0
   

Why aren’t they all just considered ridiculous?

 
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 06:14 pm
Phoenix32890 wrote:
chumly wrote:
Why should there be a moral judgment placed on how one perceives / responds to a given religion or it's adherents?


I think that there are certain things, in a society, that are deemed by many to be sacrosanct, like motherhood and apple pie. Religions fall in this category. It is so much a part of the fabric of many people, that it has attained a place of reverence. Whether this reverence is deserved or not, is a question that might reasonably be argued. Like it or not, disparaging a person's faith is seen by many as a grave social gaffe, at the least.


Well, I think a couple things - first of all there are definite degrees to which people take their disparaging. some people simply want to state they think something's ridiculous; others have to hammer that home with more force and nastiness and frequency. Also, I do think its interesting that mom and apple pie and whatever else are more likely to be vigorously ridiculed on an internet forum than face-to-face. It's not so much of a social gaffe when there is anonymity involved.
0 Replies
 
stlstrike3
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 06:23 pm
Re: Why aren't they all just considered ridiculous?
Chumly wrote:
Why aren't Christians / Jews / Moslems / Buddhists etc simply considered to be eccentric, crazy and ridiculous?

Even many people whom one would surmise would know better appear to take them seriously at least to some fair degree and at least in the context of the popular media and in many cases far beyond that realm too.


The difference between "crazy" and "faithful" is determined by counting up a sufficient number of people that believe the same thing.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 06:58 pm
snood wrote:
Lemme ask y'all something...

Is your feeling that it's right to ridicule religions at all limited by the setting? I mean to say, I think there are things that are acceptable in a cyber forum that might seem otherwise face-to-face. Granted, as someone has just said - this is an internet forum, and pretty much anything goes and sissies take their marbles and go home. But would you approach the subject any differently with real ive people in - say, a classroom? Or would you be just as apt to barrel right into a bunch of people discussing their religions and say some thing like "Well I think you're all deluded and your beliefs are superstitions nonsense?"

Would it constrain or change your words if you had to look someone in the eyes and say 'your imaginary god/friend is hogwash, just like the tooth fairy and Santa'?

As you can easily guess, I ask because I don't think it would be as easy in person - and I think if that's true, then it begs other questions about what the ridiculing person is doing, and why.

=======
I think, and people have told me, that I am no different on this forum than I am in real, face to face, life. I am true to my word. I see no value in hiding the truth. I take time when making judgments about situations and the people in them. I do my best at all times. And I am funny. Maybe funnier in real life, I don't know.

My co-workers all know I don't believe there is a god. It's a question I've been asked and I always answer honestly. Some of them are pretty confused about it. "How come," asked one a few months ago, "that the only one around here who doesn't believe in God is the only one who won't lie to the clients." Everybody laughed.

The Muslims and I have long talks because I am curious about the workings of Islam and they LOVE to talk. They give me books. They like it that I, unlike others, do not resent them taking six days a year off for holy days, in additional to taking the Christian holidays too. I tell them I think it's a racket and that I am starting a new religion where every other Monday is holy.

The Christians and the Catholics are a little stunned when my disbelief floats into a conversation. They have a hard time getting a handle on it.
But I tell them I don't live life waiting for some god to change the laws of nature and make a miracle. I think life is a miracle. I don't need to pray for things to get better while I am doing all I can to make them better. Wasted energy, isn't it?

Some people are a little sad, but I think they are sad that they haven't found another believer to share with. We've had talks about that too. I tell them I'm okay with just having this life and that I think this one life is all that they are going to get as well. Live well once. They wince.

I don't do well with hypocrites and I find that a lot of believers are hypocrites mainly because it's so hard to keep up the fantasy that there's bound to be failures.

But Snood wants to know if I tell people to their face that they are deluded, that their belief is no different than that of Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy. And the answer is yes. I don't use the word hogwash, but I have used fairy tale, myth and made-up story.

But I do smile when I am saying it and I shrug "Whatever."

Just for a moment they lose traction and you can see them slipping but then they perk up and re-embrace whatever myth it was they were holding onto and life goes on.

Joe(so it does.)Nation
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 07:49 pm
Chumly wrote:
and weeping
Yeah.

The tears are just a flowin'

http://web4.ehost-services.com/el2ton1/laughing1.gif
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 08:45 pm
Joe Nation wrote:

The Christians and the Catholics are a little stunned when my disbelief floats into a conversation. They have a hard time getting a handle on it.
Have you considered the possibility that they just don't give a damn?

Joe Nation wrote:

I don't do well with hypocrites and I find that a lot of believers are hypocrites mainly because it's so hard to keep up the fantasy that there's bound to be failures.

