set, Of course I dont agree with Michaels spin. He would have us believe that vaccines have done nothing to stem the march of diseases, When just the opposite is true. We can cure acute pathogen derived diseases only with vaccines and antitoxins. He cannot disagree with that. My point is that, whether we agree with him or not, Drug diluents DO have some risks associated with this rather "crude" delivery system, namely inoculation .
Its like Democracy, Its a terrible form of govt except when you consider the others.
Note, that my opening line was
Quote:Somehwere beneath the "conspiracy" level that Michael preaches, lies some truth.
.
Hardly a ringing endorsement. Im sure that Michael would feel very comfortable with the "9-11" crowd.
The use of specific diluents like methyl/ethyl Hg, Zepherin, and phenols have associate risks (in the sub chronic and chronic level depending on the sensitivity of the inoculee). However, should Michael get bitten by a rabid dog, I dont think that "suing the Rockefellers" for some side effect of the antirabies serum would be the first thing on his plate.