rosborne979 wrote:How can we discuss things reasonably if you switch back and forth between two different topics.
It's all one topic.
Evolution & The Big Bang = One Topic.
The whole idea of Evo if you keep going backwards goes all the way back to the big bang.
And it is there I get to ask, where did the STUFF come from?
Evolution believers are unable to answer where the STUFF came from.
Evolution believers are completely at a loss to answer this major question.
While on the other hand, those who believe in a creation can answer that problem.
If a God created then let it all happen it makes sense.
Like I said earlier.
Without God nothing makes sense.
With God everything makes sense.
Then you get to throw your question then, "Ok, where did God come from?"
He came from the beginning is the best answer I can give you.
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created.
Maybe right at that same moment is when God was born also.
BUT that is all speculation, just like every THEORY about the big bang and evolution is THEORY, not FACT.
Big Bang = Theory
Evolution = Theory
Creation = Theory
God = Theory
Which now brings us to Evolutions complete ruin with Occam's Razor.
Quote:Occam's razor (sometimes spelled Ockham's razor) is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham. The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. The principle is often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae ("law of parsimony" or "law of succinctness"):
" entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem, "
which translates to:
" entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity. "
This is often paraphrased as "All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the best one," or alternately, "the simplest explanation tends to be the right one." In other words, when multiple competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood.
The only thing needed in the Creation model is one assumption.
That God exists.
But for the Evolution model the assumptions are astronomical. You could probably use the letter A for each assumption needed and completly ring the earth with A's for the number of assumptions needed to make evolution even possible.
So just based on Occam's Razor.
Evolution is a FAR FETCHED DELUDED DREAM WORLD for those who wish to think there is NO God.
While creation which is based on only one assumption ( the existence of God ), is the most logical and SANE theory to even believe in.
IT TAKES MORE FAITH TO BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION, THAN TO BELIEVE IN GOD.