Are you certain you are completely free of this common malady yourself?
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 08:54 pm
Re: Why aren't they all just considered ridiculous?
Chumly wrote:
Why aren't Christians / Jews / Moslems / Buddhists etc simply considered to be eccentric, crazy and ridiculous?

Even many people whom one would surmise would know better appear to take them seriously at least to some fair degree and at least in the context of the popular media and in many cases far beyond that realm too.


Given the near universality of religion in human culture and the remarkable commonality of the moral values articulated by the most prominent religions, noted above, one could make a serious case suggesting that one who summarily rejected the possibility of enduring value in any of them was himself a bit out of tune with the reality of human experience.

This is not to suggest there are no contradictions in these faiths or the absence of worse contradictions in the manner in which those in power have used religion for their own purposes. Instead I am considering the evident human appetite for the spiritual values common to these religions and the likelihood that there may be some transcendent meaning involved.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 09:22 pm
Re: Why aren't they all just considered ridiculous?
georgeob1 wrote:
Given the near universality of religion in human culture and the remarkable commonality of the moral values articulated by the most prominent religions, noted above, one could make a serious case suggesting that one who summarily rejected the possibility of enduring value in any of them was himself a bit out of tune with the reality of human experience.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 09:29 pm
I agree -- I didn't claim it as a proof of anything. However the prudent stundent of mankind would naturally give such consistency of behavior some place in his theorizing of just what all this may mean - or not mean. Your proposition was that believers are necessarily crazy and/or ridiculous, and you imply that the truth of this is obvious.

I don't think you have made your case in a persuasive manner. Far from it. Indeed, in the absence of a theory of everything, one could consider your certainty as the indicator of a certain irrationality or blindness.

I'm now in San Francisco, and it's summer here too! (Today's temperature 63 deg F !)
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 09:43 pm
Given that the level of any and all religious belief taken as a whole or individually has the equivalent rational plausibility of a belief that the dark side of the moon is made out of Jell-O for 10 minutes once every 10,000 years, I prefer to err on the side of caution in my assessment of what constitutes eccentric, crazy and ridiculous.

I think it's warmer here than in SF, nice town not that dissimilar to Vancouver in some ways.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 09:45 pm
I believe there is no foundation for your probability calculation, outside of the metaphor with which you characterized it.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 09:47 pm
In a nutshell (pun) you'd need to demonstrate the viability in rational terms of the religions in question in order for me to take them seriously. It's not my burden of proof to make n'est pas?
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 09:50 pm
The more outrageous the claim the more substantive the requisite proof is a principle I uphold, but perhaps you do not?
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 09:52 pm
No. You posited that believers are necessarily crazy or ridiculous. That alone gives you a rather formidable burden of proof. Secular intolerance is hardly an improvement over the religious versions we all know so well.

I like Vancouver. it shares some common characteristics with San Francisco - climate, the natural beauty of the surroundings, a pervasive cranky individuality, accompanied by remarkable tolerance and, of course a certain funkiness.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 10:50 pm
Yes I'll agree that I essentially "posited that believers are necessarily crazy or ridiculous". No that does not mean I must prove a negative as per your assertion of a "rather formidable burden of proof."

Why?

Because as discussed the more outrageous the claim the more substantive the requisite proof is a principle I uphold, and the believers in question make outrageous claims with zero substantive requisite proof. Therefore they have no rational basis for their beliefs.

No rational basis for their beliefs is a rational reason not to take them seriously. If I cannot take them seriously it is rational to consider them "crazy or ridiculous" within the context of their irrational beliefs.

Unsurprisingly I ask again: the more outrageous the claim the more substantive the requisite proof is a principle I uphold, but perhaps you do not?

I am not quite sure how you connect my assessment of their zero substantive requisite proof beliefs to infer that intolerance is the net result. Many people I know do goofy things, so do I.

Nice summation of Vancouver / San Francisco! Wouldn't it be cool if you could ride all the way down the West Coast of North America as one single country? We should start a thread called "Unifying US & Canada". That would be sure to stir up some ****!
0 Replies
 
stlstrike3
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 11:16 pm
Chumly wrote:
We should start a thread called "Unifying US & Canada". That would be sure to stir up some ****!


Surely Canada isn't that retarded.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 11:22 pm
Laughing

Me & georgeob1 like the idea believe it or no!
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 12:09 am
Joe Nation wrote:
snood wrote:
Lemme ask y'all something...

Is your feeling that it's right to ridicule religions at all limited by the setting? I mean to say, I think there are things that are acceptable in a cyber forum that might seem otherwise face-to-face. Granted, as someone has just said - this is an internet forum, and pretty much anything goes and sissies take their marbles and go home. But would you approach the subject any differently with real ive people in - say, a classroom? Or would you be just as apt to barrel right into a bunch of people discussing their religions and say some thing like "Well I think you're all deluded and your beliefs are superstitions nonsense?"

