1
   

How do we know that Christians are Delusional?

 
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Jul, 2007 07:11 pm
IFeelFree wrote:
echi wrote:
IFF wrote:
I've been using language to express as best I can what can only be known by direct experience.

Yes, because language cannot express the in-expressible.

True. At best, words are a pointer to the inexpressible.

Words represent concepts.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 05:50 am
IFeelFree wrote:
Setanta wrote:
It continues to be a false analogy to compare your touchy-feely reports about the significance of your experiences in meditation to the issues of a scientific study of the physics of the cosmos.

The only way to transcend the limitations of scientific reductionism is to realize a more holistic understanding of the universe through the transformation of consciousness.


Once again, you have absolutely no basis other than a personal preference for alleging that consciousness functions as you claim it does, and that there is any spiritual dimension.

And you completely dodge the burden of the remark, which is that you are making a false analogy to compare your spiritual dog and pony show to scientific theory. You are the one who is comparing these things, not me, so don't feed me some "holistic understanding" horseshit about your personal religious preferences.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 08:00 am
IFeelFree wrote:
. . . As to your objection that I characterize pure consciousness as not being an object, that is precisely the point. Only when there is consciousness without an object, i.e., awareness without thought, can consciousness become aware of its own nature -- unbounded, formless, unchanging, unconditioned, timeless.
So the conscious mind has a mind of its own which, in turn, has a . . .
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 10:01 am
neologist wrote:
IFeelFree wrote:
. . . As to your objection that I characterize pure consciousness as not being an object, that is precisely the point. Only when there is consciousness without an object, i.e., awareness without thought, can consciousness become aware of its own nature -- unbounded, formless, unchanging, unconditioned, timeless.
So the conscious mind has a mind of its own which, in turn, has a . . .

... magical spirit guide.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 11:09 am
rosborne979 wrote:
neologist wrote:
IFeelFree wrote:
. . . As to your objection that I characterize pure consciousness as not being an object, that is precisely the point. Only when there is consciousness without an object, i.e., awareness without thought, can consciousness become aware of its own nature -- unbounded, formless, unchanging, unconditioned, timeless.
So the conscious mind has a mind of its own which, in turn, has a . . .

... magical spirit guide.
. . . floating through the etheric matrix . . .
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 05:49 pm
of pure consciousness
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 07:37 pm
. . . to a higher astral plane. . .
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 08:34 pm
... where if it's very lucky, it will get to meet his radiant eminence, IFeelFree ...
0 Replies
 
Pauligirl
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 08:47 pm
and they shall dance together on the head of a pin....
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 09:43 pm
. . . into the spherical abyss . . .
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 09:54 pm
Those with religous belief truly believe there is a god no matter that all available "evidence" tells us to the contrary, and there is no evidence to support their belief.

Humans are hard-wired to believe in some kind of god, but I don't have the answer why. Looking at human history, no matter which country or culture, they all seem to have believed in some god or many gods.

The bible has too many errors, contradictions and omissions to be a product directed by any god.

It will always remain a human mystery.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 10:15 pm
Quote:

Delusion: A fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact."


That's a pretty good description of the theory of evolution when you get down to it.

Other than that, Joseph Smith for sure was a BS artist, but Christ was absolutely not. Several hundred people claimed to have seen Christ after he died and the apostles all went to their deaths rather than deny what they had seen. People don't willingly die en mass for lies.

Unlike Muhammed, Joseph Smith, Budha, or any other religious leader, Christ's mission was in this world and with people. You don't read about him holing out in a cave until he started to hallucinate or flying off to heaven on a magic carpet or "attaining enlightenment" living out in the woods. He was teaching morality and what the spirit world expects from us in the way of behavior.

Also unlike any other religious leader, Jesus spoke of the spirit world as one with authority and it was this trait which apostles claimed that people found totally amazing and different.

The miracles you read about in the bible are all spiritual (paranormal or what Jaynes refers to as 'bicameral') phenomena for which rational explanations exist, and there are only about fifty or a hundred of them.

Secular humanism and evolution require countless billions of probabilistic miracles and zero probability events, every single one of which is an outright violation of probabilistic and mathematical laws, which are very real.

