0
   

Bush's heartless Rx

 
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Sep, 2007 02:13 pm
McGentrix wrote:
candidone1 wrote:
okie wrote:
Ramafuchs, why don't you move to Venezuela or Cuba? After all, Castro and Chavez love you more and will give you more stuff.


Why is it that every time someone suggests that someone or some government does something better or more efficiently than the US, they are told they should move there. Are Americans that insecure in their country and their governement that they can't be told there is a better way?


Because, for the most part, they are only doing so to criticize the US. As an American, I like my country and get defensive when people criticize it. That is a foreign idea to some people, I understand that, but they just don't love their country as much I guess.


Exactly correct, McGentrix. Criticism of our system and suggestions of reforming it within the system we have is fine. Criticism of the entire system and suggestions we should scrap it are a totally different ballgame. I take offense with the idea that the likes of Castro or Chavez have any ideas that are better in regard to anything.

The point that should be remembered here is that a system that prevails and is better in the long run is the one we want. Simply giving a kid every dime he wants is a short term solution, but holding a kid accountable and making him work and pay his own way may seem harsh but in the long run makes a better citizen. We now have a large proportion of the citizenry that is clamoring for the government to do virtually anything and everything for them, and that is not how the U.S. became the great and prosperous country it is.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Sep, 2007 02:20 pm
McGentrix wrote:
au1929 wrote:
McGentrix

Love of ones country does not mean we must shut our eyes and be silent relative to what we perceive as it's shortcomings.


I didn't say it does. Perhaps those shouting the loudest of other's countries shortcomings should look to their own first?


Perhaps it's the fear of ending up in jail or worse yet dead that keeps them silent. Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
anton
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 06:29 am
Re: I stick to the main subject
Ramafuchs wrote:
Castro's Cuba is better than Germany, India, Israel, Australia in medical field.
I had never been to USA and I am well informed about the plight through my relatives.
Some Americans are tolerant to accept the critical views of the
NON -AMERICANS

I don't think you have been to Australia either, we have free health care system and seniors only pay a minimum price for medication, the price paid by seniors for medication is set at $5.00 per script.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 07:12 am
Re: I stick to the main subject
anton wrote:

I don't think you have been to Australia either, we have free health care system...


Since when?

There are several hundred WWW sites including those hosted by the Aussie government thay say otherwise.

"Government pays about 70% of healthcare costs (approximately 47% from the federal and 23% from state governments); the remainder is paid by non-government sources, e.g., insurance and private pay. The share of costs varies significantly across service types. Public hospitals, for example, are about 48% federal, 45% state, and the balance private sector funded. Medical services, on the other hand, are 82% federal funded with the balance paid mainly by the patient. Private health insurance (which covers about 8.6% net of health costs) receives a 30% subsidy from the federal government. Everyone is eligible for this subsidy. And 45% of the population has private health insurance; for a family, it costs between A$1,000 and A$2,000 per year (US$539 to US$1,078). People buy insurance directly from the insurance company (not via an employer). Insurance products are not risk-rated."

That doesn't sound like a "free" system to me...
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 08:11 am
McGentrix wrote:
I didn't say it does. Perhaps those shouting the loudest of other's countries shortcomings should look to their own first?


This was not the point up for discussion, although it is a sensible suggestion--but failure to examine one's own country first does not prevent someone from looking objectively at, or criticising another. For example, should Americans be prohibited from discussing poverty in other countries by virtue of the fact that there is poverty in theirs? Should there be a ban on conversations about freedom in other nations when things like the Patriot Act infringe on the very notion of freedom in America? Should government corruption or ethics be removed from the list of discussions because there is corruption at every level of government in the US? Seems silly don't you think? Everyone has the right to discuss the merits and deficiencies of other countries without theirs being called into question. After all, the people on these boards are not directly responsible for said deficiencies nor are they capable of singlehandedly cleaning up thier own proverbial backyard.

Okie claimed that if you see, or even discuss the merits and the benefits of some other country, you should move there. This assinine suggestion is what led me to ask if Americans had some sort of complex related to this issue since it is often one of the first responses we'll hear when praises are sung of another government or another system.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 08:27 am
McGentrix wrote:
candidone1 wrote:
okie wrote:
Ramafuchs, why don't you move to Venezuela or Cuba? After all, Castro and Chavez love you more and will give you more stuff.


Why is it that every time someone suggests that someone or some government does something better or more efficiently than the US, they are told they should move there. Are Americans that insecure in their country and their governement that they can't be told there is a better way?


Because, for the most part, they are only doing so to criticize the US. As an American, I like my country and get defensive when people criticize it. That is a foreign idea to some people, I understand that, but they just don't love their country as much I guess.


I like my country as well as you do, and get defensive when our leaders and people like you try to tell me how I need to act and what I have to believe. Up yours, all of you. This is the land of the free,not the land of the free if you agree with me and otherwise you support my enemies, especially my trumped up enemies. Go back to your Sgt. Fury comics why not?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 08:48 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
candidone1 wrote:
okie wrote:
Ramafuchs, why don't you move to Venezuela or Cuba? After all, Castro and Chavez love you more and will give you more stuff.


