already know the content of this post to be likely.
i've played the futurist before, and it's 2007 now, and flying cars have come and gone. right now we're trying to find fuel for cars with wheels, and hoping our brilliant weaponry from over half a century ago doesn't kill us all.
look, i'm a dreamer like you are, there's no limits on humanity, but seeing a need to upgrade everything (ever see the cybermen on dr. who? great stuff, trek got the borg that way) is some kind of disease. every once in a while, nature does just fine without us. cockroaches haven't changed much in a million years. they're disgusting, but they work. they have no need to upgrade in a fundamental way. lots of things are like that.
Quote:Where is your family spinet if you are so enamored with certain arbitrary period technologies
i can't believe you brought up that ridiculous example twice. do you honestly believe it refutes anything i've said about books? frankly, i think a hologram would be a lot worse on the eyes than paper, but maybe they'll be *that good...*
news flash, the future is no less arbitrary a point in time than any other. economic balance on the other hand, is a timeless theme, one worked out by nature billions of years before we ever existed, and we're still coming to terms with merely beginning to grasp it.
it wasn't very long ago that humans though the earth itself was an endless source to be exploited, now we're trying to develop some kind of sanity. if you're so in love with the future (hey, she's alright but she's a bit too keen on herself) why not embrace the new, modern idea that even if you can have it all, it might not be "the best thing" we thought it was?
that would certainly be an upgrade.
His/her argument says nothing about how this technology will replace the true purpose of libraries in the first place. How will people (including students) who can't afford to purchase the equipment/media continue to have shared access to the information found in libraries if it is all going to reside in our homes?
Butrflynet wrote:How will people (including students) who can't afford to purchase the equipment/media continue to have shared access to the information found in libraries if it is all going to reside in our homes?
s/he really did miss a point there, you're right. regardless of the medium, corporate control of public library information is a recipe for disaster. holograms wouldn't make any difference there. one of the things about the romanticism of technology is that people are so excited by the perks that they don't mind if things that are obviously important are lost. it's a tradeoff. you have a tradeoff for keeping old things too of course, but for some reason that's the only important one to some people, not necessarily in this thread. i like progress, sometimes, i just don't see why we should be its bitch.
The other thing is the new technologies Chumly talks about are decades down the road. What is described in that article with the private take over of our public libraries is happening today.
It is great that we'll have all these wonderful technologies several decades from now, but that doesn't mean we should give up on paper books and public access to them during the transition period. That would be sacrificing access to educational materials for a whole generation of students.
tinygiraffe wrote:that would certainly be an upgrade.
I did not say change in this context must mean better as your use of the word "upgrade" infers. Alas a bit a a straw man on your part.
Yep I do like my spinet argument but not for the reason you put forward, but because it illustrates the absurdness / arbitrariness of approve-disapprove re: technological change.
Nope I am not a dreamer in the sense you appear to mean, and yes learning A.I. is definitely on it's way as is direct neural I/O. In fact learning A.I is much more plausible than a sky filled with flying cars from a technological / sociological / logistical perspective.
Nope there was in fact no time when flying cars were a likelihood due to the basic physics of power / weight / acoustics, and there will not be such a time unless or until a power source comes along that has a significantly higher power to weight ratio in concert with a significantly lower acoustic signature than burning petrochemicals in concert with rotating thrusters.