kuvasz wrote:Finn dAbuzz wrote:CoastalRat wrote:Or maybe Republicans have better things to do than to scour local news sources looking for democrats who have been caught. In a quick glance, most of the names on the list are local politicians/officeholders. Someone seems to have way too much time on their hands if they think putting this list together really proves anything at all. I for one have no desire to spend time doing so. I don't know whether repubs or dems assualt children in greater numbers, and frankly I don't care. As long as they are put away where they cannot do it again, I am happy.
I think the belief that one party is predisposed to molesting kids is a bunch of crock. But then that is my opinion.
Here here!
well i'm glad you agree, but it might have been a more forceful comment coming from someone whose day-job did not include working with ballon animals.
Will you ever run out of silly insults?
Why, considering the statement with which you agreed was made by an actual clown? (See below) Or are you so concerned about your own appearance around here that you think others think of you that way at the slightest reference?
Actually, it isn't the fact that these perverts are republican,
Oh no, not at all.
(but it is fun to needle your insufferable asses for supporting such perverts considering your sanctimonious attitudes towards those different or less fortunate)
What an utter crock. First of all we "asses" can hardly be so insufferable since you keeping coming back to our posts like a moth to a flame.
Its true, I do enjoy tormenting the helpless, kinda' like Bugs Bunny with Daffy Duck.
Secondly, who is supporting perverts? What conservative in this forum has supported a known and proven pervert? (I know, I know, you're capable of a childish assertion that George Bush is somehow a pervert, but try, for once, to rise above your cheap tricks).
(Actually, The Flame is a pretty good Cheap Trick tune.)
But come now Finny, your own words support the GOP in its war on America. Just like Romney's five sons support the American war in Iraq by supporting their dad's campaign; support comes in many ways, at least that's what I hear from the gutless draft-age wonderboys on the Right who support the troops but would never sign up, or do you disagree, that you don't have to write a check to help a pervert get elected?
Or is Romney wrong along with most wingnuts?
Finally, what is this sanctimonious attitude towards the different and less fortunate? At best this is a strange choice of words, but more likely simply clumsy usage.
Um, that would be . Like well what Jesus preached? You know, Jesus? George Bush's fave philosopher? The poor, the young, the uneducated, the sick and socially outcast. (You know, folks "different" from you and "less fortunate?").
So actually it was quite an efficient use of word and rhetoric, but you know what the good Lord said; pearls before swine.
You can't merely wave a wand and say "ippity bippity boo, it's the free market for you," as the default solution for their problems, especially when it is not working too well.
but that they espouse political dogma that attacks their own behavior in public while doing it in private; that's the hypocrisy... and your sore spot, you just can't suffer being made fools of in public by your political fellow travelers.
Sort of like liberal Climate Change mavens who jet from rally to rally in their private planes? Or populist former NC senators who decry the rich elite while building themselves a 20,000 sf manor house?
You really ought to calm down, focus, and stick to your intended reply and not confuse yourself by trying to think too fast, you are acting, well, "Daffy" again.
You see, your method of "sort of liking" comparison is a bit too liberal, so let me try to help. You're attempting to make a moral comparison between the public acts of sexual deviance of your political allies with the personal calls for national energy efficiency or domicile floor plan selection of mine.
That is your moral comparison?
And you wonder why people laugh at your judgment around here?
btw another, and not merely a "local" pol either, again, a man with a national slot in the Republican Party political structure. and good God finally not a homo- or pedo- assault this time, just plain old man on woman rape.
http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2007/07/michigan_young_republican_plea.html
Quote:The former head of the Michigan Federation of Young Republicans admitted today that he sexually abused a colleague during a national convention here last summer.
Michael Flory, a 32-year-old attorney from Jackson, Mich., pleaded guilty to sexual battery on the day he was to stand trial for rape.
The teary-eyed college student he overpowered in a downtown hotel room gasped and dabbed her eyes as Flory replied to Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge Peter Corrigan's question, "Are you indeed guilty?"
"Sure - yeah," Flory said.
Corrigan set sentencing for Sept. 13. Flory faces a sentence that ranges from probation to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
The plea bargain, she said, doesn't include any suggestion of leniency, and the state will seek incarceration. She also said she hopes to present evidence of several "other incidents of sexual misconduct" in which Flory took advantage of vulnerable young women.
The victim, who is 22, declined to speak after Flory's guilty plea.
She and some supporters lamented when the incident became public last winter that Flory and his followers within the Republican organization had been smearing her reputation in retaliation for accusing Flory of rape. Skutnik said she found that to be true.
"People were using every opportunity to try to trash her, on Web sites or whatever," the prosecutor said. "He's been running around telling everybody what a piece of trash she is, so she was very happy to see him plead guilty."
The defense can say little until sentencing, Hilow said.
"He would just like to put this in the past for everybody," the defense attorney said.
Flory gained some notoriety at age 18 when he gave a televised speech to the Republican National Convention in the Houston Astrodome in 1992. The Michigan Young Republicans' Web site once hailed him as "one of the rising stars of GOP politics in America" and declared that "Mike has earned a great name for himself."
Flory, the victim and other members of Michigan's delegation to the national Young Republicans convention were partying in the Warehouse District last July 6, police and prosecutors said. The victim became so intoxicated that she headed back to her hotel room. Flory escorted her.
But when she lay down to sleep, he "violently forced several sex acts upon her," Skutnik said.
It's hard to keep track of these Young Republican leaders without a police lineup.
According to your claims, A2K conservatives will now flock to the defense of Mr Flory.
Sometimes, as I click through your posts and find myself draining another beer so I can use the empty bottle to slam myself upside my head, I wonder if there might be a better use for my free time. But that would be missing the point.
Reading your right-wing lunacy, much like following baseball or bird-watching, rewards the patient. If you sit there long enough, you might see something you've never seen before
And so again, pray tell, from what fetid crevice in your dank and dirty mind did you pull that accusation? What "claims? did I post refering to [quote]A2K conservatives will now flock to the defense of Mr Flory.
"
Please show me any remark I made that said what you said I said? Not that I implied in your sick and twisted mind, but straight, a direct quote, a correspondence with the truth.
Seems you've been doing some more of that bizarre Right-Wing blame-shifting and self-justification that we love so well.
And you are a bold faced liar to boot.[/color]
Are you really suggesting that if someone was willing to take the time to do the research that they could not come up with a Democrat pervert for every Republican pervert you can trot out? Are you really trying to suggest that there are disproportionately more perverts among Republicans than Democrats?
Sweet Jesus, you may not believe I'm truly offering you any assistance but a clever person usually reads what their adversary writes before responding to it. I went over this before.
So in your mind you think that me remarking
[quote] Actually, it isn't the fact that these perverts are republican,
It's very sad not to see too many people condemning these filthy republicans. It makes me wonder sometimes, if this is the norm or acceptable attitudes in America and here on AK2.
