1
   

Clinton Proposes $5000 "baby bonds".

 
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:02 am
give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix Laughing
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:05 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix Laughing


That argument (give it to the war machine) is stupid, yet typical of the liberal socialist mindset.

How about giving "it" back to the taxpayer?

When you loonies have no argument for a particuliar point of view, you throw out such stupid remarks that make you look more silly to the objective observer than you are.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:07 am
woiyo wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix Laughing


That argument (give it to the war machine) is stupid, yet typical of the liberal socialist mindset.

How about giving "it" back to the taxpayer?

When you loonies have no argument for a particuliar point of view, you throw out such stupid remarks that make you look more silly to the objective observer than you are.


You see Conservatives giving 'it' back to the taxpayer any time recently?

The foreign adventures for our military are the equivalent of massive tax increases, you know.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:08 am
McGentrix wrote:
Thanks for the help Mr. Literal. Rolling Eyes

Your welcome Mr Overblown Hyperbole.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:10 am
woiyo wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix Laughing


That argument (give it to the war machine) is stupid, yet typical of the liberal socialist mindset.

How about giving "it" back to the taxpayer?

When you loonies have no argument for a particuliar point of view, you throw out such stupid remarks that make you look more silly to the objective observer than you are.

No stupider than claiming Hillary is proposing to give $5000 to everyone that has a baby.
0 Replies
 
Halfback
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:17 am
Parados: Wait.... she said that! De facto, live and in living color. Read earlier posts for references. Subsequent posts have devolved into name calling, etc. But, the fact remains that she did propose just that.

Wait, I've got a better idea! How about giving ME $5,000 for having survived in this madhouse country long enough to retire. Razz

Halfback
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:25 am
Halfback wrote:
Parados: Wait.... she said that! De facto, live and in living color. Read earlier posts for references.


Actually she didn't say that. Read earlier posts for references.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:25 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
woiyo wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix Laughing


That argument (give it to the war machine) is stupid, yet typical of the liberal socialist mindset.

How about giving "it" back to the taxpayer?

When you loonies have no argument for a particuliar point of view, you throw out such stupid remarks that make you look more silly to the objective observer than you are.


You see Conservatives giving 'it' back to the taxpayer any time recently?

The foreign adventures for our military are the equivalent of massive tax increases, you know.

Cycloptichorn


Since I'm not a "conservative" I can be objective in saying that they too have not reduced my taxes to any large degree recently. Nor have they increased them.

Why you tring to change the subject? Unable to support this new socialist plan by "Hitlery"? How come you are not embracing it to a point that you think it should be retroactive to any child born in the past 7 years? Lord knows "bushie" has really screwed them and the "village" must correct this terrible error.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:27 am
woiyo wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
woiyo wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix Laughing


That argument (give it to the war machine) is stupid, yet typical of the liberal socialist mindset.

How about giving "it" back to the taxpayer?

When you loonies have no argument for a particuliar point of view, you throw out such stupid remarks that make you look more silly to the objective observer than you are.


You see Conservatives giving 'it' back to the taxpayer any time recently?

The foreign adventures for our military are the equivalent of massive tax increases, you know.

Cycloptichorn


Since I'm not a "conservative" I can be objective in saying that they too have not reduced my taxes to any large degree recently. Nor have they increased them.

Why you tring to change the subject? Unable to support this new socialist plan by "Hitlery"? How come you are not embracing it to a point that you think it should be retroactive to any child born in the past 7 years? Lord knows "bushie" has really screwed them and the "village" must correct this terrible error.



I don't think anyone is supporting 'the plan'......because there isn't a plan, she made a comment. Before support could be provided many more details are required and needed (such as 'How do we pay for it").

What most of these posts have moved on to is discussing the priorities that we have as a nation (education vs occupation for example) with a few side bars.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:33 am
McGentrix wrote:
parados wrote:
woiyo wrote:
Did anyone ask WHY the taxpayers should give 5K to anyone who has a child?

Who suggested that everyone that has a child gets $5000?

Why don't you try asking questions about the proposed program?


Might have something to do with this...

Quote:
"I like the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that will grow over time, so when that young person turns 18, if they have finished high school, they will be able to access it to go to college," Clinton said.


Parados - Don't be so hard on yourself. Your ignorance to this issue I thought was corrected. However, stupidityis tough to overcome.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:34 am
woiyo wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
woiyo wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
give it to the war machine instead...folks... make bushco richer and richer.....

downloaded....that's a hoot....and revealing.... probably preferable to having sex with McGentrix Laughing


That argument (give it to the war machine) is stupid, yet typical of the liberal socialist mindset.

How about giving "it" back to the taxpayer?

When you loonies have no argument for a particuliar point of view, you throw out such stupid remarks that make you look more silly to the objective observer than you are.


You see Conservatives giving 'it' back to the taxpayer any time recently?

The foreign adventures for our military are the equivalent of massive tax increases, you know.

Cycloptichorn


Since I'm not a "conservative" I can be objective in saying that they too have not reduced my taxes to any large degree recently. Nor have they increased them.

Why you tring to change the subject? Unable to support this new socialist plan by "Hitlery"? How come you are not embracing it to a point that you think it should be retroactive to any child born in the past 7 years? Lord knows "bushie" has really screwed them and the "village" must correct this terrible error.


I don't think it's an entirely terrible idea, but it needs a little work other then just an offhand comment.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Halfback
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:34 am
Ok, I stand corrected. She didn't say that, she merely made a comment in that direction. HUH? Rolling Eyes

Halfback
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:35 am
Halfback wrote:
Ok, I stand corrected. She didn't say that, she merely made a comment in that direction. HUH? Rolling Eyes

Halfback


There's a difference between a policy platform proposal, and talking about an idea. Wouldn't you agree?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:39 am
There is a difference between creating an account for a child and giving the parents money.

If there is no difference then Bush proposed giving money to the parents of every minor child that pays SS when he proposed private SS accounts.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:42 am
woiyo wrote:

Parados - Don't be so hard on yourself. Your ignorance to this issue I thought was corrected. However, stupidityis tough to overcome.


We are all rooting for you woiyo......

heck, maybe we'll give you a nice shiny medal just for participating.
0 Replies
 
Halfback
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:55 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Halfback wrote:
Ok, I stand corrected. She didn't say that, she merely made a comment in that direction. HUH? Rolling Eyes

Halfback


There's a difference between a policy platform proposal, and talking about an idea. Wouldn't you agree?

Cycloptichorn


Agreed! I never considered it a real proposal anyway, just vote pandering to select audiance. Laughing

Halfback
0 Replies
 
Halfback
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 11:57 am
At least I hope not! :wink:

Halfback
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 12:07 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Halfback wrote:
Ok, I stand corrected. She didn't say that, she merely made a comment in that direction. HUH? Rolling Eyes

Halfback


There's a difference between a policy platform proposal, and talking about an idea. Wouldn't you agree?

Cycloptichorn


Not when you stand before a politiclly sponsered event by the Black Caucus.
If the comment was made to the media, I might agree, but not in this forum.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2007 03:21 pm
maporsche wrote:


you could have went to properties on the picture...


Looks like someone failed ENGLISH 101!
Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2007 01:47 pm
Halfback wrote:
McGentrix: Well said! We are akin in our thinking on the topic.

Roxxxanne: Where in the world did you EVER come up with the idea that I (or anyone else, for that matter) owes YOUR children anything at all?


My children? Who said anything about my children? Re-read my post and my previous posts on the thread. And do try keeping up.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/13/2022 at 11:53:51