Would it constrain or change your words if you had to look someone in the eyes and say 'your imaginary god/friend is hogwash, just like the tooth fairy and Santa'?

As you can easily guess, I ask because I don't think it would be as easy in person - and I think if that's true, then it begs other questions about what the ridiculing person is doing, and why.

=======
I think, and people have told me, that I am no different on this forum than I am in real, face to face, life. I am true to my word. I see no value in hiding the truth. I take time when making judgments about situations and the people in them. I do my best at all times. And I am funny. Maybe funnier in real life, I don't know.

My co-workers all know I don't believe there is a god. It's a question I've been asked and I always answer honestly. Some of them are pretty confused about it. "How come," asked one a few months ago, "that the only one around here who doesn't believe in God is the only one who won't lie to the clients." Everybody laughed.

The Muslims and I have long talks because I am curious about the workings of Islam and they LOVE to talk. They give me books. They like it that I, unlike others, do not resent them taking six days a year off for holy days, in additional to taking the Christian holidays too. I tell them I think it's a racket and that I am starting a new religion where every other Monday is holy.

The Christians and the Catholics are a little stunned when my disbelief floats into a conversation. They have a hard time getting a handle on it.
But I tell them I don't live life waiting for some god to change the laws of nature and make a miracle. I think life is a miracle. I don't need to pray for things to get better while I am doing all I can to make them better. Wasted energy, isn't it?

Some people are a little sad, but I think they are sad that they haven't found another believer to share with. We've had talks about that too. I tell them I'm okay with just having this life and that I think this one life is all that they are going to get as well. Live well once. They wince.

I don't do well with hypocrites and I find that a lot of believers are hypocrites mainly because it's so hard to keep up the fantasy that there's bound to be failures.

But Snood wants to know if I tell people to their face that they are deluded, that their belief is no different than that of Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy. And the answer is yes. I don't use the word hogwash, but I have used fairy tale, myth and made-up story.

But I do smile when I am saying it and I shrug "Whatever."

Just for a moment they lose traction and you can see them slipping but then they perk up and re-embrace whatever myth it was they were holding onto and life goes on.

Joe(so it does.)Nation


Hello JOe, how do you separate Catholics from Christian??????? Any idea how far back the Catholics have arrived from??? There are many Christian religious sects, but the Catholic Church came before any of them.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 04:06 am
Quote:
Hello JOe, how do you separate Catholics from Christian???????


They don't lump themselves together why should I? Don't take my word for it, ask a Catholic if they are a Christian and watch the wheels turn.

"So, are you a Christian?"
"Well, I'm a Catholic."
"But are you saved?"
"What? Well, no. I mean yes, but not like you mean."


and for equally interesting times, ask a Bible believing Christian if they are a Catholic. It's like asking them if they are an apostate.

"The Lord Jesus Christ is my personal Savior."
"So, are you a Catholic?"
"A what?! (look of horror passes over face) No. I believe in the Bible."

==
Please note that I've spent a lot of my life working with religious people. I like most of them, some I've even loved -for their charity to others, for their work to find ways to peace in the world.

For most however, their lives, instead of being one of calmness supported by faith, seems delicately balanced and the slightest challenge sets them off. They surround themselves with rituals, prayers, song and music, long sessions of reading Bible passages, all in an attempt to shore up their faith when a faith should float on it's own.

I think it's a recognition that the easiest answer -"It's God's will." isn't true. That's a problem for them. It's not one for me.

I hope I am not a hypocrite. Snood has already called me a bigot.

I am thinking of starting a club called "Hypocrites, Bigots and Idiots".

All are welcome.

Joe(The names should cover about everybody)Nation
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 04:16 am
Quote:
For most however, their lives, instead of being one of calmness supported by faith, seems delicately balanced and the slightest challenge sets them off. They surround themselves with rituals, prayers, song and music, long sessions of reading Bible passages, all in an attempt to shore up their faith when a faith should float on it's own.


I wonder how much of this has to do with fear, the fear they didn't try hard enough and will be rejected by God.

I recall a cousin of mine trying to convert me to their very conservative form of Baptist. When I told him I wasn't a Christian the very first thing he said was; "You don't want to go to Hell, do you?"

I think for him and those like-minded conservative religious, fear of Hell plays a very big part in how intensely they believe. Would be interesting to see what the Christian religion would be like if there was an absence of Hell, of a wrathful and vengeful God.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 04:17 am
I'd like to hear more people's opinions about how much, if at all, the anonymity effect of the internet lends itself to harsher ridicule of religions (or anything else the person wants to ridicule - religions were the topic here).

I think its a no-brainer... The same reason more of us are divas (or divos?) in the shower but shy to sing in public; the same thing that can make a person who is publicly introverted to be a road rager - the aspect of anonymity.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/30/2025 at 12:03:53