Clinton Proposes $5000 "baby bonds".

give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix

That argument (give it to the war machine) is stupid, yet typical of the liberal socialist mindset.

How about giving "it" back to the taxpayer?

When you loonies have no argument for a particuliar point of view, you throw out such stupid remarks that make you look more silly to the objective observer than you are.

Thanks for the help Mr. Literal.

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix

That argument (give it to the war machine) is stupid, yet typical of the liberal socialist mindset.

How about giving "it" back to the taxpayer?

When you loonies have no argument for a particuliar point of view, you throw out such stupid remarks that make you look more silly to the objective observer than you are.

Parados: Wait.... she said that! De facto, live and in living color. Read earlier posts for references.

woiyo wrote:

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix

That argument (give it to the war machine) is stupid, yet typical of the liberal socialist mindset.

How about giving "it" back to the taxpayer?

When you loonies have no argument for a particuliar point of view, you throw out such stupid remarks that make you look more silly to the objective observer than you are.

You see Conservatives giving 'it' back to the taxpayer any time recently?

The foreign adventures for our military are the equivalent of massive tax increases, you know.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

woiyo wrote:

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix

That argument (give it to the war machine) is stupid, yet typical of the liberal socialist mindset.

How about giving "it" back to the taxpayer?

When you loonies have no argument for a particuliar point of view, you throw out such stupid remarks that make you look more silly to the objective observer than you are.

You see Conservatives giving 'it' back to the taxpayer any time recently?

The foreign adventures for our military are the equivalent of massive tax increases, you know.

Cycloptichorn

Since I'm not a "conservative" I can be objective in saying that they too have not reduced my taxes to any large degree recently. Nor have they increased them.

Why you tring to change the subject? Unable to support this new socialist plan by "Hitlery"? How come you are not embracing it to a point that you think it should be retroactive to any child born in the past 7 years? Lord knows "bushie" has really screwed them and the "village" must correct this terrible error.

parados wrote:

woiyo wrote:

Did anyone ask WHY the taxpayers should give 5K to anyone who has a child?

Who suggested that everyone that has a child gets $5000?

Why don't you try asking questions about the proposed program?

Might have something to do with this...

Quote:

"I like the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that will grow over time, so when that young person turns 18, if they have finished high school, they will be able to access it to go to college," Clinton said.

Cycloptichorn wrote:

woiyo wrote:

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix

That argument (give it to the war machine) is stupid, yet typical of the liberal socialist mindset.

How about giving "it" back to the taxpayer?

When you loonies have no argument for a particuliar point of view, you throw out such stupid remarks that make you look more silly to the objective observer than you are.

You see Conservatives giving 'it' back to the taxpayer any time recently?

The foreign adventures for our military are the equivalent of massive tax increases, you know.

Cycloptichorn

Since I'm not a "conservative" I can be objective in saying that they too have not reduced my taxes to any large degree recently. Nor have they increased them.

Why you tring to change the subject? Unable to support this new socialist plan by "Hitlery"? How come you are not embracing it to a point that you think it should be retroactive to any child born in the past 7 years? Lord knows "bushie" has really screwed them and the "village" must correct this terrible error.

Ok, I stand corrected. She didn't say that, she merely made a comment in that direction. HUH?

Halfback

Parados - Don't be so hard on yourself. Your ignorance to this issue I thought was corrected. However, stupidityis tough to overcome.

Halfback wrote:

Ok, I stand corrected. She didn't say that, she merely made a comment in that direction. HUH?

Halfback

There's a difference between a policy platform proposal, and talking about an idea. Wouldn't you agree?

Cycloptichorn

Halfback wrote:

Ok, I stand corrected. She didn't say that, she merely made a comment in that direction. HUH?

Halfback

There's a difference between a policy platform proposal, and talking about an idea. Wouldn't you agree?

Cycloptichorn

you could have went to properties on the picture...

McGentrix: Well said! We are akin in our thinking on the topic.

Roxxxanne: Where in the world did you EVER come up with the idea that I (or anyone else, for that matter) owes YOUR children anything at all?