Moreover, the entire thing with Islam is ultimately going to come to some sort of a point at which every person on this planet is going to have to make a personal choice and pick a side and, when that day comes, "secular humanism" which the turkey who wrote that video advocates, is not going to be a viable side.
0 Replies
 
Pauligirl
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 10:50 pm
gungasnake wrote:
Quote:

People don't willingly die en mass for lies.



Sure they do. They just don't know it's a lie.


March 17, 2000, between 780 and 1000 members of the Movement for the Restoration of the Ten Commandments of God died in a probable mass suicide in Uganda. The group had splintered from Roman Catholicism to emphasize apocalypticism and alleged Marian apparitions. They also deemed the wider world to be corrupt, seeing themselves as a Noah's Ark of purity. Along these ends members severely restricted their speech to avoid saying anything dishonest or sinful. Curiously, the group had a feast that involved large quantities of Coca-Cola and beef before dying.

Heaven's Gate
On March 26, 1997, 39 followers of the Heaven's Gate cult died in a mass suicide near San Diego, California. In the beliefs of the cult, this was not an act of self-extermination; they believed that they were merely "exiting their human vehicles" so that their souls could go on a journey aboard a spaceship they believed to be following comet Hale-Bopp. Some male members of the cult underwent voluntary castration in preparation for the genderless life they believed awaited them after the suicide. The victims were self-drugged and then suffocated by other members in a series of suicides over a period of three days. Thirty-nine died, most were in their 40's and came from a wide range of backgrounds.

March 23, 1997 -- The charred bodies of three women and two men were found inside a house in Saint Casimir, Quebec. All were members of the Solar Temple, an international sect that believes ritualized suicide leads to rebirth on a planet called Sirius.

December 1995 -- Sixteen Solar Temple members were found dead in a burned house outside Grenoble, in the French Alps.
October 1994 -- The burned bodies of 48 Solar Temple members were discovered in a farmhouse and three chalets in Switzerland. At the same time, five bodies, including that of an infant, were found in a chalet north of Montreal.

April 19, 1993 -- At least 70 Branch Davidian cult members died after fire and a shootout with police and federal agents ended a 51-day siege of the compound near Waco, Texas. The sect's leader, David Koresh, who had preached a messianic gospel of sex, freedom and revolution and told followers he was Jesus Christ, died of a gunshot wound to the head sometime during the blaze.

October 1993 -- Fifty-three hill Vietnamese tribe villagers committed mass suicide with flintlock guns and other primitive weapons in the belief they would go straight to heaven. Officials said they were the victims of a scam by a man who received cash donations for promising a speedy road to paradise.

December 1991 -- Mexican minister Ramon Morales Almazan and 29 followers suffocated after he told them to keep praying and ignore toxic fumes filling their church.

December 13, 1990 -- Twelve people died in a religious ritual in Tijuana, Mexico, apparently after drinking fruit punch tainted by industrial alcohol.

November 18, 1978 -- The Rev. Jim Jones led more than 900 followers to their deaths at Jonestown, Guyana, by drinking a cyanide-laced grape punch. Cult members who refused to swallow the liquid were shot.

from CNN and around the web

Also:

