ebrown_p wrote:engineer wrote:
Both men seem to be taking the path of self interest instead of self reflection.
What would the path of self-reflection in each case entail? Would there be any thing either of these men could do to change your opinion of them?
In Vick's case, probably not. It's pretty hard to go from callously touturing and killing dogs to being a poster child for the SPCA. I suppose if he donated a significant portion of his wealth to some animal cause that would make a mark in my book. Not all his wealth, but enough to impact his lifestyle.
In Craig's case, it is very easy. He really hasn't done anything that can't be forgiven. People cheat on their spouses all the time. I don't think that's right, but it's not my business. Legally, this is a misdemeanor. This is not the Foley case where a congressman was using his position to approach children. Apologize to his family and the good folks of Idaho, clarify his political position going forward and move on. My problem with Craig is his attempt to deny responsibility rather than his sexual proclivities. As for his hypocrisy on gay rights, he has been consistent with the platform he ran on. The people of Idaho shouldn't say he misrepresented his politics in any way.