Generation ChickenHawk

Weak reply from a weak poster.

Cycloptichorn

Why haven't they signed up???

Because there punk as$ bitches!!!!!!!

The military is B.B.W.P. (Black, Brown and Poor white.)

Lock me in a cell with a chickenhawk and I'll show you a newly born pacifist.

Amigo wrote:

Why haven't they signed up???

Because there punk as$ bitches!!!!!!!

The military is B.B.W.P. (Black, Brown and Poor white.)

Lock me in a cell with a chickenhawk and I'll show you a newly born pacifist.

What an idiotic thing to say.

The military represents a cross section of america, from the sons and daughters of the wealthy to those that seek a leg up in life.

Whatever buddy.

Thats why we don't have a draft. So today Bush Jr doesn't have show he's a pussy deserter by getting put into the coast gaurd and then going AWOL.

The reason why the rich don't fight is because they don't have to while there families profit the most from the war. Their souls are $hit.

And Cyc, I did not say they were equally represented did I? I said the military is a cross section. Their are far more non-wealthy people in America then wealthy, so why would their sons and daughters be "equally represented" in the military when they aren't elsewhere.

You can hardly deny they are there, but wish to whine about it instead like your usual MO.

I, and others have been over this before.

McGentrix wrote:

I, and others have been over this before.

Not successfully. You're probably used to that though, and have lowered your standards.

Cycloptichorn

The number of waivers granted to Army recruits with criminal backgrounds has grown about 65 percent in the last three years, increasing to 8,129 in 2006 from 4,918 in 2003, Department of Defense records show.

During that time, the Army has employed a variety of tactics to expand its diminishing pool of recruits. It has offered larger enlistment cash bonuses, allowed more high school dropouts and applicants with low scores on its aptitude test to join, and loosened weight and age restrictions.

It has also increased the number of so-called "moral waivers" to recruits with criminal pasts, even as the total number of recruits dropped slightly. The sharpest increase was in waivers for serious misdemeanors, which make up the bulk of all the Army's moral waivers. These include aggravated assault, burglary, robbery and vehicular homicide.

The number of waivers for felony convictions also increased, to 11 percent of the 8,129 moral waivers granted in 2006, from 8 percent.

Cycloptichorn wrote:

McGentrix wrote:

I, and others have been over this before.

Not successfully. You're probably used to that though, and have lowered your standards.

Cycloptichorn

Typical smart ass reply when you have nothing to add. It's been shown before and you are just to arrogant to admit you are wrong.

Quote:

And Cyc, I did not say they were equally represented did I? I said the military is a cross section. Their are far more non-wealthy people in America then wealthy, so why would their sons and daughters be "equally represented" in the military when they aren't elsewhere.

You can hardly deny they are there, but wish to whine about it instead like your usual MO.

I challenge that they are not even proportionally represented. Not that I care too much about that sort of thing. Mostly, I care about those - like the YR pukes in the video - who cheerlead war but don't have the sac to go do it themselves.

If you did a visual survey of the biggest 'war hawks' on the net, you will find that they are eerily similar in appearance: overweight, pasty white guys who look like they would fold in a half a second in a real scrap. It's not difficult to understand why they project their inadequacies onto the nation as a whole; The US military strength becomes THEIR strength in the minds of these deluded fools.

It's similar to the 'home team' phenomena...

Cycloptichorn