The Army Times is not the New York Times, for general public consumption, I thought; it is a "house organ," I thought.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_organ
House organs don't "air dirty laundry"; they want their readership to think well of the house organ's sponsor.
In many corporations the house organ has articles about "employee achievements," etc. to make the reader feel good about his/her employer and therefore work more diligently, etc. For example, there wouldn't be an article about a system screw-up that would be frowned upon by customers.
Also, I would like to understand the poster's thoughts on deciding to post the article? Human interest? Personal feelings relating to the U.S. military? I think that too would be interesting?