Finn dAbuzz wrote:kuvasz wrote:Finn dAbuzz wrote:CoastalRat wrote:Or maybe Republicans have better things to do than to scour local news sources looking for democrats who have been caught. In a quick glance, most of the names on the list are local politicians/officeholders. Someone seems to have way too much time on their hands if they think putting this list together really proves anything at all. I for one have no desire to spend time doing so. I don't know whether repubs or dems assualt children in greater numbers, and frankly I don't care. As long as they are put away where they cannot do it again, I am happy.
I think the belief that one party is predisposed to molesting kids is a bunch of crock. But then that is my opinion.
Here here!
well i'm glad you agree, but it might have been a more forceful comment coming from someone whose day-job did not include working with ballon animals.
Will you ever run out of silly insults?
Why, considering the statement with which you agreed was made by an actual clown? (See below) Or are you so concerned about your own appearance around here that you think others think of you that way at the slightest reference?
Oh, now I see that your silly insult was partially directed at Coastal. OK, but the question still stands.
Actually, it isn't the fact that these perverts are republican,
Oh no, not at all.
(but it is fun to needle your insufferable asses for supporting such perverts considering your sanctimonious attitudes towards those different or less fortunate)
What an utter crock. First of all we "asses" can hardly be so insufferable since you keeping coming back to our posts like a moth to a flame.
Its true, I do enjoy tormenting the helpless, kinda' like Bugs Bunny with Daffy Duck.
You Bugs? Please, you desperate maroon.
Secondly, who is supporting perverts? What conservative in this forum has supported a known and proven pervert? (I know, I know, you're capable of a childish assertion that George Bush is somehow a pervert, but try, for once, to rise above your cheap tricks).
(Actually, The Flame is a pretty good Cheap Trick tune.)
But come now Finny, your own words support the GOP in its war on America. Just like Romney's five sons support the American war in Iraq by supporting their dad's campaign; support comes in many ways, at least that's what I hear from the gutless draft-age wonderboys on the Right who support the troops but would never sign up, or do you disagree, that you don't have to write a check to help a pervert get elected?
Or is Romney wrong along with most wingnuts?
What a dodge, or are you actually asserting that Romney is a pervert?
How convenient that your definition of perversion has shed it's sexual connotations for those more political.
And the GOP War on America? Do you really believe such shite? (Need I ask?)
Finally, what is this sanctimonious attitude towards the different and less fortunate? At best this is a strange choice of words, but more likely simply clumsy usage.
Um, that would be . Like well what Jesus preached? You know, Jesus? George Bush's fave philosopher? The poor, the young, the uneducated, the sick and socially outcast. (You know, folks "different" from you and "less fortunate?").
So actually it was quite an efficient use of word and rhetoric, but you know what the good Lord said; pearls before swine.
Sure. Consult your tenth grade vocabulary book Kuvy.
You can't merely wave a wand and say "ippity bippity boo, it's the free market for you," as the default solution for their problems, especially when it is not working too well.
but that they espouse political dogma that attacks their own behavior in public while doing it in private; that's the hypocrisy... and your sore spot, you just can't suffer being made fools of in public by your political fellow travelers.
Sort of like liberal Climate Change mavens who jet from rally to rally in their private planes? Or populist former NC senators who decry the rich elite while building themselves a 20,000 sf manor house?
You really ought to calm down, focus, and stick to your intended reply and not confuse yourself by trying to think too fast, you are acting, well, "Daffy" again.
You see, your method of "sort of liking" comparison is a bit too liberal, so let me try to help. You're attempting to make a moral comparison between the public acts of sexual deviance of your political allies with the personal calls for national energy efficiency or domicile floor plan selection of mine.
That is your moral comparison?
And you wonder why people laugh at your judgment around here?
Public acts of deviance like Romney's support for the war? You're giving me whiplash with your fast switching perspective.
Face it Kuvy, the thrust (ooh, is that perverted?) of your argument is hypocrisy, not sexual deviance, and you have a heroic tolerance for hypocrisy on the Left, but switch back if it helps you form a retort.
Finally, if anyone in this forum laughs at my judgments, so be it. Do you really think I care? Apparently you do though if you think that this jibe might strike home.
btw another, and not merely a "local" pol either, again, a man with a national slot in the Republican Party political structure. and good God finally not a homo- or pedo- assault this time, just plain old man on woman rape.
http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2007/07/michigan_young_republican_plea.html
Quote:The former head of the Michigan Federation of Young Republicans admitted today that he sexually abused a colleague during a national convention here last summer.
