Universal Health Care To Cover Abortions?

ebrown_p wrote:

Why not, Miller?

I am just saying that I would like people who don't want a baby to not get pregnant.

I don't know why anyone would disagree with this?

This is even a pro-life stance since if there are no unwanted pregnancies there won't be any abortions. How is this not the best possible solution?

Maybe they should be sterilized. Why don't you volunteer for the procedure?

0 Replies

late to the thread but my solution

first abortion.... on the house ... anyone can make a mistake.

second abortion... you pay on a sliding scale

third abortion... on the house.... with involuntary sterilization.

0 Replies

Hmm... one of those rare occasions I agree with bear.

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

ebrown_p wrote:
Why not, Miller?

I am just saying that I would like people who don't want a baby to not get pregnant.

I don't know why anyone would disagree with this?

This is even a pro-life stance since if there are no unwanted pregnancies there won't be any abortions. How is this not the best possible solution?

Maybe they should be sterilized. Why don't you volunteer for the procedure?

If you cant carry on a decent conversation without insulting people,then dont bother.
Your remark is both crude and insulting.

0 Replies

McGentrix wrote:

Hmm... one of those rare occasions I agree with bear.

As do I.

0 Replies

Involuntary sterilization is not only creepy, it is uneconomical.

If I were faced with a third abortion (which costs taxpayers what-- $500) and was faced with involuntary sterilization--- I would instead choose an unwanted pregnancy costing taxpayers (assuming there are no complications) $8,505.

This, of course, doesn't count the cost of educating said child or for paying for welfare-- and seeing as this is an unwanted child there is a chance that protective services, and court costs will be needed.

Harsh punishment of pregnant women always sounds like a good idea until one considers the costs-- and in this case there are real economic consts in addition to the social costs.

0 Replies

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

late to the thread but my solution

first abortion.... on the house ... anyone can make a mistake.

second abortion... you pay on a sliding scale

third abortion... on the house.... with involuntary sterilization.

I would argue that only the first one is "on the house."

If a woman breezes (or anguishes) through the first extinquishment of the the life born within her body, why should we wink and nod toward subsequent displays of selfishness and rank stupidity?

Abortion should never be perceived as a Birth Control device. Those that choose to perceive it in this matter stretch the definition of choice, but, in any case, should not be allowed to have such a cavalier attitude towards human life.

0 Replies

I think that really seems to be a problem with (any) health insurnace.

Why is someone allowed to continue his life-style as before .... after he got an heart attack, a stroke? etc etc

0 Replies

Universal Health Care To Cover Abortions?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know