Why is it that every time someone suggests that someone or some government does something better or more efficiently than the US, they are told they should move there. Are Americans that insecure in their country and their governement that they can't be told there is a better way?


Because, for the most part, they are only doing so to criticize the US. As an American, I like my country and get defensive when people criticize it. That is a foreign idea to some people, I understand that, but they just don't love their country as much I guess.


I like my country as well as you do, and get defensive when our leaders and people like you try to tell me how I need to act and what I have to believe. Up yours, all of you. This is the land of the free,not the land of the free if you agree with me and otherwise you support my enemies, especially my trumped up enemies. Go back to your Sgt. Fury comics why not?


I have never told you how to act, I have merely criticisized your positions. This is a free country, as you say, and you are allowed to behave as you wish.

You say that you don't need people to tell you how to behave and what you have to believe, yet I have never once seen you step up against the liberal agenda to force health care down your throat. They preach to you about global warming as though it is a new religion. They tell you that you should limit how much money you should make. They tell you how much money you should give to others....

Yet, it's people like me you blame...
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 08:54 am
I'd rather have things that will improve my quality of life shoved down my throat...like health care.... but you instead want to shove supporting a murderous and useless genocide that squaders the lives of our children down mine.... to each his own (almost) G.I. Joe
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 12:35 pm
I can consume
Sir

"Everyone has the right to discuss the merits and deficiencies of other countries without theirs being called into question. After all, the people on these boards are not directly responsible for said deficiencies nor are they capable of singlehandedly cleaning up thier own proverbial backyard.

Okie claimed that if you see, or even discuss the merits and the benefits of some other country, you should move there. This assinine suggestion is what led me to ask if Americans had some sort of complex related to this issue since it is often one of the first responses we'll hear when praises are sung of another government or another system.





this is the one that arrest my attention
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 02:06 pm
Re: I can consume
Ramafuchs wrote:

Okie claimed that if you see, or even discuss the merits and the benefits of some other country, you should move there. This assinine suggestion is what led me to ask if Americans had some sort of complex related to this issue since it is often one of the first responses we'll hear when praises are sung of another government or another system.


Suggesting someone move to Cuba or Venezuela is an effort to show that person how absurd some of their claims actually are. And if they really do think somewhere else is better, don't you think it would be easier to move somewhere else than trying to force their own particular viewpoints onto every other citizen, many of which don't share their viewpoint.

If people are praising communist or very socialist systems, that is not what America is base on and traditionally has never been. So I think it a bit radical for people to want to turn the country I love into something it has never been. Freedom and responsibility is what got us to where we are, not a nanny state. We need to talk more about the responsibility of people to do things for themselves, not what more government can give everyone. If people wish to drive new cars instead of buying health insurance, then they shouldn't want the rest of us to pay for it.
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 02:37 pm
Re: I can consume
okie wrote:
Ramafuchs wrote:

Okie claimed that if you see, or even discuss the merits and the benefits of some other country, you should move there. This assinine suggestion is what led me to ask if Americans had some sort of complex related to this issue since it is often one of the first responses we'll hear when praises are sung of another government or another system.


First off, Ramfuchs did not say this...I did.

okie wrote:
Suggesting someone move to Cuba or Venezuela is an effort to show that person how absurd some of their claims actually are. And if they really do think somewhere else is better, don't you think it would be easier to move somewhere else than trying to force their own particular viewpoints onto every other citizen, many of which don't share their viewpoint.


No, the absurdity lies in the suggestion that because an individual finds one or 2 virtues in some other system, they should then uproot and move there.

I like my friend's fireplace. It has nicer stonework and is more efficient than my own. I can appreciate it, and possibly hope to have one like his one day....but it's absurd to suggest that I move there. His grass is patchy, basement cold and wife is a bitch.
But it's his fireplace I like because it actually is better than mine--and it's absurd to suggest that I move there because of this one thing.

In addition, I don't know why you wingnuts have become so afraid of having something "shoved down your throat". Merely pointing to a the merits of another way of doing things, that may in fact be superior, has and never will become an act of "shoving x or y down one's throat."

okie wrote:
If people are praising communist or very socialist systems, that is not what America is base on and traditionally has never been. So I think it a bit radical for people to want to turn the country I love into something it has never been. Freedom and responsibility is what got us to where we are, not a nanny state. We need to talk more about the responsibility of people to do things for themselves, not what more government can give everyone. If people wish to drive new cars instead of buying health insurance, then they shouldn't want the rest of us to pay for it.


It has never been a discussion solely on the merits of socialist or communist policy. Throughout these fora, people have openly discussed the merits of policies in Canada, Germany, Australia etc....not stricly praising communist or socialist systems.
You conservatives love to parrot the term "nanny state" as if that has any meaning, or as if having oneself taken care of is a bad thing....you claim that every American needs to know responsibility and accountibility and preach the virtues of independence and advocate less government.