http://www.geocities.com/paulntobin/apologetics.html#q1

All the apostles died for their beliefs. Why would anyone risk his life for a belief they know to be a lie?
There are three assumptions embedded in this question: all of them demonstrably false.
The first assumption is that we know all the apostles died martyrs' deaths. This is simply not the case. With the exception of the death of James the son of Zebedee (Acts 12:2) and Judas (Matthew 27:9, Acts 1:18), no other apostolic deaths is recounted in the New Testament. The traditional material relating to the life of the apostles are simply unreliable. Apart from the (probably) historical tradition that Peter died in Rome, we do not know how the rest of the apostles met their end -whether it was through martyrdom, disease, accident or old age.
The second assumption is that what the apostles believed about Jesus is the same essentially as what can be found in the New Testament. It must be remembered that since the stories in the gospels were not written by the apostles or any of their close associates [see Q9 above] - it is unlikely that what is described therein as the teachings of Jesus actually were what the Jewish preacher taught.
We do know that the teachings in the New Testament tend (although not always!) to be in line with what was taught by the self-proclaimed apostle Paul. Yet we have strong evidence that Paul's teachings were opposed by the apostles who knew Jesus, that he had a falling out with them at Antioch and that his last trip to Jerusalem to reconcile himself with them very probably ended in failure.
All available evidence points to the conclusion James, the brother of Jesus, became the leader of the apostles and the Jerusalem church after Jesus died. James was a devout Jew. Like James, the original apostles and the Jerusalem church remained firmly within the fold of Judaism. The group fled to Pella in the Transjordan before the outbreak of the Jewish war. Their later descendents consisted of groups known as Jewish Christians (i.e. the Nazarenes and Ebionites), who had no belief in the virgin birth and disavowed the divinity of Jesus - considering him a great prophet in the mold of Moses.
Thus even if it can be shown that some of the apostles died martyrs' deaths, it is unlikely in the extreme that they died for the same beliefs or dogmas of modern fundamentalist/evangelical Christianity.
The third assumption is that people will not die for false beliefs or beliefs they know to be false. This is clearly a false assumption. All religions have their martyrs. Even some non-religious political systems - such as communism - have found people willing too die for them. The current trend among Islamic militants of suicide bombing is just another sad example of people only to willing to end their lives for their [unexamined] beliefs. The last decade of the twentieth century have given us plenty of other examples. David Koresh led his Branch Davidians to fiery deaths in their final apocalyptic battle with the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. Luc Jouret and his followers of the Solar Temple group committed suicide in Switzerland and Canada in 1994. Marshall Herff Applewhite and his followers, members of the Heaven's Gate community, willingly committed suicide believing that they were to be picked up by aliens.
In other words being willing to die for one's beliefs has always been the hallmark of fanatics and true believers. The willingness of these believers to die martyr's deaths provides no assurance whatsoever that what they believe is true.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 03:52 am
Pauligirl wrote:
gungasnake wrote:
Quote:

People don't willingly die en mass for lies.



Sure they do. They just don't know it's a lie..


The apostles would have known it if it was a lie.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 04:43 am
What about killing en masse for a lie?
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 04:51 am
neologist wrote:
What about killing en masse for a lie?


Jesus never told anybody to do that; Muhammed DID. Pretty simple choice if you ask me.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 05:08 am
Oh, yeah, probably ought to mention, the clown speaking in the video tells Christians they're "harming the world" with their delusions. Like he and all his atheist and secular humanist pals like Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot and all the rest haven't done any harm over the last hundred years or so.....
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 07:40 am
gungasnake wrote:
Pauligirl wrote:
gungasnake wrote:

People don't willingly die en mass for lies.



Sure they do. They just don't know it's a lie..


The apostles would have known it if it was a lie.

You have no authority to make such a ridiculous assertion. Anyway, you didn't say the apostles didn't willingly die en mass for lies; your original statement was, "People don't willingly die en mass for lies".
Retarded yet typical.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 08:33 am
Pretty much every one of them went to his death rather than deny what he'd seen.

For that matter all anybody ever had to do to put an immediate stop to Christianity was produce one dead body which was supposedly being guarded by Roman soldiers and they couldn't even do that.

I mean, it's not like they didn't know they had a potential problem. Jesus had told the whole countryside he'd come back; the whole basic idea was to re-convince the world that there IS life after death. Basically it's not like Jesus was the first person to ever be heard from after he'd died, in fact he was pretty much the last. Centuries prior to that it had been fairly common and in fact the bible itself contains at least one other such story, i.e. the ghost story about Saul and the prophet Samuel and the "witch of Endor". That was rare in Saul's time as indicated by the story's description of the "witch" freaking out at it. In old kingdom Egyption times, it was altogether common. Ancient Egyptions viewed dying about the way we view moving from Alexandria Va. to Baltimore. It didn't mean you weren't going to see somebody any more; just less often.

Again by the time of Christ, all of the ancient relligious practices had ceased to work and it had been centuries since anybody had seen anybody after they died and the world had started believing in bullshit like atheism and evolutionism as is the case now. Jesus tried to set them straight.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 11:38 am
gungasnake wrote:
Pretty much every one of them went to his death rather than deny what he'd seen.

For that matter all anybody ever had to do to put an immediate stop to Christianity was produce one dead body which was supposedly being guarded by Roman soldiers and they couldn't even do that.
It is completely irrational to conclude that anyone ever witnessed a "living dead" Jesus. It's much more likely that the idea was popularized centuries later by misinformed/misguided followers, like the ones who slaughtered the Christian "heretics" and burned their books.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/24/2024 at 06:50:43