oralloy wrote:I challenge you to demonstrate how even one of my statements is nonsensical.
Thats not difficult oralloy. Here's a couple from recent posts
1. you said
oralloy wrote:The only experiment over uranium vs. plutonium devices was the Trinity test back in the US.
I said that was wrong. There was no uranium vs. plutonium test at Trinity. Trinity was a test of the implosion mechanism only. It was not a comparison test between the uranium and plutonium bombs. It was a test of the implosion method, to see if it worked or not. The actual experiment uranium vs. plutonium took place in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki respectively.
you said
oralloy wrote:The fact that the gun bomb was certain to work, and the implosion bomb was tested at Trinity, shows that I am not wrong.
Which is an admission that there was no comparison uranium vs. plutonium test at Trinity and demonstrates by your own words that you were in fact wrong to claim that there was.
2.
oralloy wrote:Better dead than red.
This is nonsense. That is it makes no sense. Exactly how is it better to be dead than red? You could not possibly devise an experiment to test your hypothesis. In any case, why do you hate the colour red so much that you would prefer to be dead? There is red I believe in the flag of the United States of America. Do you feel an urge to kill yourself everytime you gaze upon it? Why red and not any other colour?
If on the other hand you are referring to a political system under which you would not want to live, how can you possibly compare being dead i.e. a state of not living.... under say communism with not living under any other political system? Its a nonsense and you have therefore made at least two nonsensical statements in your recent posts.
Note I havent commented on your claimed omniscience re all matters pertaining to nuclear weapons.