Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2003 06:49 am
Well, try here and see what you get.
0 Replies
the prince
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2003 06:52 am
Which one are you talking abt ?
0 Replies
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2003 09:51 am
Jon Stewart of "The Daily Show" regularly prods with humor about the avoidance of mentioning Osama by the White House.
0 Replies
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2003 10:07 am
generalissimo franco is still dead--Osama who?
0 Replies
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2003 09:17 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
Jon Stewart of "The Daily Show" regularly prods with humor about the avoidance of mentioning Osama by the White House.

The avoidance is probably caused by the fact that Dubya has as much trouble pronouncing the name "Osama" as he does the word "nuclear."
0 Replies
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2003 10:03 pm
The details of the search for Osama are "sensitive."


DoD News Briefing - Secretary Rumsfeld and Gen. Myers
Tuesday, August 5, 2003


Q: General Myers?

Q: General Myers, while we're on the search questions, you mentioned al Qaeda and searching in the Pakistan and Afghanistan area. Understanding that we don't have him till we have him, can you bring us up to date on the hunt for Osama bin Laden? Do you still believe that he is in that Afghanistan-Pakistan area?

Myers: Well, I think -- there's a question of whether he's alive or not. If he's alive, a lot of people believe that the region he is in is in the -- that border area where the terrain is very rugged and where he might find people sympathetic to his outlook on life.

And beyond that, it's one of those things, just like Saddam Hussein, that we'll continue to keep pressure on those kind of individuals. It's another -- it's important. It's one more step. You know, if we were to get Osama bin Laden and Zawahiri today, it would not end the threat from al Qaeda. They are -- they have morphed into an organization that is not as hierarchical as it previously was, more of a network today. And so it would just be one step. It would be obviously a big step, but just one step in working the whole international terrorism piece.

Q: But unlike the search for Saddam, it seems like the tips are not coming in, as opposed to the search for Saddam, where we're being told at least that your intelligence is being developed for that.

Myers: I wouldn't make that assumption -- just because you haven't heard of what's going on, that there's nothing --

Q: Can you tell us how that's going?

Myers: No, I'd prefer -- it gets into the operational details, intelligence details, and that's just something that is quite sensitive.

"Jon Stewart of "The Daily Show" regularly prods with humor about the avoidance of mentioning Osama by the White House."

It's because the details are "sensitive."
0 Replies
Reply Thu 7 Aug, 2003 08:47 am
The rationlization that the details are sensitive is invalid. The White House has a public relations problem and are poor sales people. They've committed the number one error in selling -- assuming the sale. Bush should know from his HBS background that flaunting the laws of attrition is a poor sales technique and yet that's exactly what he's doing.
0 Replies
Reply Thu 7 Aug, 2003 10:57 am
Sensitive works - sometimes. It's sure easy to abuse, though.
0 Replies

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
  1. Forums
  2. » DEAD BROTHERS . . .
  3. » Page 13
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/04/2022 at 09:12:57