thinks she likes her quickies and lots of air flow
0 Replies
Region Philbis
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:04 pm
she's cheeky...
0 Replies
Phoenix32890
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:09 pm
She ran out of the house in a hurry and forgot her pants???
0 Replies
Letty
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:12 pm
To tell you honestly, Mame. I get Britney and Paris confused. Perhaps it's because their names are so continental.
0 Replies
Mame
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:14 pm
And her sense of decency!
0 Replies
Mame
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:15 pm
Letty wrote:
To tell you honestly, Mame. I get Britney and Paris confused. Perhaps it's because their names are so continental.
No to mention they're both exhibitionists...
0 Replies
dagmaraka
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:18 pm
wig and a cellulite. hot.
0 Replies
husker
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:20 pm
it's not the same girl in both pics
0 Replies
Mame
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:23 pm
Who are they, then?
0 Replies
husker
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:25 pm
look at the details on the blouse/dress at the bottom of the garment - different, colors and tones are different - Hair, clothes, skin, while others are very close - ie boots
0 Replies
Mame
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:28 pm
Looks the same to me. Maybe just the lighting. The back of her dress is a little wrinkled from being sat on, that's all.
0 Replies
husker
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:30 pm
Sorry Mame - look at the bag and the boots those colors stay constant - hair, clothes, and skin tone is different while other things are constant.
0 Replies
DrewDad
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:41 pm
Nah. That's just lighting; one's indoors and one's outside. Or one's with flash and one's without.
0 Replies
DrewDad
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 12:45 pm
And what she's wearing is no worse than those cut-off jean shorts everyone wore a few years ago.
0 Replies
Noddy24
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 01:17 pm
Quote:
What's the use?
Sure, deck your limbs in pants,
Yours are the limbs, my sweeting.
You look divine as you advance . . .
Have you seen yourself retreating?
Ogden Nash
0 Replies
happycat
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 01:34 pm
That's her in both pics. The lighting is just different. You can see the blue polo-shirt guy in both pics and unfortunately, that's just the way she looks coming and going now.
She not that little teenager anymore. She's a woman that's had two kids in quick succession.
0 Replies
sozobe
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 02:07 pm
How very apropos, Noddy. Of course, there is a distinct lack of pants here, but the principle still applies.
Husker, it's the same. Here's another picture of her with both face and derriere, approximately as exposed (not quite):
0 Replies
Mame
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 02:16 pm
I thought she was at the beach until I scrolled down
0 Replies
Mame
1
Reply
Wed 29 Aug, 2007 02:21 pm
Let's face it, she likes exposing herself... this is gross, so don't look. Warning!