1
   

Walking with ancestors: discovery rewrites American prehisto

 
 
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 12:48 am
This is not something .... 'Chinese are said to have been ...." or similar: archaeologists found proved evidence now.

Quote:
Walking with ancestors: discovery rewrites American prehistory

By David Keys, Archaeology Correspondent

Published: 05 July 2005
Humans arrived in America 25,000 years earlier than previously thought - at least 40,000 years ago - footprints found near Mexico City have proved.

British and Mexican archaeologists said the discovery of the prints, made in volcanic ash near the town of Puebla, 80 miles south-east of Mexico City, will force a total rewrite of humanity's early migrations and is one of the most important archaeological finds of recent decades.

The layer of volcanic ash in which the 269 footprints are preserved has been dated by two different techniques - radiocarbon and optically stimulated luminescence dating - to between 38,000 and 39,000 years ago. Until now the earliest definite dates for a human presence in the Americas were 15,000 years ago. Given the location of the find, deep in the Americas, it makes it almost certain that humans must have first entered the Americas at least 40,000 years ago.

When combined with existing knowledge on prehistoric climate, the discovery suggests humans may have entered the Americas during a slightly less cold phase in the last Ice Age about 50,000 years ago. They would have walked over the ice-bound Bering Strait or island-hopped to Alaska via the Kuril and Aleutian chains of islands.

This means the migration into the Americas occurred at about the same time as the normally accepted date of the early Aboriginal colonisation of Australia and some archaeologists now believe that the first Americans were Australoid peoples closely related to the early Aborigines.

Given that the new evidence, it is also now conceivable that humans entered the Americas even earlier, perhaps during a much warmer spell about 70,000 years ago. It means archaeologists will now have to take more seriously two claims that a site in Brazil and another in Chile date from 50,000 and 33,000 years ago respectively.

The Mexican footprints were made by four to six individuals - probably two adults and between two and four children - in at least three episodes, several weeks or even months apart. Each time they were walking barefoot along the shore of a large lake, now Lake Valsequillo. The imprints were sealed and preserved by ash from successive eruptions of a nearby volcano, Mount Tolukuilla.

As well as human footprints, the archaeologists also found deer, camel, wolf (or dog) and puma prints.

The discovery, announced in London yesterday, was made by Sylvia Gonzalez and Professor Dave Huddart of Liverpool John Moores University and Professor Matthew Bennett of Bourne-mouth University. Dr Gonzalez said: "It shows our ancestors adapted to new environments much quicker and more easily than we had imagined."

Humans arrived in America 25,000 years earlier than previously thought - at least 40,000 years ago - footprints found near Mexico City have proved.

British and Mexican archaeologists said the discovery of the prints, made in volcanic ash near the town of Puebla, 80 miles south-east of Mexico City, will force a total rewrite of humanity's early migrations and is one of the most important archaeological finds of recent decades.

The layer of volcanic ash in which the 269 footprints are preserved has been dated by two different techniques - radiocarbon and optically stimulated luminescence dating - to between 38,000 and 39,000 years ago. Until now the earliest definite dates for a human presence in the Americas were 15,000 years ago. Given the location of the find, deep in the Americas, it makes it almost certain that humans must have first entered the Americas at least 40,000 years ago.

When combined with existing knowledge on prehistoric climate, the discovery suggests humans may have entered the Americas during a slightly less cold phase in the last Ice Age about 50,000 years ago. They would have walked over the ice-bound Bering Strait or island-hopped to Alaska via the Kuril and Aleutian chains of islands.

This means the migration into the Americas occurred at about the same time as the normally accepted date of the early Aboriginal colonisation of Australia and some archaeologists now believe that the first Americans were Australoid peoples closely related to the early Aborigines.
Given that the new evidence, it is also now conceivable that humans entered the Americas even earlier, perhaps during a much warmer spell about 70,000 years ago. It means archaeologists will now have to take more seriously two claims that a site in Brazil and another in Chile date from 50,000 and 33,000 years ago respectively.

The Mexican footprints were made by four to six individuals - probably two adults and between two and four children - in at least three episodes, several weeks or even months apart. Each time they were walking barefoot along the shore of a large lake, now Lake Valsequillo. The imprints were sealed and preserved by ash from successive eruptions of a nearby volcano, Mount Tolukuilla.

As well as human footprints, the archaeologists also found deer, camel, wolf (or dog) and puma prints.

