0
   

DemoKKKrats and their new slaves

 
 
Reply Sat 26 May, 2007 06:25 am
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi


IMPORTING A SLAVE CLASS

Quote:
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 655 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 May, 2007 06:45 am
After the civil war, we realized the only way to truly end the conditions of slavery, was to make sure that everyone in the country was able to become a citizen.

Citizens don't make good slaves. This is why we passed the 14th amendment.

At the time there were many who wanted to send all of the former slaves "back to their country". But those who were in favor of granting citizenship won out, and our country has done quite well since then
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 May, 2007 09:18 am
ebrown_p wrote:
After the civil war, we realized the only way to truly end the conditions of slavery, was to make sure that everyone in the country was able to become a citizen.

Citizens don't make good slaves. This is why we passed the 14th amendment.

At the time there were many who wanted to send all of the former slaves "back to their country". But those who were in favor of granting citizenship won out, and our country has done quite well since then


There are about a dozen gaping holes in that line of argument. One is that many if not most of the people we're talking about don't WANT to become US citizens; they want to take over sections of US territory via demographics and incorporate them into a "Greater Mexico" in much the manner in which Albanians try to do the same thing in Balkan countries.

The idea of Anglos having "taken" the southwest states or Ca. from Mexico by the way is ludicrous. They never HAD those territories. Hispanics had only had 300 years to settle California before the Anglos arrived, and Anglos would not have been able to just walk into a settled region. There was nobody there at the time other than a few coastal Indians.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 May, 2007 10:23 am
Browne
If the people are slaves it is their own doing. Who the hell asked them to trespass ? I should note there are no shackles on them. They with the blessing of taxpaying US citizens can return from whence they came. And they do not even have to sneak back in. We will help them out.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 May, 2007 11:36 am
Seeing as you two made the connection... I was curious about what the KKK really thinks about illegal immigration.

KKK wrote:

Dear Concerned Americans,

Like you, I am outraged at the indifference the leaders of America have toward the immigration crisis
.
I refuse to believe that the problem could not be solved if they really wanted to fix it. The real crisis isn't that our borders are being breached, but that those who say they are the spokesmen for America, lack commitment and integrity. In reality, they are confused. Our nation has become so multi-racial that the politicians can't decide which group to offend and which group to support. As the numbers of non-white immigrants increase, the loyalty America's "leaders" have toward the white population will dwindle. It already has. All major parties are courting the non-white vote and the illegal alien (potential) vote - especially!


It sounds like Au and Gunga all are more in line with the KKK on this then the "DemoKKKrats". How ironic.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 May, 2007 01:40 pm
You know, if we were talking about 20,000 or 40,000 people you might have some room to call anybody a racist. When we're talking about 15,000,000 people in ten or twelve years, we're talking about a rogue political party which is trying to gain power by ****ing with the basic demographics of the country.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 May, 2007 02:01 pm
ebrown_p
I am not committed to the democratic or republican party. Just call it like I see it. After participating in this forum and seeing what a true liberal democrat stands for I have turned right. However, not to far right. I am waiting for a party whose major concern is for the good of the American citizen. An America first party. With an American flag not a animal as a symbol.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 May, 2007 05:17 pm
Au,

There is an "America First" party that is affiliated with Pat Buchannan. I think you would probably feel comfortable with them. There is also a party called the "Constitution Party" which is more prominant than the "America First" party but may be a little conservative even for you.

I think both of these parties have a wonderful affect on the American political landscape <<ebrown grins mysteriously>>.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 May, 2007 05:19 pm
Gunga, who said anything about racists?

Are you saying that loving your country, opposing the third world invasion, defend its Christian heritage and laws makes you a racist?

Why do you have to throw that term around here?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 May, 2007 05:23 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Au,

There is an "America First" party that is affiliated with Pat Buchannan. I think you would probably feel comfortable with them. There is also a party called the "Constitution Party" which is more prominant than the "America First" party but may be a little conservative even for you.

I think both of these parties have a wonderful affect on the American political landscape <<ebrown grins mysteriously>>.



. I will set the agenda. Pat Buchannan has got to go
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 May, 2007 08:42 pm
au1929 wrote:
ebrown_p wrote:
Au,

There is an "America First" party that is affiliated with Pat Buchannan. I think you would probably feel comfortable with them. There is also a party called the "Constitution Party" which is more prominant than the "America First" party but may be a little conservative even for you.

I think both of these parties have a wonderful affect on the American political landscape <<ebrown grins mysteriously>>.



. I will set the agenda. Pat Buchannan has got to go


That's an interesting thing for you to say.

What don't you like about Pat Buchannan?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 May, 2007 06:08 am
I listen to the Mcgloglin(sp) report every sunday. Buchanon is one of the permanent participants. About 90% of the time I disagree with his expressed point of view. His sister isn't worth a damn either
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 06:07 am
au1929 wrote:
I listen to the Mcgloglin(sp) report every sunday. Buchanon is one of the permanent participants. About 90% of the time I disagree with his expressed point of view. His sister isn't worth a damn either


Who do you agree with?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » DemoKKKrats and their new slaves
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/06/2025 at 10:40:16