Quote:
``
The real enemy of tax reform is the spending culture in Washington. Let me repeat: we will
never have tax reform in this country until Congress changes its spending habits. The reform rhetoric, regardless of which party it comes from, never changes the reality that federal spending grows every year``-----
Ron Paul
Our founding fathers addressed the very issue Ron Paul complains of, but Ron Paul, to the best of my knowledge, has not expounded upon our Founding Father`s solution which is already in our Constitution! As a matter of fact, our Constitution`s original tax plan is not being promoted by any big media recognized ``conservatives``, including Newt Gingrich, with his latest gimmick called American Solutions. (1)
Unlike the proposals our self anointed ``conservatives`` offer [flat tax, fair tax, national sales tax, value added tax], which offer nothing to make members of Congress immediately accountable for reckless spending and borrowing, our Constitution`s original tax plan does in fact provide a very real mechanism to control Congress`s reckless spending and borrowing by making every member of Congress immediately accountable to their State Governor and Legislature should Congress borrow to meet its expenses, which includes pork barrel expenditures financed by Congress`s borrowing!
The provision I refer to in our Constitution is Art. 1, Sec. 2, Cl. 3 which allows for an apportioned tax among the states, and was intended to be used if Congress fails to raise sufficient revenue from imposts, duties and miscellaneous excise taxes.
Our founding fathers intended that Congress should raise its revenue from imposts and duties [taxes at our water`s edge], and miscellaneous internal excise taxes on consumption, and, if insufficient revenue was raised from these sources to meet Congress`s expenditures, then Congress would lay a direct tax among the states to make up any shortfall.
To insure protection against the abuse of the direct taxing power, our founding fathers also provided a
fair share formula to be followed which determines each State`s share of the tax whenever Congress decides to call upon the people of the various States to fill the national treasury.
Considering subsequent amendments to our Constitution, that
fair share formula may be represented as follows:
State`s population
-------------------------------X SUM TO BE RAISED = STATE`S SHARE
Total U.S. Population
The theory of the founder`s fair share formula is based upon a conservative idea
Representation with proportional obligation, an idea which socialists and the friends of big government dread with a passion!
After determining each state`s share of the sum to be raised using the fair share formula, each state`s Congressional Delegation is to return to their own state with a bill for their state`s share of the tax and the various state Governors and Legislatures are to be left with the responsibility of transferring their state`s share from the state treasury into the treasury of the United States, or, raising additional taxes within the state and then transferring that money into the treasury of the United States. For documentation of this tax being practiced see:
Act laying a direct tax for $3 million August 2, 1813, and each state`s share of the tax. Also see:
Section 7 of direct tax of 1813[/b]allowing states to pay their respective quotas and be entitled to certain deductions.
Those who view themselves as being ``conservatives`` should ask themselves what would happen to the king of pork, the pride and joy of Pennsylvania, Representative John Murtha, if he should have to return home with a bill for his state Governor and Legislature to pay to finance the billions and billions of pork barrel earmarks he now channels to his district by plundering the federal treasury?
The point is, our founder`s plan provides a very real moment of accountability when Congress engages in reckless spending and borrowing, and yet, the only tax reform proposals being discussed by those the big media identifies as ``fiscal conservatives``, such as Newt Gingrich, Giuliani, Huckabee, Romney, etc., are tax plans which are void of any meaningful mechanisms designed to encourage Congress to follow sound fiscal policies!
In any event, it is difficult to imagine the Governor and Legislature of Pennsylvania being thrilled about having to deplete their state`s treasury to finance Murtha`s irresponsible pork barrel spending spree which he now engages in, when the bill for such spending will be immediately sent to Pennsylvania`s Governor and Legislature!
Regards,
JWK
(1)
The only ``conservative`` political group I know of which does in fact promote our Constitution`s original tax plan, and the ``state rate tax`` to extinguish deficits, is the
Constitution Party[/u]