Reply
Thu 21 Jun, 2007 09:38 am
Body absorbs 5lb of make-up chemicals a year
By Paul Stokes
21/06/2007
Telegraph UK
Women who use make-up on a daily basis are absorbing almost 5lb of chemicals a year into their bodies, it is claimed. Out-of-date lipstick may be a hothouse for bacteria. Many use more than 20 different beauty products a day striving to look their best while nine out of 10 apply make-up which is past its use by date.
Dependence on cosmetics and toiletries means that a cocktail of 4lb 6oz of chemicals a year is absorbed into the body through the skin. Some synthetic compounds involved have been linked to side effects ranging from skin irritation to premature ageing and cancer.
Richard Bence, a biochemist who has spent three years researching conventional products, said: "We really need to start questioning the products we are putting on our skin and not just assume that the chemicals in them are safe.
"We have no idea what these chemicals do when they are mixed together, the effect could be much greater than the sum of the individual parts." Mr Bence, an advocate of organic beauty products, believes that absorbing chemicals through the skin in more dangerous than swallowing them.
He said: "If lipstick gets into your mouth it is broken down by the enzymes in saliva and in the stomach. But chemicals get straight into your bloodstream, there is no protection."
Warnings over using out-of-date lipstick and mascara have also been issued by the Royal College of Optometrists which believes such items are a "hothouse" for harmful bacteria.
Clio Turton, of the Soil Association, said: "Many women are using over 20 different products a day, bombarding themselves with hundreds of different chemicals. They should be asking themselves 'is that eyelash conditioner really essential?' "
Among chemicals under scrutiny are parabens (para-hydroxybenzoic acids) which are preservatives used in products including soap, shampoo, deodorant and baby lotion. Traces of parabens have been found in breast tumour samples, although its link to the development of the cancer is disputed.
Sodium lauryl sulphate, used to help create lather in soaps, shampoo, shaving foam, toothpaste and bubble bath, can cause skin irritation.
The Cosmetic, Toiletry and Perfumery Association said there was no reason for worry because the products were covered by European Union rules requiring them to be safe.
A spokesman said: "The cocktail effect is an urban myth. We do know how different chemicals react individually and can predict how they interact with each other and this is taken into account when the safety of products is assessed."
Multiply times 1,000 if you're Tammy Faye Bakker Messner.
-- actually, since the poor woman is gravely ill with cancer, it does make you wonder --
jespah wrote:Multiply times 1,000 if you're Tammy Faye Bakker Messner.
-- actually, since the poor woman is gravely ill with cancer, it does make you wonder --
Sorry, but that's not even funny - the correlation between "natural" plant oils (they contain plant estrogens, chemically indistinguishable from the animal kind and treated by the body as such) and breast swelling is extremely high, even in men >
Quote:WEDNESDAY, June 28 (HealthDay News) -- Personal-care products containing tea tree oils and lavender appear to cause abnormal breast development in pre-pubescent boys, a new study found.
The ingredients, which have an estrogen-like effect, are found in various shampoos, lotions, soaps and other products.
http://www.healthfinder.gov/news/newsstory.asp?docID=533503
> and actuarially speaking the danger of estrogen tumors in both women who underwent fertility treatments in order to conceive, as well as to their daughters (a generation just now reaching marriage age) is extremely high.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16606439
.......and last but not least (statistically speaking here, no claim to medical expertise!) if the woman who undergoes one or more fertility treatment near or past menopause is also fat...>
Quote:Body weight: Recent studies have suggested that adult weight gain, especially just before and after menopause, increases breast cancer risk. After menopause a woman's ovaries stop producing estrogen and the primary source for estrogen is a woman's body fat.
http://envirocancer.cornell.edu/FactSheet/General/fs10.estrogen.cfm
> ... the breast cancer is almost certain to spread to bones before it's detected, as in the case of Mrs. Elizabeth Edwards.
Europeans picked up on this long ago and stopped using deodorant.
cjhsa wrote:Europeans picked up on this long ago and stopped using deodorant.
CJHSA - fellow life member of the NRA here, don't like to contradict you, but note the cancer risks cited refer to so-called "natural" products - not deodorants, all of which contain some chemicals.
Everything is chemical. Some things are just less dangerous than others. My Mom has been sick for years with various ailments, and one thing that she's always done is colored her hair, since she started going gray at 30. Fifty-plus years of that chemical **** has pretty much done her in.
Ted Nugent is a huge proponent of getting rid of most chemicals and using natural occuring replacements, when possible, especially of artificial scents - which I have a horrible time with.
People have been decorating their bodies with cosmetics for thousands of years.
Tea tree oil and lavendar? Both sound like naturally occuring substances to me.
Women, not too long ago, put arsenic on their faces, arms, upper body to achieve the pale look that was so popular for the well to do. Obviously unhealthy, but arsenic is also a naturally occuring substance.
I think people engage is much worse risk taking behavior every day by smoking a cigarette or driving to work.
People who get a tan are probably doing worse for their health.