The discovery, announced in London yesterday, was made by Sylvia Gonzalez and Professor Dave Huddart of Liverpool John Moores University and Professor Matthew Bennett of Bourne-mouth University. Dr Gonzalez said: "It shows our ancestors adapted to new environments much quicker and more easily than we had imagined."
Source
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,711 • Replies: 21
No top replies

 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 12:51 am
Quote:
Early Americans linked to Aborigines
By David Keys

London
July 5, 2005 - 1:29AM


The discovery of 40,000-year-old human footprints in Mexico may link early Americans to Australia's Aborigines.

Archaeologists said yesterday the footprints showed that mankind colonised the New World at least 40,000 years ago, 25,000 years earlier than previous estimates.

The new evidence - 269 human footprints preserved in ancient volcanic ash - was discovered by Mexican and British archaeologists near the Mexican town of Puebla, 120 kilometres south-east of Mexico City.

"The discovery of the footprints in Mexico is, I believe, important because it shows that humanity's spread across the world was much faster than previously thought," said one archaeologist, Sylvia Gonzalez, from John Moore's University in Liverpool.

"The new discovery also gives additional support to the idea that the very early first Americans may well have been of Australoid type closely related to the Australian Aborigines."

She said the footprints showed that early humans adapted to new environments much quicker and more easily than previously thought.

Until now the earliest definite archaeological dates for a human presence in the Americas is around 15,000 years ago in various parts of North and South America.

Dr Gonzalez said that because the new footprints showed humans were in southern Mexico up to to 39,000 years ago, and because human migration takes centuries, humans must have entered the Americas more than 40,000 years ago.

Dr Gonzalez said the new discovery suggested that humans may have entered the Americas during a slightly less cold phase.

Source
0 Replies
 
Debra Law
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 01:41 am
Interesting . . . and yet just a tiny drop in the earth's timeline consisting of billions of years. Human beings are still in their infancy.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 01:56 am
Quote:

The Oldest American?
Footprints from the Past



http://www.mexicanfootprints.co.uk/Images/fig2.jpg

Right human footprint, showing toe
impressions and typical figure of eight shape

http://www.mexicanfootprints.co.uk/Images/New%20Images/clear_foot.jpg
Human left footprint showing toe impressions and
slight heel impression. Modern size 43 for scale



The discovery of 40,000 years old human footprints in Central Mexico challenges accepted theories on when and how humans first colonised the Americas.



The timing, route and origin of the first colonisation of the Americas remains one of the most contentious topics in human evolution. Experts from many disciplines are searching for the answers to three seemingly straightforward questions:


• From where did the first people come?


• How did they enter the Americas?


• When did they arrive?



Until recently archaeologists thought they had the answers to these questions. Evidence suggested that the Americas had been colonised towards the end of the Pleistocene period by hunter-gatherers migrating from Siberia into Alaska across the Bering Land Bridge, an exposed continental shelf, when sea levels were lower. This is known as the Clovis-First Model.



According to this model the earliest occupation of the Americas began 11,500 years ago.



The discovery of fossilised human footprints in the Valsequillo Basin, Central Mexico challenges this accepted viewpoint and provides new evidence that humans settled in the Americas as early as 40,000 years ago.



http://www.mexicanfootprints.co.uk/Images/New%20Images/mexico_map.jpg
Location of Mexico and Mexico City


http://www.mexicanfootprints.co.uk/Images/fig3.jpg
Location of the modern Valsequillo reservoir and
Cerro Toluquilla south-east of Puebla.


http://www.mexicanfootprints.co.uk/Images/figure4.jpg
Toluquilla quarry and the upper surface of the
Xalnene Ash where the footprints are preserved.

The footprints were discovered in the summer of 2003, on the floor of an abandoned quarry by Dr Silvia Gonzalez, Professor David Huddart (Liverpool John Moores University) and Professor Matthew Bennett (Bournemouth University). At the time of the discovery the team were working on dating and mapping the geology of the Valsequillo Basin, Puebla, Mexico.



Dr Gonzalez is one of a growing number of scientists who believes that the first Americans may have arrived by water rather than on foot, island hopping along the Pacific coast. CLICK HERE

Source
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 01:58 am
Quote:
http://www.mexicanfootprints.co.uk/Images/figure40.jpg
Possible migration routes by humans into the
Americas, with some important sites noted.