Why hold these values over your own countrymen while at the same time advocating the emancipation of foreigners from tyrannical rule. You are willing to spend billions to free the Iraqi people from the Hussein regime, yet staunchly and coldly tell fellow Americans to "do things themselves".
As you can see with the Iraq situation, some people can't do some of the things they need done on their own. They need help. Merely repeating in one's own mind that the poor and downtrodden are victims of their own lack of initiative does not make it true.


Such an incoherent and selective mind is the conservative.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 02:39 pm
America has always moved forward and progressed by taking in the best ideas we can from other countries around the world. Hell, there is no political idea or invention which really began in America. Only ones we've co-opted, and then done really well with.

To say that it's anti-American to think that we could learn something from other people's way of doing things is an indication that one doesn't have any clue about the history of America -- or its' future.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 08:13 pm
I am not opposed to tweaking the system to make it better. Conservatives have proposed reforms to medical care that have been stonewalled by Democrats, so the suggestion that conservatives are for the status quo and against improvements is patently wrong. Conservatives and liberals just disagree on what they view as improvements. I think we need more market forces, freedom, and personal responsibility and control injected into medical care, not less. That is basically the disagreement in a nutshell.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Sep, 2007 03:04 am
Re: I can consume
okie wrote:
And if they really do think somewhere else is better, don't you think it would be easier to move somewhere else than trying to force their own particular viewpoints onto every other citizen, many of which don't share their viewpoint.



Can I use your argument the next time we discuss illegal immigration, and reasons why people would rather leave their countries than stay and force their particular viewpoints onto their fellow citizens?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Sep, 2007 07:58 am
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Health insurance jumps 6% this year

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Wednesday, September 12th 2007, 4:00 AM


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Health insurance premiums paid by workers and their employers rose an average of 6.1% this year, outpacing inflation and pay increases and taking a bigger chunk out of families' budgets.

Premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance for the average family topped $12,000 - with employees picking up about one-fourth of that cost, a new study showed.

Many of the more than 3,000 companies surveyed by the Kaiser Family Foundation, a health care research organization that annually tracks the cost of health insurance, said they planned to make significant changes to their health plans and benefits. Nearly half said they were likely to raise premiums.

This year, premiums reached an average of $12,106 for a family of four, with workers paying, on average, $3,281 of that. Premiums to cover a single person cost $4,479, with employees paying $694. The portions both families and single people pay in premiums has nearly doubled since 2001.

The 6.1% increase of premiums for families was the lowest growth rate since 1999, but it doesn't mean much when it outpaces wages, which rose an average of 3.7%, and inflation, which went up 2.6%. Since 2001, the cost of premiums has gone up 78%, far outpacing a 19% increase in wages and 17% jump in inflation.


If this trend continues and it surely will. The only the rich and government workers,city, state and federal will be covered by medical insurance.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 07:53 am
N.J.'s Corzine to Defy New Health-Care Rules
Fight Grows Over Changes in Children's Program

By Christopher Lee
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 14, 2007; Page A04


Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine informed President Bush this week that New Jersey will not obey federal rules that would make it harder to enroll middle-income kids for a popular government-subsidized health insurance program.

His move escalated the growing confrontation between a number of states and the administration over the new rules imposed on the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). They have been criticized as unfair and overreaching by children's advocates and politicians of both parties, but Corzine's declaration marks the first time a governor has openly vowed to defy them.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/13/AR2007091302139.html?wpisrc=newsletter
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 10:42 am
It'll be fun to watch him cry like a baby when NJ looses their federal funding over it.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 01:40 pm
I am sure the rat bastard in the white house will have a good laugh.

Think about it some tyrants and murderers get hung while others walk away with a pension.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Sep, 2007 08:50 am
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Sep, 2007 09:53 pm
au1929 wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Health insurance jumps 6% this year

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Wednesday, September 12th 2007, 4:00 AM


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Health insurance premiums paid by workers and their employers rose an average of 6.1% this year, outpacing inflation and pay increases and taking a bigger chunk out of families' budgets.

Premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance for the average family topped $12,000 - with employees picking up about one-fourth of that cost, a new study showed.

Many of the more than 3,000 companies surveyed by the Kaiser Family Foundation, a health care research organization that annually tracks the cost of health insurance, said they planned to make significant changes to their health plans and benefits. Nearly half said they were likely to raise premiums.

This year, premiums reached an average of $12,106 for a family of four, with workers paying, on average, $3,281 of that. Premiums to cover a single person cost $4,479, with employees paying $694. The portions both families and single people pay in premiums has nearly doubled since 2001.

The 6.1% increase of premiums for families was the lowest growth rate since 1999, but it doesn't mean much when it outpaces wages, which rose an average of 3.7%, and inflation, which went up 2.6%. Since 2001, the cost of premiums has gone up 78%, far outpacing a 19% increase in wages and 17% jump in inflation.


If this trend continues and it surely will. The only the rich and government workers,city, state and federal will be covered by medical insurance.


Jan 2008, health insurance premiums increase
increase 10-15% in Massachusetts. Generic meds are now increasing in price 10% every 3-4 months.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 01/07/2025 at 05:55:29