Sat 29 Sep, 2007 06:31 pm - Advocate wrote:
[b][i]
John, would you define "direct taxes." [/i][/b]
Now why would you ask me that question when the same question was asked during the framing of our Constitution... (view)
Fri 28 Sep, 2007 04:51 pm - Advocate wrote:
[b][i]
John, would you admit that the USA is a plutocracy? Well, it is. The top 29 percent income earners make more than the bottom 96 million, and it is getting worse. You should... (view)
Fri 28 Sep, 2007 01:31 pm - [quote="OmSigDAVID"][quote="Advocate"]Are you aware of the following.
AMENDMENT XVI
Passed by Congress July 2, 1909. Ratified February 3, 1913.
Note: Article I, section... (view)
Fri 28 Sep, 2007 01:14 pm - john w k wrote:
[b][i]In regard to my being rude, you seem to forget you entered this thread with a ``rude`` misrepresentation of what I posted regarding Tiny and the Constitution Party. I... (view)
Thu 27 Sep, 2007 06:41 pm - nimh,
I`m really not interested in your philosophical ramblings on taxation, and especially not interested in them when they are not applicable in America`s federalist system under which there... (view)
Wed 26 Sep, 2007 10:09 pm - [b][i]the founding fathers provided a specific rule by which the various states are to contribute into the federal treasury in a general tax [..]. the issue was exhaustively debated during the... (view)
Wed 26 Sep, 2007 10:05 pm - Advocate wrote:
[b][i]``John, your link, Federal Employee Overview, is to a phony money-making commercial site, and contains a lot of crap. The figures given are false.
Your credibility is... (view)
Wed 26 Sep, 2007 03:06 pm - nimh wrote
[b][i]I think it's only normal that the wealthier people - and the wealthier states - contribute more finances to the overall good, but no, of course that does not mean that they... (view)
Tue 25 Sep, 2007 09:53 pm - Nimb wrote:
[b][i]I do not agree with your characterisation of the millions of state employees as "political plum job holders". While I'd gladly see the incomes of those at the... (view)
Tue 25 Sep, 2007 05:56 pm - Advocate wrote:
[b][i]John, I did say before that you are ignoring the 16th amendment, which is the law of the land. [/i][/b]
I am? How about explaining how I am ignoring the 16th Amendment?... (view)
