9/11 Proof on Video: CNN/FOXNEWS-Involvement!!!

This is a very disturbing video. I have come to no conclusions other than this is another reason we need new investigations of 911. I've watched only the first in the series. It's so mind blowing I'm gonna wait awhile before I look at the next one. It's all so convoluted. I know the Bushies are certainly capable of attacking us and making it look like someone else did it. Documented history proves false flag attacks have been the norm. But what of the conspiracy theorists who do studies like this? Are they up to something or just genious patriots who want answers for all the right national security reasons? The matter is so hugely important maybe even a matter of survival of the species if such madmen got their fingers on a nookYOUler button they've threatened to use. We need public investigations with scientists from both sides and with the whole world watching like it means something.

What a crock of BS...

I notice they don't use the feed I was watching that day... CNBC...

I watched the plane hit live. The CNBC video shows the plane banking so it is easy to see that it IS a plane. The anchors didn't notice it on the live feed which isn't suprising because they were busy looking at the camera not their feed.

As for the pixel to pixel comparison, standard TV video is 480 pixels high. There is no such thing as a "micro comparison" with the few pixels that represent that "plane nose". Instead they increase the resolution to try to fake that they are closer. The pixels are not what would have been on the video. The pixels are "enhanced" meaning they CHANGED the pixels to do their comparison.

This could be an attempt by government informants, designed to 'poison the well' of the 9/11 truth movement.

"This could be an attempt by government informants, designed to 'poison the well' of the 9/11 truth movement." Sure it could. But what's most BS is saying there are not plenty of legit reasons for new investigations.

But upon further examination, the pixel to pixel comparison is exactly the same as the Empire State Building. It's obvious the Empire State building was rammed through the Tower. You only need to do an actual pixel to pixel comparison to prove it..


But then when you look at it again and turn it on its side it looks exactly like the flame on a bic lighter. So that would mean the tower was attacked with a bic lighter.

Or it could just be someone that is sane.

Absolutely!

Zogby Poll: Over 70 Million American Adults Support New 9/11 Investigation

The poll is the first scientific survey of Americans' belief in a 9/11 cover up or the need to investigate possible US government complicity, and was commissioned to inform deliberations at the June 2~4 "9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future" conference in Chicago. Poll results indicate 42% believe there has indeed been a cover up (with 10% unsure) and 45% think "Congress or an International Tribunal should re-investigate the attacks, including whether any US government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success" (with 8% unsure).

I said it before and I will say it again.

When anyone comes up with a plausible alternative explaination that explains even the most basic facts (like what happend to the passengers that were on the planes) I will stop ridiculing you people.

The unwillingness to give up wacko conspiracy theories in spite of the fact that no one can come up with even one single plausible alternative to the official version is pathetic.

So instead of these silly videos.... how about a plausible alternative. I asked for one before and I am still waiting.

I think you are going to wait a long time if you are looking for plausibility from our conspiricy friends here on a2k.

I can barely address this silliness 'cause I think there's more credible evidence of the Big Bang than this incredible attempt to muddy up already turbulent waters. Mind numbing nonsense from the conspiracy theorist who are actually conspirators themselves in trying to fool the willing fool. If you're surfing around the internet for actual facts, you will find this crap thrust at you like bait for the lunatic fringe that it is.

Prominent Engineer Calls for a New Investigation of 9/11

SAN FRANCISCO, CA July 16, 2007 -- San Francisco architect Richard Gage, AIA, founder of the group, 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth,' announced today the statement of support from J. Marx Ayres, former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission and former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council.

"We are proud to have the support of Marx Ayres, a nationally recognized expert in building energy systems and earthquake damage to building nonstructural systems, in our search for the truth about the events of 9/11.", said Mr. Gage. "He has signed our petition requesting a reinvestigation of those tragic events and he has now gone even further by providing his personal statement of support for a new investigation of 9/11."

Mr. Ayres is a nationally recognized expert in building air conditioning design and analysis, energy conservation, thermal energy storage, commissioning of HVAC systems, and earthquake damage to building mechanical systems, with over 55 years of experience. Co-founder of one of the largest building engineering firms in Los Angeles, Mr. Ayres has been in responsible charge of the design of hundreds of major building projects, including high rise offices, commercial centers, hospitals and laboratories, hotels and residential buildings, universities and colleges, schools, theaters and entertainment centers, jails and correctional facilities, TV and sound studios, governmental buildings and industrial facilities.

In his statement, Mr. Ayres wrote, "I support the work of Dr. Steven Jones. He has provided a scientific foundation for the collapse of the three World Trade Center (WTC) towers. I read the FEMA September, 2002 report, prepared by the American Society of Civil Engineers, and initially accepted their theory of the collapse of WTC 1 and 2. As more information became available on the web, I was motivated to research the subject in a more rigorous manner. I have carefully studied the Jones 2006 paper, "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?" and concluded that it is a rational step-by-step study that meets the accepted standards for scientific building research. His critical reviews of the FEMA, NIST, and 9/11 Commission reports are correct."

Mr. Ayres continues, "Steven Jones' call for a ?'serious investigation' of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fire, but through the use of pre-positioned "cutter-charges" must be the rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/160707_b_Engineer.htm

And next we are pleased to announce that Mr Peter Smith, a recognized employee of the month for Rotorooter in Podunk, WI has joined the call for a new investigation. Mr Smith is an expert in "away go troubles down the drain" and feels that he should keep up with the Joneses, Dr Steven Jones that is.

parados, I guess you had to say something.

When will the decorators step forward to begin an investigation of the exploding wallpaper? You'd think that structural engineers should be the experts to examine the reasons the towers collapsed and damaged surrounding buildings:

http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2001/december5/wtc-125.html

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html

http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/wtc.shtml

There are many more.

I suppose if the air-conditioning had been working properly, it would have kept the steel girders from softening, buckling and causing the failure of the central structure.

Why do demolition companies exist when all you have to do is douse your high rise with jet fuel and PRESTO! you got a primo 100% demolished building?


j/k i dont know WTF happened, but i damn well know that jet fuel demolition was one precise event. i mean seriously it was so tall you would have thought it would have tipped sideways or something.

Research it -- the towers were constructed to collapse straight down precisely if an aircraft crashed into it accidentally. This was no accident, of course but the results are the same. In fact, it did not altogether work as surround buildings were damaged. It would have been far worse if the towers had tipped over.

It wasn't just the aircraft fuel -- it was jumbo jets piercing the buildings like explosive filled missiles.

Unless your future demolitionists feel it's economically feasible to buy jumbo jets and fly them into buildings you want to demolish. It's unlikely to work on buildings not constructed with this innovative approach to skyscraper design.

I don't believe every theory out there....but I don't belive the complete 9/11 report either.

I also believe that it's entirely possible that the 9/11 report is accurate and there is no conspiracy in the attack itself....but I wouldn't be surprised if the government simply allowed it to happen by not doing anything to stop it.

Biggest bullsh!t on Ak2

WTC - Designed to Withstand MULTIPLE Plane Impacts

TWO WTC DESIGNERS SAY BUILDING DESIGNED FOR PLANE IMPACT

February 27, 1993: WTC Engineer Says Building Would Survive Jumbo Jet Hitting It

It was not the plane cash alone that caused the WTC to fall.

Remember FIRE??