Just to inform you folks what's all out there...
The Conservative Exodus Project
Quote:We, the undersigned, petition the Republican Party to support real conservative candidates for the 2008 presidential nomination.
In the belief that the Republican Party has become too liberal, we pledge, unless a suitable candidate is selected for the GOP 2008 presidential nomination, to stay home or vote third party (e.g. Constitution Party). [..]
CEP is a group of traditionalist conservatives who, realizing that the GOP is moving too leftward, started a petition on March 3, 2007 to encourage conservatives to leave the GOP if a suitable presidential candidate is not chosen in 2008.
They comprehensively list which candidates are all unacceptable.
Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich - too liberal.
Sam Brownback, Fred Thompson - too leftwing.
Quote:The following presidential candidates are UNACCEPTABLE: John McCain, Rudolph Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Sam Brownback, Mike Huckabee, Chuck Hagel, Condoleezza Rice, et al. They all support the third-world invasion of the United States.
Unless a candidate is chosen who is tough on immigration (e.g. Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo, Duncan Hunter, or another candidate yet to announce), we shall have no choice but to vote third party. [..]
Addendum: Rumors abound that Fred Thompson may announce an exploratory committee. We would find him an unacceptable candidate, for he has a dubious record on immigration and is a neocon.
Tommy Thompson too would be unacceptable.
Well, they're strict.
OK, amidst all the foolishness, you've got to give them one thing - at least they return the term "liberal", which Americans have somehow come to think means "leftwing", to its proper meaning:
Quote:Returning to its liberal roots, the GOP has recently become the party of big business, neoliberal globalism, and unwise interventionism - not the party of conservatism.
In the same vein, implying a more traditional three-way ideological landscape like what we know in mainland Europe (conservative vs. free-market liberal vs. leftwing), they do have a point when pointing out the elements of today's Republicanism that are better named "radical" than "conservative":
Quote:(4) We oppose the illegal neocon war in Iraq. The transformation of the Middle East to liberal democracy is Jacobin, not conservative. [..]
(2) We oppose free trade [..]. Free trade is both destroying our economy and undermining our sovereignty. Historically, conservatives have opposed free trade, and they should, but many in the GOP have been "neoconned" on this issue.
On the other hand, they have a link to a "Lou Dobbs for President group"...