Until recently archaeologists thought they had the answers to these questions. Evidence suggested that the Americas had been colonised at the end of the last Ice Age during the Pleistocene period by hunter-gatherers migrating from Siberia into Alaska across an exposed continental shelf, the Bering Land Bridge. This is known as the Clovis-First Model.



The discovery of new evidence, such as the prehistoric footprints in the Valsequillo Basin, points to the presence of humans in the Americas much earlier than many originally thought. A growing number of scientists, including Dr Silvia Gonzalez, who leads the footprints research, also believe that these first colonists may have arrived by water rather than on foot using the Pacific Coast Migration Route.
Source
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 02:00 am
Quote:
Why are the footprints important?
Source
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 02:05 am
Quote:
http://www.mexicanfootprints.co.uk/Images/figure13a.jpg
Top of the Xalnene Ash and
the overlying lake sediments,
Toluquilla quarry wall


http://www.mexicanfootprints.co.uk/Images/figure14a.jpg
Left human footprint on the Xalnene
ash, Toluquilla quarry.


http://www.mexicanfootprints.co.uk/Images/figure15a.jpg
Left human footprint, showing figure of
eight shape, Toluquilla quarry


The Xalnene ash layer must have been exposed at some point during a period of low lake level, creating a new shoreline. The early Americans walked across this, leaving behind footprints. It is likely that changes in climate along with eruptions of the Cerro Toluquilla volcano led to rises in the level of the lake after the ash fall. This resulted in the quick burial of the footprints by lake sediments and their subsequent preservation. Hence, detailed work into the palaeoclimate and palaeoenvironmental conditions in the basin is crucial to our understanding of the nature of the footprint site. This work is currently being undertaken by a team of palaeoenvironmental scientists (Dr Rhiannon Stevens, Prof. Melanie Leng (NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory and University of Nottingham), Prof. Sarah Metcalfe (University of Nottingham), Dr Angela Lamb (NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory) and Dr María del Socorro Lozano García (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)). Click here for further information: http://www.geog.nottingham.ac.uk/~metcalfe/
Source
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 03:12 am
Wow!
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 04:06 am
The folks that left Africa 90,000 years ago in the midst of a decades long dry spell must have had the same gene as my uncle Jim. He moved every year. He always wanted to see what was over that next hill.

Whoever they were, they moved throughout the world with incredible speed. Was there some tribal custom amongst them that each generation must find a new valley, a new river to cross? What must it have been like for them to realize that there were no other humans around, just them, the people.

Joe(we have seen no footprints, seen no fires)Nation
0 Replies
 
AngeliqueEast
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 04:15 am
Most excellent!
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 04:18 am
And that was just the ones that left footprints.
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:16 am
That's fascinating. I've just done some work regarding early human inhabitation of Australia (related to my job, not scientific work I hasten to add) and theorists here are beginning to push the 40,000 years even further back although from what I understand the evidence is still very tentative. But this is fascinating information.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:28 am
Joe asks why humans would continue to wander, but has the answer in his uncle--the grass may be greener. Our peripatetic ancestors would have been looking for game and forage. If crossing the next hill revealed a valley full of deer, or blueberries, time to move into that valley. If the deer wander off, or the berries are all picked, time to find a new valley.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 08:21 am
Very cool!
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 05:40 pm
Wowsa, I love this kind of news!
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 07:43 pm
I always had trouble with the Clovis picture. Stratigraphy Rules!! Laser Induced Thermoluminescence requires a limited set of circumstances so that the sample radioaccumulation values can be compared to a standard. The only thing is that those footprints had to be covered with a hot (really hot) ash. But seeing as the stratigraphy follows out to an area where some buried seashells were available for C14 , all seems right to me. Im sure the GSA is gonna pub the dating data.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 11:06 pm
On the this part of the Mexican footprints homepage, you can find some high resolution photos and additional infos in the press release.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 11:11 pm
pretty cool stuff
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 04:34 am
Wherever they went, they killed and ate, or picked and ate, everything in sight and then moved on.

This is sounding more and more like my family.

(What? You speared the last ox-beast? Okay... pack up.)

Joe(Where's that map?)Nation
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 05:14 am
So now I am wondering about the evolutionary aspects of nostalgia (homesickness). Was it some sort of genetic effort to limit our wanderings (with a not well-informed nod by me towards Dawkins).
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Walking with ancestors: discovery rewrites American prehisto
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 09:38:37