132
   

Why do people deny evolution?

 
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Mon 12 Oct, 2015 08:06 am
@martinies,
Quote:
Like yah sense of humor but you seemed by your answer to be certain that c the speed of light was not a constant across all ref frames. Why . That was my enquiry.


Yes, I know, but this is the wrong therad for this. Told you twice, mate.
martinies
 
  1  
Mon 12 Oct, 2015 09:51 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Well we are talking god the designer of the universe here and c as a constant is the most important part of gods design of the universe dna included if ya ask me.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Mon 12 Oct, 2015 10:07 am
@martinies,
Quote:
Well we are talking god the designer of the universe here and c as a constant is the most important part of gods design of the universe dna included if ya ask me.


again, this is not the thjread for this! You may open one....
martinies
 
  1  
Mon 12 Oct, 2015 10:36 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Que dna is directly apart of the evolution debate.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Mon 12 Oct, 2015 10:41 am
@martinies,
Quote:
Que dna is directly apart of the evolution debate.


where did I say it didn't???
martinies
 
  1  
Mon 12 Oct, 2015 11:42 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Why do people denny evolution . Answer because they dont understand it and the way it works by relative design.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Mon 12 Oct, 2015 12:03 pm
@martinies,
Quote:
Why do people denny evolution . Answer because they dont understand it and the way it works by relative design.



It is much simpler than that. People deny macro evolution because of a lack of evidence.


very logical and rational.
martinies
 
  1  
Mon 12 Oct, 2015 12:25 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
What about fossil evedents in rock strata. Thats an evolutionary map of changing forms. Or maybe you just dont like the idea of changing life forms.
martinies
 
  1  
Mon 12 Oct, 2015 10:17 pm
@martinies,
Nonlocality could be descrbed as the difference in local phenomena. The big bang caused a difference in nolocality that is locality. Dna is changed by the difference in enviroment.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Tue 13 Oct, 2015 01:49 am
@martinies,
Quote:
What about fossil evedents in rock strata


Very simple.
It is circular reasoning, hence not worth a thing and no evidence at all!

fossils are used to date the rock strata,
and rock strata are dated by the fossils.


Looks very circular to me, mate!

Quote:
Thats an evolutionary map of changing forms.


As you just read, no it doesn't.

Quote:
Or maybe you just dont like the idea of changing life forms.


It is ok with me. It has nothing to do with my likes or dislikes and everything to do with evidence of which there is really none.

if there is evidence I am ready to accept it. But till now it is all bollocks and shite.

martinies
 
  1  
Tue 13 Oct, 2015 02:09 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Would you take your finger print as being your identity. I think we could exept coal as evidence of the existance of prehistoric forest. You must agree with that.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Tue 13 Oct, 2015 02:17 am
@martinies,
Quote:
Would you take your finger print as being your identity. I think we could exept coal as evidence of the existance of prehistoric forest. You must agree with that.


I don't know why you bring this up.
Could you adress the circular reasoning please?

It is all so flawed
martinies
 
  1  
Tue 13 Oct, 2015 03:47 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Where would reptiles as forms have there existance from if not from amphibians. And rock strata is the evidents that this change of form took place
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Tue 13 Oct, 2015 06:02 am
@martinies,
Quote:
Where would reptiles as forms have there existance from if not from amphibians. And rock strata is the evidents that this change of form took place


ok sounds nice.

Now some PROOF please!!! man o man
martinies
 
  1  
Tue 13 Oct, 2015 07:35 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Please define proof.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Tue 13 Oct, 2015 07:57 am
@martinies,
Quote:
Please define proof.


Oh my god! People who have no proof do ask this sort of questions!

Let me rephrase.

Give me some evidence


man o man
martinies
 
  1  
Tue 13 Oct, 2015 11:17 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Evidence is always relative is that what you are saying. Radio carbon dating gives the relative rate of change in a ref frame. Fossils can be accurately dated in relstiveness to other fossils.
martinies
 
  1  
Tue 13 Oct, 2015 12:15 pm
@martinies,
Its my belief that all local forms of animal life have a nonlocal root that makes them living local nature.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Tue 13 Oct, 2015 01:42 pm
@martinies,
Quote:
Fossils can be accurately dated in relstiveness to other fossils.


No, they can't.
http://www.truthingenesis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/carbon-dating-flaws-300x224.jpg

0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  1  
Tue 13 Oct, 2015 01:46 pm
Maybe you two can do a tag-team jello wrestling for the champs title?
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 03:16:53