Michael Flory, a 32-year-old attorney from Jackson, Mich., pleaded guilty to sexual battery on the day he was to stand trial for rape.
The teary-eyed college student he overpowered in a downtown hotel room gasped and dabbed her eyes as Flory replied to Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge Peter Corrigan's question, "Are you indeed guilty?"
"Sure - yeah," Flory said.
Corrigan set sentencing for Sept. 13. Flory faces a sentence that ranges from probation to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
The plea bargain, she said, doesn't include any suggestion of leniency, and the state will seek incarceration. She also said she hopes to present evidence of several "other incidents of sexual misconduct" in which Flory took advantage of vulnerable young women.
The victim, who is 22, declined to speak after Flory's guilty plea.
She and some supporters lamented when the incident became public last winter that Flory and his followers within the Republican organization had been smearing her reputation in retaliation for accusing Flory of rape. Skutnik said she found that to be true.
"People were using every opportunity to try to trash her, on Web sites or whatever," the prosecutor said. "He's been running around telling everybody what a piece of trash she is, so she was very happy to see him plead guilty."
The defense can say little until sentencing, Hilow said.
"He would just like to put this in the past for everybody," the defense attorney said.
Flory gained some notoriety at age 18 when he gave a televised speech to the Republican National Convention in the Houston Astrodome in 1992. The Michigan Young Republicans' Web site once hailed him as "one of the rising stars of GOP politics in America" and declared that "Mike has earned a great name for himself."
Flory, the victim and other members of Michigan's delegation to the national Young Republicans convention were partying in the Warehouse District last July 6, police and prosecutors said. The victim became so intoxicated that she headed back to her hotel room. Flory escorted her.
But when she lay down to sleep, he "violently forced several sex acts upon her," Skutnik said.
It's hard to keep track of these Young Republican leaders without a police lineup.
According to your claims, A2K conservatives will now flock to the defense of Mr Flory.
Sometimes, as I click through your posts and find myself draining another beer so I can use the empty bottle to slam myself upside my head,
Not hard enough unfortunately
I wonder if there might be a better use for my free time. But that would be missing the point.
Reading your right-wing lunacy, much like following baseball or bird-watching, rewards the patient. If you sit there long enough, you might see something you've never seen before
And so again, pray tell, from what fetid crevice in your dank and dirty mind did you pull that accusation? What "claims? did I post refering to [quote]A2K conservatives will now flock to the defense of Mr Flory.
"
Please show me any remark I made that said what you said I said? Not that I implied in your sick and twisted mind, but straight, a direct quote, a correspondence with the truth.
Seems you've been doing some more of that bizarre Right-Wing blame-shifting and self-justification that we love so well.
And you are a bold faced liar to boot.[/color]
"(but it is fun to needle your insufferable asses for supporting such perverts considering your sanctimonious attitudes towards those different or less fortunate)"
I guess you meant me not us.
Are you really suggesting that if someone was willing to take the time to do the research that they could not come up with a Democrat pervert for every Republican pervert you can trot out? Are you really trying to suggest that there are disproportionately more perverts among Republicans than Democrats?
Sweet Jesus, you may not believe I'm truly offering you any assistance but a clever person usually reads what their adversary writes before responding to it. I went over this before.
So in your mind you think that me remarking
[quote] Actually, it isn't the fact that these perverts are republican,
suggests that Republicans are more perverted than Democrats?
Actually your own remark just illustrates that Republicans like you are willing to pervert facts and the truth for personal attacks.[/color]
I doubt even you would make that claim, but you do make quite a bit out of the hypocrisy implied by Republican perverts.
Um... in case you just forgot, you just suggested above, that I did, without support.
So what are we to think of Democrat perverts?
Vote for them all the time, damned proud of it, better to have them running around the District than wanderings round the neighborhood molesting the livestock.
At least they are not hypocrites because Democrats are all for tolerating, if not embracing perversion.
Hey, when falling, tuck & dive
What that?some kind of pedophile code word.
No thanks buddy i'm way to old for you.
Hay Limbaugh! Take an Oxycontin and relax. I'm not the one trying to suck the pants off a boyscout.
Amigo wrote:What that?some kind of pedophile code word.
No thanks buddy i'm way to old for you.
You idiotic dolt.
"Kuvy" is "kuvasz," a long time poster in this forum. If you read any of the previous postings you would have known this and possibly not made the idiotic posting to which I now respond.
Let me spell it out for you:
Your post was so idiotic that I was challenging kuvy to defend it as it, ostensibly, coincided with his own take on things.
did that
You utter, idioctic dolt.
Thanks for so clearly revealing yourself.
